ObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate the results of intramedullary nail treatment in surgical treatment of adult displaced radius and ulna diaphyseal fractures.Patients and methodsEighteen patients (36 forearm fractures) who underwent intramedullary nail treatment due to radius and ulna fractures were retrospectively analyzed. Adult patients with displaced forearm double fractures were included in this study. Patients with open physeal lines, pathological fractures, Monteggia and Galeazzi fractures, distal radioulnar joint instability, bilateral fractures and bone loss were excluded.ResultsThirteen patients were male (72.2 %) and five were female (27.8 %). Average age of the patients was 35.16 (18–63). Twelve patients (66.7 %) suffered right and six patients (33.3 %) left forearm fractures. Average follow-up period was 77.7 (55–162) weeks, average bleeding amount was 51.11 (15–100) ml, average time to bone union was 11.3 (8–20) weeks, average surgery time was 61.94 (45–80) min and average fluoroscopy time was approximately 2 (1–5) min. According to Grace-Eversman criteria, results were excellent in 14 (77.8 %) patients, good in 3 (16.8 %) and acceptable in 1 (5.6 %). Average DASH questionnaire score was 15.15 (4–38.8). There was no iatrogenic vascular, neural and bone injury during surgery. There was late rupture of extensor pollicis longus tendon in one patient, 4 months after surgery.ConclusionIntramedullary fixation method has advantages, such as closed application, short surgery period, good cosmetic results and early return to movement. We think intramedullary fixation method may be used as an alternative treatment method to plate osteosynthesis in surgical treatment of radius and ulna diaphyseal fractures.

BACKGROUND:We compared the union and functional results of intramedullary nailing and open reduction internal fixation treatment applied to adults with a forearm diaphysis fracture (fracture of the radius and/or ulna).

Elastic intramedullary nailing is the main treatment method in the surgical treatment of pediatric forearm fractures. In this study, we compared the clinical outcomes of intramedullary nailing of forearm fractures with leaving the tips exposed and with placing the tip of the nails under the skin. We aimed to present the clinical outcomes of intramedullary nailing and determine the advantages and disadvantages of leaving the tips of the nails exposed. One hundred and ninety-two children with both-bone forearm fracture who were treated with titanium elastic nailing (TEN) in the Department of Orthopedics at Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital between January 2009 and December 2016 were included in the study. All cases had been followed up for at least 1 year. The tips of the TENs were left exposed in 74 and buried subcutaneously in 118 children. Union was achieved in all cases. Delayed union was observed in just one case. Skin irritation was observed in 11 (5.7%) of the exposed TEN cases. Superficial infection developed in two (1%) cases with exposed TEN tips. Migration developed during the follow-up of 11 (5.7%) cases with buried tips. The mean time to removal of TEN was 7.9 weeks in cases with exposed and 26.2 weeks in cases with buried cases. Refracture was observed in six buried (3.1%) cases and four exposed TEN (2.1%) cases in the first year after the removal of the nails. Perfect outcomes were achieved in 146 (76%) cases and good outcomes in 36 (19%) cases in our study. On comparing the rate of complications and clinicaloutcomes, leaving the TEN exposed seems to be safe.

No abstract

In cases where there is a solitary calculus in the distal ureter, the degree of urinary obstruction caused by the stone does not affect the success of stone clearance with SWL.

No abstract

BACKGROUND:The aim of the present study was to evaluate functional and cosmetic outcomes of adult patients who underwent intramedullary nailing with newly designed intramedullary radius nails for isolated radius diaphyseal fractures.

stone between the ureteric orifice and 1 cm proximal to the vesico-ureteric junction were included. In each case the stone diameter, days to stone clearance, number of shock waves applied per treatment, and number of sessions required to become stone-free were recorded. If the treatment failed this was also noted. Success rates in the prone and modified-prone groups were compared and analysed to assess which of the variables influenced success with ESWL. RESULTSAfter ESWL, 95.5% of the 268 patients were stone-free; the rates in the prone and modified-prone groups were 89.9% and 97.5%, respectively ( P = 0.015). The probability of success with ESWL therapy for pre-vesical calculi in modified-prone position was about five times (odds ratio 4.56, 95% confidence interval 1.2-17.7) greater than that expected with when prone. The modifiedprone position was an independent factor most significantly influencing success with ESWL in these patients. CONCLUSIONThe modified-prone position for ESWL is a new and very effective way to treat patients with pre-vesical stones.