Craniopagus-type conjoined twins (joined at the head) are exceedingly rare. Separation of craniopagus conjoined twins is a challenging task mainly owing to complex vascular anatomy and limited experience with this disorder. Modern neuroimaging techniques including digital subtraction angiography can be used to preoperatively assess the cerebral vascular system. These techniques can also provide the raw data to fabricate three-dimensional true-scale models. We report a case in which endovascular techniques have been used in the separation of craniopagus conjoined twins. To our knowledge there are no reports of successful incorporation of neurointerventional methods in the disconnection of shared venous channels.
Background:
The optimal timing for performing cranioplasty and its effect on functional outcome remains debatable. Multiple confounding factors may come into role; including the material used, surgical technique, cognitive assessment tools, and the overall complications. The aim of this study is to assess the neurological outcome and postoperative complications in patients who underwent early versus late cranioplasty.
Methods:
A retrospective cohort study was conducted to investigate the neurological outcome and postoperative complications in patients who underwent cranioplasty between 2005 and 2018 at a Level l trauma center. Early and late cranioplasties were defined as surgeries performed within and more than 90 days of decompressive craniectomy, respectively. The Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) and modified Rankin scale (mRS), recorded within 1 week of cranioplasty, were used to assess the neurological outcome.
Results:
A total of 101 cases of cranioplasty were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 31.4 ± 13.9 years. Most patients (n = 86; 85.1%) were male. The mean GOS for all patients was 4.0 ± 1.0. The mean mRS was 2.2 ± 1.78. Hydrocephalus was noted in 18 patients (early, n = 6; late, n = 12; P = 0.48). Seizures developed in 28 patients (early, n = 12; late, n = 16; P = 0.77).
Conclusion:
The neurological outcome in patients who underwent early versus late cranioplasty is almost identical. The differences in the rates of overall postoperative complications between early versus late cranioplasty were statistically insignificant. The optimal timing for performing cranioplasty is mainly dependent on the resolution of cerebral swelling.
Background:
Primary spinal glioblastomas are extremely rare neoplasms and account for only 0.2% of glioblastoma cases. Due to the rare incidence of spinal cord glioblastoma in the literature, its natural history/ outcome remains undetermined. The present article describes the clinical presentation, radiological/pathological characteristics, and outcome of the primary spinal cord glioblastoma.
Case Description:
Two young patients initially presented with paresis that rapidly progressed to paraplegia. Nondermatomal sensory deficits were also noted, mainly affecting the lower limbs. Neuroradiological imaging revealed an extensive intramedullary spinal cord lesion, with no evidence of concurrent intracranial space-occupying lesions. Thoracic laminectomy, followed by tumor debulking and/or biopsy, was performed. The histomorphology was suggestive of glioblastoma, the World Health Organization grade 4 (Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-wild type). They were discharged in stable condition and were started on chemoradiotherapy, with clinicoradiological follow-up. One patient passed away after 9 months of initial presentation. The other patient was alive at 6-month follow-up.
Conclusion:
Primary spinal glioblastoma is a rare and challenging tumor. Patients commonly present with a progressive paresis, resulting in paraplegia, regardless of the surgical resection extent, and received adjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, primary spinal cord glioblastoma should be considered in patients reporting a rapid lower limb weakness with neuroradiological evidence of extensive, exophytic intramedullary lesion of the spine. A biopsy-proven histopathological diagnosis is of indisputable importance to establish the final diagnosis and plan treatment options.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.