Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kemampuan motorik kasar anak melalui kegiatan bermain lempar tangkap bola plastik di Kelompok B PAUD Sariwangi Kecamatan Wakorumba Selatan Kabupaten Muna. Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah guru dan anak didik pada kelompok B PAUD Sariwangi Kecamatan Wakorumba Selatan Kabupaten Muna yang berjumlah 15 orang anak yang terdiri atas 7 orang anak laki-laki dan 8 orang anak perempuan dengan rentang usia 5-6 tahun. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan dalam dua siklus. Tahap-tahap dalam penelitian mengikuti prosedur Penelitian Tindakan kelas, yaitu: (1) perencanaan, (2) pelaksanaan, (3) pengamatan atau observasi, dan (4) refleksi. Berdasarkan hasil analisis belajar anak tentang Meningkatkan Kemampuan Motorik Kasar Anak Melalui Kegiatan Bermain Lempar tangkap Bola Plastik pada siklus I diperoleh persentase ketercapaian sebesar 60% atau 8 anak didik dan mengalami peningkatan pada siklus II dengan persentase ketercapaian sebesar (86,66%) atau 13 anak didik dari 15 anak. Kata Kunci : Kemampuan Motorik Kasar, Anak, Lempar Tangkap Bola Plastik.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kemampuan membaca permulaan melalui media kartu huruf di Kelompok B TK Kartika XX-46 Kendari. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian tindakan kelas (PTK). Penelitian ini dilaksanakan dalam dua siklus dimana setiap siklus terdiri dari empat kali pertemuan. Tahap-tahap dalam penelitian ini mengikuti prosedur penelitian tindakan kelas, yaitu: (1) perencanaan, (2) pelaksanaan, (3) observasi atau pengamatan, dan (4) refleksi. Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah guru dan anak didik di Kelompok B TK Kartika XX-46 Kendari yang berjumlah 20 anak didik yang terdiri atas 9 orang anak perempuan dan 11 orang anak laki-laki dengan rentang usia 5-6 tahun. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan adanya peningkatan hasil belajar. Sebelum tindakan diperoleh persentase sebesar 40% dan mengalami peningkatan pada siklus I yaitu sebesar 15% sehingga menjadi 65%. Pada siklus II mengalami peningkatan sebesar 20% dari siklus I sehingga menjadi 85%. Dengan demikian dapat disimpulkan bahwa kemampuan membaca permulaan anak di Kelompok B TK Kartika XX-46 Kendari dapat ditingkatkan melalui media kartu huruf.Kata Kunci: Kemampuan Membaca, Permulaan Anak, Media Kartu Huruf
Tujuan pelaksanaan penelitian ini adalah untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berbicara anak melalui model bermain peran di Kelompok B TK Dian EkawatiKendari. Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah anak Kelompok B TK Dian Ekawati Kendari yang berjumlah 20 orang. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian tindakan kelas dan dilaksanakan 2 (dua) siklus, setiap siklus terdiri atas: perencanaan, pelaksanaan, observasi/evaluasi dan refleksi. Hasil penelitian pada siklus I diperoleh persentase sebesar 88,8% sedangkan aktivitas belajar anak diperoleh persentase 88,8%. Pada siklus II, persentase ketercapaian aktivitas mengajar guru mengalami peningkatan menjadi 94,7%, sedangkan persentase ketercapaian aktivitas belajar anak juga mengalami peningkatan menjadi 94,4%. Berdasarkan hasil evaluasi tentang kemampuan berbicara anak dengan menggunakan model bermain peran menunjukkan bahwa hasil observasi diperoleh persentase sebesar 50% dan mengalami peningkatan pada siklus I yaitu sebesar 65%. Pada siklus II diperoleh persentase sebesar 95%. Dengan demikian dapat disimpulkan bahwa keterampilan sosial anak Kelompok B TK Dian Ekawati Kendari dapat ditingkatkan melalui model bermain peran.Kata kunci: Pembelajaran, Kemampuan Berbicara Anak, Bermain Peran
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kemampuan membilang angka melalui media papan flanel di kelompok B TK Dharma Wanita Maginti. Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah guru dan anak didik pada Kelompok B Tk Dharma Wanita Maginti yang berjumlah 14 orang anak yang terdiri atas 9 orang anak perempuan dan 5 orang anak laki-laki. Berdasarkan data yang diperoleh tentang peningkatan kemampuan membilang angka melalui media papan flanel menunjukkan bahwa terdapat peningkatan. Hal ini dapat dibuktikan berdasarkan analisis hasil belajar anak didik secara klasikal, pada siklus I diperoleh persentase yaitu 64,29% atau 9 orang dari 14 anak, dimana ada 3 anak yang berada pada kategori Berkembang Sangat Baik (BSB) dan 6 anak yang dengan kategori Berkembang Sesuai Harapan (BSH). Pada siklus II diperoleh persentase sebesar 85,71% atau 12 orang dari 14 anak, dimana ada 5 anak yang berada pada kategori Berkembang Sangat Baik (BSB) dan 7 anak yang berada pada kategori Berkembang Sesuai Harapan (BSH).
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kemampuan kinestetik anak melalui permainan lari karung di Kelompok B TK Sangia Jampaka Kabupaten Buton Tengah. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian tindakan kelas (PTK). Penelitian ini dilaksanakan dalam dua siklus. Tahap-tahap dalam penelitian ini mengikuti prosedur penelitian tindakan kelas. Tahapan dalam penelitian ini yaitu: (1) perencanaan, (2) pelaksanaan tindakan, (3) observasi dan evaluasi, dan (4) refleksi. Subjek dalam penelitian adalah guru dan anak di TK Sangia Jampaka Kabupaten Buton Tengah. Berdasarkan analisis data hasil observasi aktivitas mengajar guru pada siklus I diperoleh presentase ketercapaian sebesar 66,67%, sedangkan siklus II presentase ketercapaian aktivitas mengajar guru mengalami peningkatan menjadi 83,33. Pada aktivitas belajar anak pada siklus I presentase ketercapaian sebesar 83,33%, sedangkan presentase ketercapaian aktivitas belajar anak pada siklus II juga mengalami peningkatan menjadi 91,67. Berdasarkan analisis data aktivitas hasil belajar pada siklus I diperoleh presentase 73,33%. Pada siklus II diperoleh presentase sebesar 93,33%. Dengan demikian dapat disimpulkan bahwa kemampuan kinestetik anak di TK Sangia Jampaka Kabupaten Buton Tengah dapat ditingkatkan melalui permainan lari karung.Kata kunci: Kemampuan Kinestetik, Permainan Lari Karung, Anak.
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk meningkatkan kemampuan membaca puisi siswa kelas V SDN 1 Langori Kabupaten Kolaka melalui penerapan pembelajaran kontekstual. Prosedur penelitian yaitu; (a) perencanaan (planning), (b) pelaksanaan tindakan (action), (c) observasi dan evaluasi (observation and evaluation), dan (d) refleksi (reflection). Data dalam penelitian ini terdiri dari data kualitatif dan data kuantitatif. Deskripsi kualitatif digunakan untuk menganalisis aktivitas guru dan siswa selama proses pembelajaran membaca puisi dengan pendekatan kontekstual. Deskripsi kuantitatif digunakan untuk menganalisis data peningkatan kemampuan membaca puisi siswa setelah pembelajaran dilaksanakan dalam setiap siklusnya. Hasil yang diperoleh dari penelitian ini yaitu dari kemampuan membaca puisi mengalami peningkatan yakni pada tindakan siklus I nilai ketuntasan secara klasikal adalah 45% dan nilai rata-rata siswa mencapai 65,05. Pada siklus II hasil belajar siswa untuk kemampuan membaca puisi mengalami peningkatan yakni nilai ketuntasan secara klasikal adalah 85% yang telah memenuhi Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal (KKM) 70, dan nilai rata-rata siswa mencapai 77,85. Pada siklus I pertemuan pertama aktivitas guru mencapai 47,05%, dan pada pertemuan kedua mencapai 58,82%. Pada siklus II pertemuan pertama aktivitas guru meningkat menjadi 64,70%, dan pada pertemuan kedua mencapai 94,11%. Dan aktivitas belajar siswa pada siklus I pertemuan pertama mencapai 45,45% dan pertemuan kedua 54,54%. Pada siklus II pertemuan pertama mencapai 72,72% dan meningkat pada pertemuan kedua mencapai 90,90 %.Kata kunci: Model Pembelajaran, Kontekstual, Hasil Belajar
Language skills are significant predictors of early academic and social-emotional outcomes of children and are important predictors of school readiness. This study aims to improve children's language skills through the application of mind mapping learning methods. This classroom action research used Kemmis and Taggart's cycle model. The research subjects were 12 children in group B consisting of eight boys and four girls. The data was collected through observation, interviews, and documentation with the validity of the data using source triangulation and method triangulation. This research uses data analysis techniques in the form of data condensation, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results showed that the children's language skills through the application of the mind mapping method in the first cycle were 75%, and in the second cycle had increased to 92%. Based on the results of teacher observations in the implementation of cycle I, the children's language skills obtained a percentage value of 61.5%, and in cycle II increased to 92.3%. While the results of observations of children's activities in the implementation of the first cycle obtained a percentage of 54%, and in the second cycle, it increased to 85%. This study found that the teacher's assessment of this mind mapping method was an easy method to understand so that it was easy to apply in classroom learning. The implication of this research is that it is necessary to carry out further research on the application of the mind mapping method for other aspects of development. Keywords: Early Childhood, language Skills, Mind Mapping Learning Methods References: Abi-El-Mona, I., & Adb-El-Khalick, F. (2008). The influence of mind mapping on eighth graders’ science achievement. School Science and Mathematics, 108(7), 298–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2008.tb17843.x Alamsyah, M. (2019). Kiat jitu meningkatkan prestasi dengan mind mapping (A. Safa, Ed.; 2nd ed.). Mitra Pelajar. Arimbi, Y. D., Saparahayuningsih, S., & Ardina, M. (2018). Meningkatkan Perkembangan Kognitif Melalui Kegiatan Mind Mapping. Jurnal Ilmiah Potensia, 3(2), 64–71. Aykac, V. (2014). An application regarding the availability of mind maps in visual art education based on active learning method. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1859–1866. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.sbspro.2015.01.848. Balim, A. G. (2013). The effect of mind-mapping applications on upper primary students success and inquiry-learning skills in science and environment education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 22(4), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2013.826543 Batdi, V. (2015). A Meta-analysis Study of Mind Mapping Techniques and Traditional Learning Methods. The Anthropologist, 20(1–2), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2015.11891724 Berman, R. A. (2007). Developing Linguistic Knowledge and Language Use Across Adolescence. In E. Hoff & M. Shatz (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Language Development (pp. 347–367). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757833.ch17 Bishop, D. V. M., Snowling, M. J., Thompson, P. A., Greenhalgh, T., & and the CATALISE-2 consortium. (2017). Phase 2 of CATALISE: A multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: Terminology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58(10), 1068–1080. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12721 Botting, N., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (2000). Social and behavioural difficulties in children with language impairment. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 16(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/026565900001600201 Budd, J. W. (2004). Mind maps as classroom exercises. Journal of Economic Education, 35(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.35.1.35-46 Budyawati, L. P. I. (2016). Implementasi Metode Mind Mapping untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Bercerita Anak kelas B di PAUD Sarin Rare Mas Ubud. Pancaran, 5(3), 1–16. Buzan, T. (2005). Mind map: The ultimate thinking tool. Thorston. Buzan, Tony. (2005). Buku Pintar Mind Map. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Buzan, Tony. (2007). Buku Pintar Mind Map untuk Anak. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Chang, Y. H., Chang, C. Y., & Tseng, Y. H. (2010). Trends of science education research: An automatic content analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(4), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9202-2 Chiou, C. C. (2008). The effect of concept mapping on students’ learning achievements and interests. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 375–387. Chow, J. C., & Jacobs, M. (2016). The role of language in fraction performance: A synthesis of literature. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 252–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.017 Chularut, P., & DeBacker, T. K. (2004). The influence of concept mapping on achievement, self-regulation, and self-efficacy in students of English as a second language. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(3), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2003.09.001 Clegg, J., Law, J., Rush, R., Peters, T. J., & Roulstone, S. (2015). The contribution of early language development to children’s emotional and behavioural functioning at 6 years: An analysis of data from the Children in Focus sample from the ALSPAC birth cohort. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12281 Davies, M. (2011). Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: What are the differences and do they matter? Higher Education, 62, 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9387-6. DePorter, B., & Hernacki, M. (2015). Quantum Learning: Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan. Kaifa. Dhieni, N. (2008). Metode Pengembangan Bahasa. Universitas Terbuka. Dhindsa, HS., M., K., & Anderson, OR. (2011). Constructivist-visual mind map teaching approach and the quality of students’ cognitive structures. Science Education Technology, 20, 186–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010- 9245-4. Duff, F. J., Reen, G., Plunkett, K., & Nation, K. (2015). Do infant vocabulary skills predict school‐age language and literacy outcomes? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56(8), 848–856. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12378 Farrand, P., Fearzana, H., & Hennessy, E. (2002). The efficacy of the mind map study technique. Medical Education, 36, 426–431. Hapidin, H., Pujianti, Y., & Juniasih, I. (2019). The The Effectiveness of Using Mind Mapping Method to Improve Child Development Assessment. JPUD - Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini, 13(1), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.21009/10.21009/jpud.131.13 Hendarwati, E. (2015). Peningkatan Kemampuan Bahasa Melalui Mind Mapping pada Anak TK Aisyah 29 Surabaya. Jurnal Didaktis, 12(1). Hoff, E. (2013). Interpreting the early language trajectories of children from low-SES and language minority homes: Implications for closing achievement gaps. Developmental Psychology, 49(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027238 Holley, C. D., Dansereau, D. F., McDonald, B. A., Garland, J. C., & Collins, K. W. (1979). Evaluation of a hierarchical mapping technique as an aid to prose processing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 4(3), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(79)90043-2 Horton, P. B., McConney, A. A., Gallo, M., Woods, A. L., Senn. G. J., & Hamelin, D. (1993). An investigation of the effectiveness of concept mapping as an instructional tool. Science Education, 77, 95–111. Hulme, C., Nash, H. M., Gooch, D., Lervåg, A., & Snowling, M. J. (2015). The Foundations of Literacy Development in Children at Familial Risk of Dyslexia. Psychological Science, 26(12), 1877–1886. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615603702 Indriyani, M. P., Wirya, I. N., & Parmiti, D. P. (2013). Penerapan metoda mind mapping berbantuan media. Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Undiksha, 1(1), 1–10. Jalongo, M. R. (2014). E arly Childhood Language Arts (6th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc. Jones, B. D., Ruff, C., Tech, V., Snyder, J. D., Tech, V., Petrich, B., Tech, V., & Koonce, C. (2012). The Effects of Mind Mapping Activities on Students ’ Motivation. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(1). Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331(6018), 772–775. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199327 Keles, O. (2012). Elementary teachers’ views on mind mapping. International Journal of Education, 4(1), 93–100. Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The Action Research Planner. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2 Law, J., Rush, R., Schoon, I., & Parsons, S. (2009). Modeling developmental language difficulties from school entry into adulthood: Literacy, mental health, and employment outcomes. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR, 52 6, 1401–1416. Lestari, N. G. A. M. Y. (2020). Penerapan Metode Mind Map Dalam Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Usia Dini. Pratama Widya: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia DIni, 5(1), 35–42. Locke, A., Ginsborg, J., & Peers, I. (2002). Development and disadvantage: Implications for the early years and beyond. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 37(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820110089911 Madu, BC., & Metu, IC. (2010). Effect of mind map as a notetaking approach on students’ achievements’ in economics. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences (JETEMS), 3(3), 247–251. McGillion, M., Pine, J. M., Herbert, J. S., & Matthews, D. (2017). A randomised controlled trial to test the effect of promoting caregiver contingent talk on language development in infants from diverse socioeconomic status backgrounds. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58(10), 1122–1131. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12725 Meier, PS. (2007). Mind-mapping. Social Research, 52, 1–4. Merchie, E., & Van Keer, H. (2016). Mind mapping as a meta-learning strategy: Stimulating pre-adolescents’ textlearning strategies and performance? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 128–147. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.cedpsych.2016.05.005 Mona, IA., & Khlaick, FA. (2008). The influence of mind mapping on eighth graders’ science achievement. School Science and Mathematics, 108(7), 298–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2008.tb17843.x Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knjowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413–448. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge University Press. O‟Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., & Hall, R. H. (2002). Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 71–86. Olivia, F. (2013). 5—7 Menit Asyik Mind Mapping Kreatif. Elex Media Computindo. Pace, A., Alper, R., Burchinal, M. R., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2019). Measuring success: Within and cross-domain predictors of academic and social trajectories in elementary school. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,46, 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.04.001 Padang, J. S. M., & Gurning, B. (2014). Improving Students’ Achievement in Writing Descriptive Text through Mind Mapping Strategy. Register Journal of English Language Teaching of FBS-Unimed, 3, 1–11. Patmonodewo, S. (2000). Pendidikan Anak Pra Sekolah. Rineka Cipta. Paxman, CG. (2011). Map your way to speech success! Employing mind mapping as a speech preparation technique. Communication Teacher, 25(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2010.513994 Riswanto, & Putra, P. P. (2012). The Use of Mind Mapping Strategy in the Teaching of Writing at SMAN 3 Bengkulu , Indonesia. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(21), 60–68. Saed, H. A., & AL-Omari, H. A. (2014). The Effectiveness of a Proposed Program Based on a Mind Mapping Strategy in Developing the Writing Achievement of Eleventh Grade EFL Students in Jordan and Their Attitudes Towards Writing. Journal of Education and Practice, 5, 88–109. San Risqiya, R. (2013). The Use of Mind Mapping in Teaching Reading Comprehension. ELTIN Journal, 1, 32–43. Serig, D. (2011). Beyond brainstorming: The mind map as art. Teaching Artist Journal, 9(4), 249–257. Somers, MJ., Passerini, K., Parhankangas, A., & Casal, J. (2014). Using mind maps to study how business school students and faculty organize and apply general business knowledge. The International Journal of Management Education, 12, 1–13. Warsidi, Burhanuddin, A., & Mustafa, M. (2014). A Collaboration Of Mind Mapping And Organizational Pattern To Improve Students ’ Essay Writing Ability. Jurnal Pasca Unhas, 11, 1–12. Whitehurst, G. J., & Fischel, J. E. (1994). Practitioner Review: Early Developmental language Delay: What. If Anything. Should the Clinician Do About It? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35(4), 613–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1994.tb01210.x Williams, M. H. (2012). Physical webbing: Collaborative kinesthetic three-dimensional mind maps. Active Learning in Higher Education, 13(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787411429185 Willis, C. L., & Miertschin, S. L. (2006). Mind maps as active learning tools. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 21(4), 266–272. Yunus, M. M., & Chien, C. H. (2016). The Use of Mind Mapping Strategy in Malaysian University English Test (MUET) Writing. Creative Education, 07(04), 619–626. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.74064
We conducted a survey to estimate the proportion of elementary school students in Southeast Sulawesi who have been able to read fluently while sitting at second grade. The information is needed to contribute to the policy towards enhancement of elementary student ability to read in their early stage of schools. A two-stage cluster sampling method had been applied in order to maintain the representativeness of selected samples over the whole population. At the first stage, we randomly chose the districts and, then, randomly selected the sub-districts. Finally, all elementary schools in each selected sub-district were taken as well as all their second grade students as the sampling units. Doing these, wegot 230 respondents randomly selected from 78 elementary schools of 20 sub-districts in all 6 selected districts or regencies. Based on the selected samples, it is approximately only 32% of students were able to read fluently, while the rest of them were unable or less abilityto read.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.