Scan to discover onlineBackground & Objective: The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS) is a new method for evaluating urinary cytology designed to reduce unreproducible reports. The aim of this study was to reclassify and compare urinary cytology reports with TPS criteria to determine the frequency of unreproducible reports compared to the previous system.Methods: In this study, the laboratory electronic registration system analyzed patients' urine samples taken by voided or washing and brushing methods. The cytological evaluation was performed considering the previous system and TPS by a pathologist. The results of the two systems were compared, and the sensitivity and specificity of TPS were calculated.Results: Urine samples were taken from 876 patients. The mean age of patients was 63.36 ± 12.62. Comparing the routine classification system and TPS, it was observed that the number of atypical reports in the TPS system decreased by 12%, and all of these cases were downgraded to the negative group in the new classification. The sensitivity and specificity of TPS were 29.4% and 95.1%, respectively, if suspected malignancy and positive reports for malignancy were considered. Finally, if positive reports for malignancy were selected, sensitivity and specificity changed to 11.8% and 100%, respectively.Conclusion: Although the TPS system has low sensitivity for the diagnosis of urothelial malignancies, due to its high specificity, it is possible to consider and use this classification for screening patients.

Background: Ovarian cancer (OC) is the 7th most common cancer, with 239,000 new cases per year. In Iran, it is the 8th most common cancer, with an ASIR of 3.9/100,000 women. The 5-year overall survival in Iran based on previous studies is about 61% which in comparison with eastern countries has better survival. Methods: The study included patients from the Iran National Cancer Registry from 2009-2014. Several steps were taken to control data quality. This study used a Kaplan-Meier survival curve to compare OC survival rates across geographical, pathological, and other variables. All analyses were done in R (4.02) and SPSS (26), with a 0.05 P-value considered statistically significant. Results: The study enrolled 7977 cases of OC. OC's ASIR was 4.10/100,000. In epithelial and non-specific OC, ASIR was >0.5. Five-year survival was 55% and 10-year survival was 45%. Conclusion: OC is the 8th most common cancer in Iran, with lower age-specific incidence and better overall survival than East Asia and North America. In Iran, as in Eastern Europe, OC incidence correlated with reduced total fertility rate and population aging. Five and 10-year overall survival rates were 55% and 44%, respectively, higher than the West. This may be because late stage OC patients are excluded from pathology and classified as “undiagnosed” in death certificates or hospitalization files.

Background: Skin cancer is the most common cancer in Iran. Given the importance of early diagnosis in treating early tumors, knowledge of the demographic and pathological findings of the disease is helpful. Objectives: The aim of present study was to investigate the incidence, trend and risk factors of melanoma in Iranian childhood and adolescents. Methods: The present retrospective study was performed between 2005 and 2013 on registered data in the National Cancer Registry System, Iran. The age group studied was patients 18 years or younger. Data included demographic status, risk factors, clinical and histopathological characteristics, and stage. Results: The results showed that 8 (57.1%) of 14 patients were males. The mean age of the study population was 8.71 ± 6.02 years (range, 1-15 years). Ten (71.4%) patients were of Fars ethnic groups. In terms of tumor invasiveness, 13 (92.9%) patients were invasive and one (7.1%) patient was in situ. The growth phase of melanoma was vertical in 13 (92.9%) patients and radial phase in one (7.1%) patient. In terms of lymph node metastasis, it was observed in only one patient. Surgical treatment was performed on all patients. Melanoma histology was nodular in 3 patients and unspecified or unregistered in the rest. The most area of the tumor was in the head/neck and lower limbs. Conclusions: According to the results, regardless of the differences in the specific coverage of the Iranian people, the distribution and statistical characteristics of malignant melanoma in Iran are almost similar to other countries in the world. Wider studies are recommended to confirm the findings of the present study.

The effects of radiation therapy (RT) for cancer can be systemic and partially mediated by the immune system. However, radiation alone is unlikely to transform an immunosuppressive environment into an immunostimulatory one. Therefore, an effective combination of RT and immunotherapy may provide a new, more efficient treatment approach. Here, we investigated how the expression of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in the tumor microenvironment varied in different RT regimens with the same biologically effective dose. In this study, female BALB/c mice inoculated with CT26 tumor cells were irradiated with 3 different RT regimens using the same BED of 40 gray (Gy). These included ablative RT (1*15 Gy), hypo-fractionated RT (2*10 Gy), and conventional (Hyper-fractionated) RT (10*3 Gy). PD-L1 expression was analyzed with immunohistochemical staining on days 2 and 20 and when the size of tumors had reached 2 cm2 after RT. All treated groups expressed PD-L1, but the group receiving single ablative high-dose RT showed higher expression compared to the other groups. No significant differences in PD-L1 expression were observed at different times in the same group. These findings showed that different regimens of RT have different effects on the TME, so a combination of RT and immune checkpoint blockade could be clinically used in cancer patients.

The effects of radiation therapy (RT) for cancer can be systemic and partially mediated by the immune system. However, radiation alone is unlikely to transform an immunosuppressive environment into an immunostimulatory one. Therefore, an effective combination of radiation therapy and immunotherapy may provide a new more efficient treatment approach. Here we investigated how the expression of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in the microenvironment of the tumor varied in different RT regimens with the same Biologically Effective Dose (BED). In this study, female BALB/c mice inoculated with CT26 tumor cells were irradiated with three different RT regimens using the same Biologically Effective Dose (BED) of 40 Gray (Gy). These included Ablative RT (1*15 Gy), Hypo-fractionated RT (2*10 Gy), and Conventional RT (10*3 Gy). PD-L1 expression was analyzed with immunohistochemical staining on days 2, 20, and when the size of tumors had reached 2 cm2 after RT. All treated groups expressed PD-L1, but the group receiving single ablative high dose RT showed higher expression compared to the other groups. No significant differences in PD-L1 expression were observed at different times in the same group. These findings showed that different regimens of RT have different effects on the tumor microenvironment (TME), so a combination of RT and immune checkpoint blockade could be clinically used in cancer patients.