The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has become a global health crisis. Considering the recent food and drug administration (FDA) approval of remdesivir as the first officially approved agent for COVID-19 treatment, we performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of remdesivir administration in COVID-19 patients. A systematic literature search was done through MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, medRxiv, and bioRxiv from their inception to December 22th, 2020. Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and five non-randomized studies of intervention (NRSI) were entered into the meta-analysis. The results showed that remdesivir administration was associated with a significant improvement in the 28-day recovery (RR=1.09, 95%CI, 1.04-1.15), low flow oxygen support through days one to 14 (RR=2.88, 95%CI, 1.80-4.60), and invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation requirement through days 14 to 28 of the follow-up time (RR=5.34, 95%CI, 2.37-12.05). The risk of experiencing serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was significantly lower (RR=0.75, 95%CI, 0.63-0.90) in the remdesivir group than the comparison/control group. The pooled median difference of the time to clinical improvement was 2.99 (95%CI=2.71-3.28), which did not remain significant during the sensitivity analysis. The clinical output comparison of the 5-day and 10-day remdesivir courses revealed that the 5-day regimen might provide similar benefits while causing fewer serious ADRs than 10-day. The current meta-analysis provided an updated evaluation of scientific evidence on the use of remdesivir in COVID-19 patients. Performing adequate well-designed RCTs are needed to show more accurate results.

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by a newly discovered coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, or SARS-CoV-2), continues to spread all around the world. Despite the emergency of COVID-19 worldwide, remdesivir is the only treatment that has been recently approved to treat the diseases, and other effective therapies are still lacking. SARS-CoV-2 may cause severe illness in 20% of patients. Based on available data, there is an association between interleukin-6 (IL-6) and severe COVID-19. Sarilumab is a fully human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody binding to both membrane-bound and soluble IL-6 receptors with high affinity and has been considered for off-label use in the treatment of COVID-19. Areas covered: The present article reviews recently published literature focusing on the pathophysiology of COVID-19 induced cytokine storm, the potential therapeutic role, and important clinical issues of sarilumab in the treatment of COVID-19 patients. Expert opinion: The off-label treatment administration is unavoidable in the critical situation of the COVID-19 pandemic. Further efforts should be directed to determine mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 induced immune dysregulation as well as indications of sarilumab in the patients with COVID-19 to minimize concerns regarding its off-label administration.

The pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has become a global crisis with a growing number of mortalities and morbidities worldwide. Despite performing numerous researches, there are still considerable unrevealed details regarding the long-term complications and post-infection immunity of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Based on pathophysiological features, SARS-CoV-2 may act similarly as an oncovirus in the lung. This letter summarized three possible oncogenic mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 that may be associated with lung cancer development.

No abstract

As of 16 July 2020, globally about 13.4 million cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been confirmed with nearly 600000 deaths. One of the main concerns about COVID-19 is long-term complications. Viruses account for about one-fifth of human cancer cases [1, 2]. Herein, three possible mechanisms of the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) as an oncogenic virus in the lung have been discussed briefly.

This study aimed to detect the defects of the current methods used to monitor unfractionated heparin (UFH) anticoagulant effect and find possible assistive parameters for activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) test to improve treatment performance. The required information was gathered from patients’ case records, treatment charts and laboratory reports. Kendall's tau correlation coefficient was calculated for analysing the relationship between variables. The partial least squares (PLS) and the stepwise multiple regression were operated, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the r-squared (r 2) were used to show the analytical ability of the models, respectively. Overall, 102 UFH-receiving ischemic heart disease patients participated in this study. The aPTT value varied from 30 to 95 s (mean ± SD = 44 ± 14). Therapeutic aPTT values were observed in 15% of hospitalization days. The aPTT value showed statistically significant correlations with mean UFH infusion (U/kg/h), age, prothrombin time (PT), smoking, international normalized ratio, haemoglobin (Hgb) and blood triglyceride level. Triglyceride level and PT were efficacious predictors of aPTT value (P < 0.001, r 2 = 0.336). Moreover, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and blood creatinine (Cr) levels were the best predictors for mortality. The mean BUN/Cr ratio was 18 ± 5 and 25 ± 12 in nonexpired and expired subjects, respectively. If calibrated institution-specific therapeutic aPTT ranges and updated weight-based UFH nomograms get employed, aPTT test, along with the BUN/Cr ratio and Hgb level, as assistive parameters for predicting haemorrhagic incidents, would be near ideal monitoring method in UFH-receiving patients.