No abstract

Abstract-Heterogeneous architectures consisting of generalpurpose CPUs and throughput-optimized GPUs are projected to be the dominant computing platforms for many classes of applications. The design of such systems is more complex than that of homogeneous architectures because maximizing resource utilization while minimizing shared resource interference between CPU and GPU applications is difficult. We show that GPU applications tend to monopolize the shared hardware resources, such as memory and network, because of their high thread-level parallelism (TLP), and discuss the limitations of existing GPU-based concurrency management techniques when employed in heterogeneous systems. To solve this problem, we propose an integrated concurrency management strategy that modulates the TLP in GPUs to control the performance of both CPU and GPU applications. This mechanism considers both GPU core state and system-wide memory and network congestion information to dynamically decide on the level of GPU concurrency to maximize system performance. We propose and evaluate two schemes: one (CM-CPU) for boosting CPU performance in the presence of GPU interference, the other (CM-BAL) for improving both CPU and GPU performance in a balanced manner and thus overall system performance. Our evaluations show that the first scheme improves average CPU performance by 24%, while reducing average GPU performance by 11%. The second scheme provides 7% average performance improvement for both CPU and GPU applications. We also show that our solution allows the user to control performance trade-offs between CPUs and GPUs.

In this paper, we present techniques that coordinate the thread scheduling and prefetching decisions in a General Purpose Graphics Processing Unit (GPGPU) architecture to better tolerate long memory latencies. We demonstrate that existing warp scheduling policies in GPGPU architectures are unable to effectively incorporate data prefetching. The main reason is that they schedule consecutive warps, which are likely to access nearby cache blocks and thus prefetch accurately for one another, back-to-back in consecutive cycles. This either 1) causes prefetches to be generated by a warp too close to the time their corresponding addresses are actually demanded by another warp, or 2) requires sophisticated prefetcher designs to correctly predict the addresses required by a future "far-ahead" warp while executing the current warp.We propose a new prefetch-aware warp scheduling policy that overcomes these problems. The key idea is to separate in time the scheduling of consecutive warps such that they are not executed back-to-back. We show that this policy not only enables a simple prefetcher to be effective in tolerating memory latencies but also improves memory bank parallelism, even when prefetching is not employed. Experimental evaluations across a diverse set of applications on a 30-core simulated GPGPU platform demonstrate that the prefetch-aware warp scheduler provides 25% and 7% average performance improvement over baselines that employ prefetching in conjunction with, respectively, the commonlyemployed round-robin scheduler or the recently-proposed two-level warp scheduler. Moreover, when prefetching is not employed, the prefetch-aware warp scheduler provides higher performance than both of these baseline schedulers as it better exploits memory bank parallelism.

No abstract

As GPUs make headway in the computing landscape spanning mobile platforms, supercomputers, cloud and virtual desktop platforms, supporting concurrent execution of multiple applications in GPUs becomes essential for unlocking their full potential. However, unlike CPUs, multiapplication execution in GPUs is little explored. In this paper, we study the memory system of GPUs in a concurrently executing multi-application environment. We first present an analytical performance model for many-threaded architectures and show that the common use of misses-perkilo-instruction (MPKI) as a proxy for performance is not accurate without considering the bandwidth usage of applications. We characterize the memory interference of applications and discuss the limitations of existing memory schedulers in mitigating this interference. We extend the analytical model to multiple applications and identify the key metrics to control various performance metrics. We conduct extensive simulations using an enhanced version of GPGPU-Sim targeted for concurrently executing multiple applications, and show that memory scheduling decisions based on MPKI and bandwidth information are more effective in enhancing throughput compared to the traditional FR-FCFS and the recently proposed RR FR-FCFS policies.

In this paper, we present techniques that coordinate the thread scheduling and prefetching decisions in a General Purpose Graphics Processing Unit (GPGPU) architecture to better tolerate long memory latencies. We demonstrate that existing warp scheduling policies in GPGPU architectures are unable to effectively incorporate data prefetching. The main reason is that they schedule consecutive warps, which are likely to access nearby cache blocks and thus prefetch accurately for one another, back-to-back in consecutive cycles. This either 1) causes prefetches to be generated by a warp too close to the time their corresponding addresses are actually demanded by another warp, or 2) requires sophisticated prefetcher designs to correctly predict the addresses required by a future "far-ahead" warp while executing the current warp.We propose a new prefetch-aware warp scheduling policy that overcomes these problems. The key idea is to separate in time the scheduling of consecutive warps such that they are not executed back-to-back. We show that this policy not only enables a simple prefetcher to be effective in tolerating memory latencies but also improves memory bank parallelism, even when prefetching is not employed. Experimental evaluations across a diverse set of applications on a 30-core simulated GPGPU platform demonstrate that the prefetch-aware warp scheduler provides 25% and 7% average performance improvement over baselines that employ prefetching in conjunction with, respectively, the commonlyemployed round-robin scheduler or the recently-proposed two-level warp scheduler. Moreover, when prefetching is not employed, the prefetch-aware warp scheduler provides higher performance than both of these baseline schedulers as it better exploits memory bank parallelism.

Modern memory access schedulers employed in GPUs typically optimize for memory throughput. They implicitly assume that all requests from different cores are equally important. However, we show that during the execution of a subset of CUDA applications, different cores can have different amounts of tolerance to latency. In particular, cores with a larger fraction of warps waiting for data to come back from DRAM are less likely to tolerate the latency of an outstanding memory request. Requests from such cores are more critical than requests from others. Based on this observation, this paper introduces a new memory scheduler, called (C)ritica(L)ity (A)ware (M)emory (S)cheduler (CLAMS), which takes into account the latency-tolerance of the cores that generate memory requests. The key idea is to use the fraction of critical requests in the memory request buffer to switch between scheduling policies optimized for criticality and locality. If this fraction is below a threshold, CLAMS prioritizes critical requests to ensure cores that cannot tolerate latency are serviced faster. Otherwise, CLAMS optimizes for locality, anticipating that there are too many critical requests and prioritizing one over another would not significantly benefit performance. We first present a core-criticality estimation mechanism for determining critical cores and requests, and then discuss issues related to finding a balance between criticality and locality in the memory scheduler. We progressively devise three variants of CLAMS, and show that the Dynamic CLAMS provides significantly higher performance, across a variety of workloads, than the commonly-employed GPU memory schedulers optimized solely for locality. The results indicate that a GPU memory system that considers both core criticality and DRAM access locality can provide significant improvement in performance.

No abstract