Since June 1978, 57 patients with primary osteogenic sarcoma of an extremity were treated with high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) and citrovorum factor rescue (CFR), Adriamycin, and the combination of bleomycin, cyclophosphamide and dactinomycin (BCD) given for 4-16 weeks prior to definitive surgery. Histologic examination of the resected primary tumor determined the effect of preoperative chemotherapy with many primary tumors showing greater than 90% tumor necrosis attributable to preoperative chemotherapy. A l l patients having this favorable effect of chemotherapy on the primary tumor were continued on the same chemotherapy regimen postoperatively (regimen B). However, in those patients not having a good effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the primary tumor, H D M T X with CFR was subsequently deleted from their postoperative chemotherapy and they were placed on a regimen containing cisplatinum at the dose of 120mg/M2 with mannitol diuresis combined with Adriamycin i n addition to BCD (regimen A). In the current study, 35 of the 57 patients did not demonstrate a good effect of chemotherapy on the primary tumor and were assigned to regimen A postoperatively. Of these 35 patients, 32 (91%)) have remained continuously free of recurrent or metastatic disease from 6-34 months following the start of therapy. Among the 22 remaining patients having a good histologic response and treated with regimen B postoperatively, there has been only one relapse in a patient who had a local recurrence in the area of an inadequately resected primary tumor three months after the cessation of chemotherapy. Thus, 53 of 57 patients (93%) are continuously with no evidence of recurrent or metastatic disease from 6-35 months (median, 20 months) from the start of treatment. This study demonstrates the value of thorough histologic examination in predicting survival i n responding patients and i n helping identify patients whose disease-free survival rate can be substantially increased if they are given alternative postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy after failing to have a good response to preoperative chemotherapy. This individualized chemotherapeutic strategy has yielded the highest disease free survival raw reported to date for osteogenic sarcoma.
BackgroundManipulation of immune checkpoints such as CTLA4 or PD-1 with targeted antibodies has recently emerged as an effective anticancer strategy in multiple malignancies. Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of diseases in need of more effective treatments. Different subtypes of soft tissue and bone sarcomas have been shown to express PD-1 ligand.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients (pts) with relapsed metastatic/unresectable sarcomas, who were treated with nivolumab provided under a patient assistance program from the manufacturer. Pts underwent CT or PET/CT imaging at baseline and after at least four doses of nivolumab; RECIST 1.1 criteria were used for response assessment.ResultsTwenty-eight pts with soft tissue (STS, N = 24) or bone sarcoma (N = 4), received IV nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks from July 2015. Median age was 57 (24–78), male:female ratio was 14:14; the median number of nivolumab cycles was eight. Eighteen pts concomitantly received pazopanib at 400–800 mg daily. The most common side effect was grade 1–2 LFT elevations; grade 3–4 toxicity occurred in five patients (colitis, LFT elevations, pneumonitis). Twenty-four pts received at least four cycles. We observed three partial responses: one dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma, one epithelioid sarcoma and one maxillary osteosarcoma (last two patients on pazopanib); nine patients had stable disease including three leiomyosarcomas; 12 patients had progression of disease including 4 leiomyosarcoma. Clinical benefit (response + stability) was observed in 50% of the evaluable patients.ConclusionsThese data provide a rationale for further exploring the efficacy of nivolumab and other checkpoint inhibitors in soft tissue and bone sarcoma.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13569-016-0064-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Since October 1973, 185 patients 21 years of age or younger with primary osteogenic sarcoma of an extremity were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty-five of the first fifty-two patients (48%) have remained free of disease for a median of 7 years. In the next chemotherapy protocol most patients had chemotherapy prior to amputation or resection, during which time the dose of high-dose methotrexate was escalated in many patients to that needed to shrink the primary tumor. For a median of 4 years 43 of 54 patients (80%) have remained free of disease. In the current protocol, the response of the primary tumor to chemotherapy with high-dose methotrexate was used to select postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for the patient. With the latter approach 73 of 79 patients (92%) have remained continuously free of disease for a median of 2 years. This experience demonstrates the value of chemotherapy in increasing the cure rate in osteogenic sarcoma and that the response to preoperative chemotherapy can help select postoperative chemotherapy to produce an even higher potential cure rate for osteogenic sarcoma.
The value of adjuvant chemotherapy in primary osteogenic sarcoma (OSA) is still considered controversial by some. One reason may be that various reported series include patients with widely varying prognostic variables. To address this, the effect of chemotherapy on the continuous disease-free (CNED) survival was analyzed in 100 patients aged 21 yr or less with OSA of the femur. This classically poor prognostic group of patients represented 51% of all primary OSA seen at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center during the study interval. This study includes all patients aged 21 yr or less with fully malignant (Grade III-IV/IV) OSA of the femur and no metastases treated from November 1973 through November 1981. The first (T-4) protocol (31 patients) consisted of high dose methotrexate (HDMTX) with leucovorin rescue, cyclophosphamide (Cyc), and adriamycin. In the second (T-7) protocol (23 patients) the dose of HDMTX was increased to 12 g/m2 for prepubescent patients, and bleomycin, Cyc, and dactinomycin replaced Cyc. The current (T-10) protocol (46 patients) uses the same CT as T-7, but patients not having a complete response of the primary tumor to preoperative CT receive additional cisplatinum (120 mg/m2) with adriamycin (30 mg/m2/day for two consecutive days). In 31 patients treated with T-4 the CNED survival was 32% with a minimum follow up of over 7 yr. On T-7, 15/23 patients with femur primaries had a CNED survival of 65% with all of the surviving patients followed for more than 5 yr. The addition of cisplatinum in T-10 has resulted in CNED survival rate of 77% in 34/44 patients (excluding two patients that died CNED during and after treatment); the median follow-up patients who are alive CNED is 33 months, with a minimum of 2 yr follow up on the last patient entered.
Two patients with sarcoma, one with recurrent osteosarcoma of the spine and the other with metastatic synovial cell sarcoma, were treated with high-dose chemotherapy that produced severe leukopenia. The patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to stimulate the bone marrow (480 mg given subcutaneously twice daily for 5 to 7 days); their responses were seen as a marked increase in peripheral leukocyte count with no change in the erythrocyte or platelet counts. The patients had fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) imaging 24 hours after the end of G-CSF treatment. Diffusely increased uptake of F-18 FDG was seen in the bone marrow in both patients. In addition, markedly increased uptake in the spleen was noted in both, indicating that the spleen was the site of extramedullary hematopoiesis. The patients had no evidence of splenic metastases. The first patient had a history of irradiation to the dorsal spine, which was less responsive to G-CSF administration than was the nonirradiated lumbar spine.
Five Patients with evaluable malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) of bone (three with primary tumor and two with primary tumor and metastatic disease) were treated with preoperative chemotherapy including high dose methotrexate (HDMTX) with citrovorum factor rescue (CFR) as is used for patients with osteogenic sarcoma. All five patients demonstrated a clinical response to chemotherapy. Three of four patients who underwent surgery had complete responses and one patient had greater than 90% tumor necrosis as documented by histologic examination of the resected primary tumor. All four patients who underwent surgery following preoperative chemotherapy are surviving free of disease from one to six years from the start of treatment; chemotherapy was discontinued after six to 11 months in these patients. The median disease‐free survival time is 31.5 months. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of chemotherapy in MFH of bone, and in particular the effectiveness of HDMTX with CFR which caused measurable responses in all patients while receiving this therapy as a single agent.
This report describes the clinical and roentgenographic features of a pleuritis seen following the administration of high‐dose methotrexate (HDMTX). Among 210 patients who received 3130 courses of HDMTX from 1977 through 1980, the incidence of this clinical entity was 8.5% (n = 18). The sudden onset of chest pain occurred only after the third or fourth HDMTX treatment and usually lasted between three and five days; the pain was often quite severe and led to extensive clinical examination before recognition of the benign transient nature of this syndrome. Roentgenographic examination of the chest revealed thickening of the intra lobar pleura, most prominent on the right side. Our observations support the hypothesis that this adverse drug reaction occurs more frequently than assumed, but is often ignored or misinterpreted.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.