Our data first show that ED is a powerful predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in diabetic patients with silent CAD and that the treatment with statins and 5-PDE inhibitors might reduce the occurrence of MACE among CAD diabetic patients with ED.

Background-Erectile dysfunction (ED) is associated with coronary artery disease (CAD). In diabetic patients, CAD is often silent. Among diabetic patients with silent CAD, the prevalence of ED has never been evaluated. We investigated whether ED is associated with asymptomatic CAD in type 2 diabetic patients. Methods and Results-We evaluated the prevalence of ED in 133 uncomplicated diabetic men with angiographically verified silent CAD and in 127 diabetic men without myocardial ischemia at exercise ECG, 48-hour ambulatory ECG, and stress echocardiography. The groups were comparable for age and diabetes duration. Patients were screened for ED using the validated International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire. The prevalence of ED was significantly higher in patients with than in those without silent CAD (33.8% versus 4.7%; Pϭ0.000). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that ED, apolipoprotein(a) polymorphism, smoking, microalbuminuria, HDL, and LDL were significantly associated with silent CAD; among these risk factors, ED appeared to be the most efficient predictor of silent CAD (OR, 14.8; 95% CI, 3.8 to 56.9). Conclusions-Our study first shows a strong and independent association between ED and silent CAD in apparently uncomplicated type 2 diabetic patients. If our findings are confirmed, ED may become a potential marker to identify diabetic patients to screen for silent CAD. Moreover, the high prevalence of ED among diabetics with silent CAD suggests the need to perform an exercise ECG before starting a treatment for ED, especially in patients with additional cardiovascular risk factors.

The present study shows that hypertension is frequent in HIV patients on HAART and that hypertension appears to be linked to insulin resistance; in particular, hypertension seems to be a part of the metabolic syndrome.

OBJECTIVE -In patients with uncomplicated diabetes, there is low probability of finding significant coronary artery disease (CAD) by noninvasive tests. Therefore, screening for its presence is not justified, and it is important to find reliable predictors of silent CAD to identify patients with uncomplicated diabetes for further screening. The relationship between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] polymorphism, and silent CAD has never been studied. We investigated the association of Lp(a) and apo(a) polymorphism with angiographically documented asymptomatic CAD in type 2 diabetic patients without evident complications. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-A total of 1,323 diabetic patients without any clinical and electrocardiographic evidence of CAD were evaluated. Of 121 patients with highly positive results of exercise electrocardiography (ECG) (n ϭ 30) or positive results on exercise thallium scintigraphy (n ϭ 91), 103 subjects showed angiographically documented CAD (CAD group). Of 1,106 patients with negative results on exercise ECG, 103 subjects without CAD (NO CAD group) were selected and matched by age, gender, and duration of diabetes to patients in the CAD group. In patients in the NO CAD group, results of exercise ECG, 48-h ambulatory ECG, and stress echocardiography were negative for CAD.RESULTS -The CAD group had higher Lp(a) levels (21.7 Ϯ 17.7 vs. 15.2 Ϯ 19.0 mg/dl; P ϭ 0.0093) than the NO CAD group, and a percentage of subjects had at least one small apo(a) isoform (68.9 vs. 29.1%; P ϭ 0.0000) higher than the NO CAD group. Logistic regression analysis showed that apo(a) phenotypes (odds ratio [OR] 8.13, 95% CI 3.65-21.23), microalbuminuria (5.38, 2.44 -11.88), smoking (2.72, 1.31-5.64), and Lp(a) levels (2.41, 1.15-5.03) were predictors of asymptomatic CAD. CONCLUSIONS -Our investigation reports the first evidence of an independent association of Lp(a) and apo(a) polymorphism with asymptomatic CAD. This suggests that Lp(a) levels and apo(a) phenotypes could be used together with other risk factors as markers of asymptomatic CAD in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 25:1418 -1424, 2002D iabetes is associated with a more than threefold-increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) (1). In patients with diabetes, CAD is often asymptomatic (2-4). Asymptomatic CAD is a strong predictor of future coronary events and early death, especially in patients with diabetes (5,6). Early identification of diabetic patients with silent CAD can allow reduction of mortality and morbidity for cardiovascular events (7,8). In patients with uncomplicated diabetes, there is low probability of finding significant CAD by noninvasive tests. Therefore, screening for its presence is not justified (2), and it is important to find reliable predictors of silent CAD to identify patients with uncomplicated diabetes for further screening.Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a powerful risk factor for CAD (9). Recent studies report that the polymorphism of the specific apolipoprotein of Lp(a), called apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)], ...

No abstract

Our data suggest that Lp(a) levels and apo(a) phenotypes are independently associated with CAD in Type 2 diabetic patients; thus both these parameters may be helpful in selecting diabetic subjects at high genetic cardiovascular risk. However, Lp(a) levels and apo(a) polymorphism seem to be cardiovascular risk factors less important in diabetic than in non-diabetic subjects. Diabet. Med. 18, 589-594 (2001)

The impact of the screening for asymptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) on the cardiovascular prognosis in diabetes is controversial. The aim of the study was to investigate whether screening for asymptomatic CAD can have an impact on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in diabetes. In this nonrandomized longitudinal study, 1,189 consecutive type 2 diabetic patients without a history of CAD were evaluated. They were subdivided into two groups according to whether they were screened (screening group, n = 921) or not (no-screening group, n = 268) for asymptomatic CAD. Among the screened patients, 386 had angiographically proven CAD (CAD group) and 535 did not have silent CAD (no-CAD group). During a mean follow-up period of 4.3 ± 1.9 years, 130 patients experienced major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The incidence of MACE was significantly greater in the no-screening than in the screening group (22.0 vs. 7.7%; p = 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier method showed that: (1) the screening was associated with a lower rate of MACE (log-rank test, 3-95; p = 0.047); (2) the no-screening group had a risk profile similar to that of CAD group (log-rank test, 2.02; p = 0.154); and (3) cardiovascular prognosis was significantly better in no-CAD than in no-screening group (log-rank test, 4.27; p = 0.039). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that screening for CAD (HR 0.2; 95% CI 0.2-0.3; p = 0.000) was significantly protective against the occurrence of MACE. Our data suggest that screening for asymptomatic CAD can significantly reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in type 2 diabetic patients. This may be due to specific diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in diabetic patients with proven CAD at screening.

No abstract