dle ear effusion, led to a decrease in intracochlear ECoG signal amplitudes. This was not attributable to changes of cochlear function. All persistent reductions in ECoG response magnitude after normalization of the tympanogram occurred during the first week following implantation. Thresholds of ECoG signals were at or below hearing thresholds in all cases. Conclusion: Gross intracochlear trauma during surgery appears to be rare. In the early postoperative phase the ability to assess cochlear status by ECoG recordings was limited due to the regular occurrence of middle ear effusion. Still, intracochlear ECoG along with tympanogram recordings suggests that any changes of low-frequency cochlear function occur mainly during the first week after cochlear implantation. ECoG seems to be a promising tool to objectively assess changes in cochlear function in cochlear implant recipients and may allow further insight into the mechanisms underlying the loss of residual hearing.

No abstract

OBJECTIVE: To monitor changes in cochlear function during cochlear implantation using electrocochleography (ECoG) and to correlate changes to postoperative hearing preservation. METHODS: ECoG responses to acoustic stimuli of 250, 500, and 1000 Hz were recorded during cochlear implantation. The recording electrode was placed on the promontory and stabilized to fix the position during cochlear implantation. Baseline recordings were obtained after completion of the posterior tympanotomy. Changes of the ongoing ECoG response at suprathreshold intensities were analyzed after full insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array. Audiometric tests were conducted before and 4 weeks after surgery and correlated with electrophysiological findings. RESULTS: Ninety-five percent (18/19) of cochlear implant subjects had measurable ECoG responses. Under unchanged conditions, recordings showed a high repeatability without significant differences between 2 recordings (p 0.01). Ninety-four percent (17/18) of subjects showed no relevant changes in ECoG recordings after insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array. One subject showed decreases in responses at all frequencies indicative of cochlear trauma. This was associated with a complete hearing loss 4 weeks after surgery compared with mean presurgical low-frequency hearing of 78 dB HL. CONCLUSION: Extracochlear ECoG is a reliable tool to assess cochlear function during cochlear implantation. Moderate threshold shifts could be caused by postoperative mechanisms or minor cochlear trauma. Detectable changes in extracochlear ECoG recordings, indicating gross cochlear trauma, are probably predictive of complete loss of residual acoustic hearing.

Objective: The aims of this study were: (1) To investigate the correlation between electrophysiological changes during cochlear implantation and postoperative hearing loss, and (2) to detect the time points that electrophysiological changes occur during cochlear implantation.Material and Methods: Extra- and intracochlear electrocochleography (ECoG) were used to detect electrophysiological changes during cochlear implantation. Extracochlear ECoG recordings were conducted through a needle electrode placed on the promontory; for intracochlear ECoG recordings, the most apical contact of the cochlear implant (CI) electrode itself was used as the recording electrode. Tone bursts at 250, 500, 750, and 1000 Hz were used as low-frequency acoustic stimuli and clicks as high-frequency acoustic stimuli. Changes of extracochlear ECoG recordings after full insertion of the CI electrode were correlated with pure-tone audiometric findings 4 weeks after surgery.Results: Changes in extracochlear ECoG recordings correlated with postoperative hearing change (r = −0.44, p = 0.055, n = 20). Mean hearing loss in subjects without decrease or loss of extracochlear ECoG signals was 12 dB, compared to a mean hearing loss of 22 dB in subjects with a detectable decrease or a loss of ECoG signals (p = 0.0058, n = 51). In extracochlear ECoG recordings, a mean increase of the ECoG signal of 4.4 dB occurred after opening the cochlea. If a decrease of ECoG signals occurred during insertion of the CI electrode, the decrease was detectable during the second half of the insertion.Conclusion: ECoG recordings allow detection of electrophysiological changes in the cochlea during cochlear implantation. Decrease of extracochlear ECoG recordings during surgery has a significant correlation with hearing loss 4 weeks after surgery. Trauma to cochlear structures seems to occur during the final phase of the CI electrode insertion. Baseline recordings for extracochlear ECoG recordings should be conducted after opening the cochlea. ECoG responses can be recorded from an intracochlear site using the CI electrode as recording electrode. This technique may prove useful for monitoring cochlear trauma intraoperatively in the future.

The malleus and incus in the human middle ear are linked by the incudo-malleolar joint (IMJ). The mobility of the human IMJ under physiologically relevant acoustic stimulation and its functional role in middle-ear sound transmission are still debated. In this study, spatial stapes motions were measured during acoustic stimulation (0.25-8 kHz) in six fresh human temporal bones for two conditions of the IMJ: (1) normal IMJ and (2) IMJ with experimentally-reduced mobility. Stapes velocity was measured at multiple points on the footplate using a scanning laser Doppler vibrometry (SLDV) system, and the 3D motion components were calculated under both conditions of the IMJ. The artificial reduction of the IMJ mobility was confirmed by measuring the relative motion between the malleus and the incus. The magnitudes of the piston-like motion of the stapes increased with the reduced IMJ mobility above 2 kHz. The increase was frequency dependent and was prominent from 2 to 4 kHz and at 5.5 kHz. The magnitude ratios of the rocking-like motions to the piston-like motion were similar for both IMJ conditions. The frequency-dependent change of the piston-like motion after the reduction of the IMJ mobility suggests that the IMJ is mobile under physiologically relevant levels of acoustic stimulation, especially at frequencies above 2 kHz. The malleus and incus in the human middle ear are linked by the incudo-malleolar joint 10 (IMJ). The mobility of the human IMJ under physiologically relevant acoustic stimulation and 11 its functional role in middle-ear sound transmission are still debated. In this study, spatial 12 stapes motions were measured during acoustic stimulation (0.25-8 kHz) in six fresh human 13 temporal bones for two conditions of the IMJ: (1) normal IMJ and (2) IMJ with 14 experimentally-reduced mobility. Stapes velocity was measured at multiple points on the 15 footplate using a scanning laser Doppler vibrometry (SLDV) system, and the 3D motion 16 components were calculated under both conditions of the IMJ. The artificial reduction of the 17 IMJ mobility was confirmed by measuring the relative motion between the malleus and the 18 incus. The magnitudes of the piston-like motion of the stapes increased with the reduced IMJ 19 mobility above 2 kHz. The increase was frequency dependent and was prominent from 2-4 20 kHz and at 5.5 kHz. The magnitude ratios of the rocking-like motions to the piston-like 21 motion were similar for both IMJ conditions. The frequency-dependent change of the piston-22 like motion after the reduction of the IMJ mobility suggests that the IMJ is mobile under 23 physiologically relevant levels of acoustic stimulation, especially at frequencies above 2 kHz. 24 2

Objectives: (1) To correlate simultaneously recorded intra-and extracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) signals during electrode insertion into the cochlea, (2) to track changes in the ECochG signal during insertion and removal of an electrode, and (3) to correlate the findings with the preoperative residual hearing. We hypothesized that intracochlear ECochG recordings show signal changes not reflected in simultaneous extracochlear ECochG recordings. Design: During cochlear implantation in human cochlear implant recipients, a short, slim, custom-made electrode was inserted and removed in a stepwise manner. At each step, ECochG recordings were simultaneously recorded by an extracochlear electrode near the round window and via the inserted electrode. The acoustic stimulus was a 500 Hz tone burst at 110 to 130 dB SPL. Results: The mean amplitude difference between intra-and extracochlear ongoing ECochG responses was 14 dB (range 9 to 24 dB; n = 10) at the beginning of insertion. Intracochlear ECochG responses were larger in all cases. Extracochlear ECochG responses remained stable while intracochlear recordings showed large variations regarding amplitude and phase during the electrode array insertion. Intracochlear signal changes during insertion were reversible with retraction of the electrode. There were only weak to moderate (rs = 0.006 to 0.4), nonsignificant correlations of residual preoperative hearing with maximum amplitudes and amplitude changes during electrode insertion and removal in intracochlear recordings. Conclusions: Signals in intracochlear ECochG recordings are reliably larger than ECochG signals recorded simultaneously from an extracochlear location. Intracochlear ECochG recordings show reversible amplitude and phase changes during insertion, not reflected in simultaneous extracochlear ECochG recordings. Such changes are most likely due to the movement of the recording electrode in relation to the signal generators. Residual high-frequency hearing is associated with larger ECochG signal amplitudes. Modeling of expected intracochlear ECochG changes during electrode insertions may allow detection of cochlear trauma in the future.

No abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of vestibular schwannoma (VS) leads to acute ipsilateral vestibular loss if there is residual vestibular function before surgery. To overcome the sequelae of acute ipsilateral vestibular loss and to decrease postoperative recovery time, the concept of preemptive vestibular ablation with gentamicin and vestibular prehabilitation before surgery has been developed (“vestibular prehab”). OBJECTIVE: Studying postural stability during walking and handicap of dizziness over a 1-year follow-up period in VS patients undergoing vestibular prehab before surgical treatment of VS. METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients with a diagnosis of a VS undergoing surgical therapy from June 2012 to March 2018 was performed. All patients were included with documentation of the length of hospital duration and the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and the Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) assessed preoperatively as well as 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: A total 68 VS patients were included, of which 29 patients received preoperative vestibular ablation by intratympanic injection of gentamicin. Mean VS diameter was 20.2 mm (SD 9.4 mm) and mean age at surgery was 49.6 years (SD 11.5 years). Vestibular prehab had no effect on DHI and FGA at any time point studied. CONCLUSIONS: We found no effect of vestibular prehab on postural stability during walking and on the handicap of dizziness. These findings add to the body of knowledge consisting of conflicting results of vestibular prehab. Therefore, vestibular prehab should be applied only in selected cases in an experimental setting.