2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of the incudo-malleolar joint to middle-ear sound transmission

Abstract: The malleus and incus in the human middle ear are linked by the incudo-malleolar joint (IMJ). The mobility of the human IMJ under physiologically relevant acoustic stimulation and its functional role in middle-ear sound transmission are still debated. In this study, spatial stapes motions were measured during acoustic stimulation (0.25-8 kHz) in six fresh human temporal bones for two conditions of the IMJ: (1) normal IMJ and (2) IMJ with experimentally-reduced mobility. Stapes velocity was measured at multiple… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also possible that compliance in the incudomalleolar joint contributes significantly to a reduction in stapedial motion, and that this compliance may itself be nonlinear, taking up some displacement that might otherwise be transmitted to the cochlear fluid at high sound pressure levels (Hüttenbrink 1988, Lauxmann et al 2012). One recent report (Gerig et al 2015) finds that IM joint mobility is not a major contributor to ossicular chain compliance at frequencies below 2 kHz. We do not discount the possible contribution of the IM joint (or other components of the ossicular chain) to the nonlinearity observed in this study, but believe it to be of secondary importance at very low frequencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible that compliance in the incudomalleolar joint contributes significantly to a reduction in stapedial motion, and that this compliance may itself be nonlinear, taking up some displacement that might otherwise be transmitted to the cochlear fluid at high sound pressure levels (Hüttenbrink 1988, Lauxmann et al 2012). One recent report (Gerig et al 2015) finds that IM joint mobility is not a major contributor to ossicular chain compliance at frequencies below 2 kHz. We do not discount the possible contribution of the IM joint (or other components of the ossicular chain) to the nonlinearity observed in this study, but believe it to be of secondary importance at very low frequencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2014-0544). Preparation of the human temporal bone for ICSP measurements followed a standard surgical approach [41], [42]. Prior to drilling access to the inner ear, a standard conformity test of the ME was performed by quantifying the TBME-01353-2016 6 ME transfer function and comparing it to the ASTM practice ME standards [3], [43].…”
Section: Sensor Experiments In Human Temporal Bonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) was drilled approximately 2.5 mm beside the round window with a diamond burr of 0.7 mm diameter under water to prevent entry of air into the cochlea. A loudspeaker (ER-2, Etymotic Research, US) and a reference microphone (ER-7C, Etymotic Research, US) were placed into the artificial EC and acoustically sealed using a foam insert as done in earlier experiments [41], [42]. Acoustic excitation signals were generated by an audio analyzer (APx585 Audio Analyser, Audio Precision Inc., US) and amplified by an audio amplifier (RMX 850, QSC Audio Products, US).…”
Section: Sensor Experiments In Human Temporal Bonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As research has progressed, others have found that the IMJ displays a frequency-dependent mobility, becoming more mobile at higher frequencies (Guinan and Peake, 1967; Willi et al , 2002). Contemporary work has supported the idea that the IMJ is mobile at frequencies above 2 kHz (Gerig et al , 2015), as well as under quasi-static loading conditions (Ihrle et al , 2016). The ISJ has received relatively less scrutiny than the IMJ, though a number of studies have demonstrated that it is functionally mobile at hearing frequencies (Nakajima et al , 2005; Zhang and Gan, 2011) and that fixing it causes changes in sound transmission (Hato et al , 2003; Alian et al , 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%