BACKGROUND: Growing evidence suggests that piriform cortex resection during anterior temporal lobectomy is important for achieving good seizure outcome in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE). However, the relationship between seizure outcome and piriform cortex ablation during MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether ablation of piriform cortex was associated with seizure outcome in patients with mTLE undergoing MRgLITT. METHODS: We performed preablation and postablation volumetric analyses of hippocampus, amygdala, piriform cortex, and ablation volumes in patients with mTLE who underwent MRgLITT at our institution from 2014 to 2019. RESULTS: Thirty nine patients with mTLE were analyzed. In univariate logistic regression, percent piriform cortex ablation was associated with International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) class 1 at 6 months (odds ratio [OR] 1.051, 95% CI [1.001-1.117], P = .045), whereas ablation volume, percent amygdala ablation, and percent hippocampus ablation were not (P > .05). At 1 year, ablation volume was associated with ILAE class 1 (OR 1.608, 95% CI [1.071-2.571], P = .021) while percent piriform cortex ablation became a trend (OR 1.050, 95% CI [0.994-1.109], P = .054), and both percent hippocampus ablation and percent amygdala ablation were not significantly associated with ILAE class 1 (P > .05). In multivariable logistic regression, only percent piriform cortex ablation was a significant predictor of seizure freedom at 6 months (OR 1.085,], P = .019) and at 1 year (OR 1.074, 95% CI [1.003-1.178], P = .041). CONCLUSION: Piriform cortex ablation volume is associated with seizure outcome in patients with mTLE undergoing MRgLITT. The piriform cortex should be considered a high yield ablation target to achieve good seizure outcome.
OBJECTIVE Maximal safe ablation of target structures during magnetic resonance–guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLiTT) is critical to achieving good seizure outcome in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE). The authors sought to determine whether intraoperative physiological variables are associated with ablation volume during MRgLiTT. METHODS Patients with mTLE who underwent MRgLiTT at our institution from 2014 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Ablation volume was determined with volumetric analysis of intraoperative postablation MR images. Physiological parameters (systolic blood pressure [SBP], diastolic blood pressure [DBP], mean arterial pressure [MAP], end-tidal carbon dioxide [ETCO2]) measured 40 minutes prior to ablation were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine independent predictors of ablation volume. RESULTS Forty-four patients met the inclusion criteria. The median (interquartile range) ablation volume was 4.27 (2.92–5.89) cm3, and median ablation energy was 7216 (6402–8784) J. The median MAP, SBP, DBP, and ETCO2 values measured during the 40-minute period leading up to ablation were 72.8 (66.2–81.5) mm Hg, 104.4 (96.4–114.4) mm Hg, 62.4 (54.1–69.8) mm Hg, and 34.1 (32.0–36.2) mm Hg, respectively. In univariate analysis, only total laser energy (r = 0.464, p = 0.003) and 40-minute average ETCO2 (r = −0.388, p = 0.012) were significantly associated with ablation volume. In multivariate analysis, only ETCO2 ≤ 33 mm Hg (p = 0.001) was significantly associated with ablation volume. CONCLUSIONS Total ablation energy and ETCO2, but not blood pressure, may significantly affect ablation volume in mTLE patients undergoing MRgLiTT. Mild hypocapnia was associated with increased extent of ablation. Intraoperative monitoring and modulation of ETCO2 may help improve extent of ablation, prediction of ablation volume, and potentially seizure outcome.
Reported neuro-modulation schemes in the literature are typically classified as closed-loop or open-loop. A novel group of recently developed neuro-modulation devices may be better described as a neural bypass, which attempts to transmit neural data from one location of the nervous system to another.<strong> </strong>The most common form of neural bypasses in the literature utilize EEG recordings of cortical information paired with functional electrical stimulation for effector muscle output, most commonly for assistive applications and rehabilitation in spinal cord injury or stroke. Other neural bypass locations that have also been described, or may soon be in development, include cortical-spinal bypasses, cortical-cortical bypasses, autonomic bypasses, peripheral-central bypasses, and inter-subject bypasses. The most common recording devices include EEG, ECoG, and microelectrode arrays, while stimulation devices include both invasive and noninvasive electrodes. Several devices are in development to improve the temporal and spatial resolution and biocompatibility for neuronal recording and stimulation. A major barrier to entry includes neuroplasticity and current decoding mechanisms that regularly require retraining. Neural bypasses are a unique class of neuro-modulation. Continued advancement of neural recording and stimulating devices with high spatial and temporal resolution, combined with decoding mechanisms uninhibited by neuroplasticity, can expand the therapeutic capability of neural bypassing. Overall, neural bypasses are a promising modality to improve the treatment of common neurologic disorders, including stroke, spinal cord injury, peripheral nerve injury, brain injury and more.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.