Syndesmotic injuries are common in ankle fractures. Traditional syndesmosis fixation may be associated with a secondary procedure. When the posterior malleolus is fractured, the posterior syndesmotic ligaments may remain intact and attached to the fragment. Our goals were to establish the incidence of syndesmotic ligament ruptures in pronation-external rotation type ankle injuries associated with posterior malleolar fractures, and to assess syndesmotic stability after fixation of the posterior malleolus compared with using a syndesmotic screw. Fifteen patients who sustained pronation-external rotation Stage 4 ankle fractures that involved the posterior malleolus were evaluated using radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging. No complete tears of the posterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament occurred. A pronation-external rotation fracture pattern with a posterior malleolar fragment was created in 10 lower extremity cadaver specimens with random fixation of the posterior malleolus or the syndesmosis. Compared with the intact specimens, stiffness was restored to 70% after fixation of the posterior malleolus, and to 40% after syndesmosis stabilization. Syndesmotic stability may be obtained more effectively by fixation of the posterior malleolus rather than by using a syndesmotic screw. Although additional clinical investigation is warranted, these concepts may be useful in eliminating syndesmotic screw fixation in select patients.

No abstract

The current study identified a deficiency in the AOFAS score in evaluating functional ankle stability after the Broström-Gould procedure. A more meaningful analysis of outcomes can be expected using the SF-36 score. The data suggest that greater attention must be paid to functional rehabilitation after ankle stabilization surgery to obtain optimal outcome.

Several methods of obtaining ankle fusion have been described, with numerous studies reporting on patient populations with varied diagnoses and various methods of fixation. This has led to outcome analyses that are difficult to interpret. Our hypothesis is that using a standard method of fusion, without the aid of allograft, a solid ankle fusion can be achieved in patients with end-stage ankle arthritis, and that this outcome can be reflected in standardized outcome tools. Forty-one consecutive ankle fusions in 40 patients were included in our study, with a minimum followup of 3 years. All patients had an ankle arthrodesis using two parallel retrograde 7.3-mm screws and local fibular graft. All but two patients obtained a solid talocrural union (95%), with a mean postoperative improvement in the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score of 23 points. Results of our study showed that a simple technique based on sound mechanical and biologic principles can yield excellent outcomes for patients.

The use of additional screw fixation when performing an ankle arthrodesis does not sacrifice a major amount of the tibiotalar contact area and will most likely not affect the biologic environment needed to obtain fusion.

Early treatment with G-CSF after MI decreases ventricular dilatation, while delayed treatment has a deleterious effect on LV remodeling. This may be related to changes in myocardial vascularity. The effects of G-CSF therapy and its dose timing help to elucidate the results of recent human trials.

The centersurface method can quantify regional wall thickening and spatially identify regions of abnormal function in 3D after MI without relying on geometric assumptions. This method may be a valuable tool to quantify regional LV function in the assessment of myocardial viability, ischemia, infarction, and the response to therapeutic interventions.

No abstract