Pilocytic astrocytomas (PAs) are increasingly tested for KIAA1549-BRAF fusions. We used reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for the 3 most common KIAA1549-BRAF fusions, together with BRAF V600E and histone H3.3 K27M analyses to identify relationships of these molecular characteristics with clinical features in a cohort of 32 PA patients. In this group, the overall BRAF fusion detection rate was 24 (75%). Ten (42%) of the 24 had the 16-9 fusion, 8 (33%) had only the 15-9 fusion, and 1 (4%) of the patients had only the 16-11 fusion. In the PAs with only the 15-9 fusion, 1 PA was in the cerebellum and 7 were centered in the midline outside of the cerebellum, that is, in the hypothalamus (n = 4), optic pathways (n = 2), and brainstem (n = 1). Tumors within the cerebellum were negatively associated with fusion 15-9. Seven (22%) of the 32 patients had tumor-related deaths and 25 of the patients (78%) were alive between 2 and 14 years after initial biopsy. Age, sex, tumor location, 16-9 fusion, and 15-9 fusion were not associated with overall survival. Thus, in this small cohort, 15-9 KIAA1549-BRAF fusion was associated with midline PAs located outside of the cerebellum; these tumors, which are generally difficult to resect, are prone to recurrence.
To support the global restart of elective surgery, data from an international prospective cohort study of 8492 patients (69 countries) was analysed using artificial intelligence (machine learning techniques) to develop a predictive score for mortality in surgical patients with SARS-CoV-2. We found that patient rather than operation factors were the best predictors and used these to create the COVIDsurg Mortality Score (https://covidsurgrisk.app). Our data demonstrates that it is safe to restart a wide range of surgical services for selected patients.
INTRODUCTION. Rebiopsy rates as high as 12% have been reported in previous studies of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL). This can lead to secondary operations, increasing risks of morbidity to the patient and costs for the NHS. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) testing for clonality in haematological malignancies has been applied to cases of lymphoma outwith the central nervous system (CNS), but is less commonly used in the diagnosis of CNS lymphomas. Clonality in B- and T-cell populations may indicate the presence of malignancy. We aimed to identify factors to reduce the rebiopsy rate in PCNSL. METHODS. We examined a cohort of 102 suspected cerebral lymphoma cases biopsied at Frenchay Hospital, Bristol over a 10-year period (2000-2010). Clinical data, including age, sex, location, pre-biopsy steroid use, the need for rebiopsy and histological diagnosis, were collected. We retrospectively reviewed rebiopsied cases and they subsequently underwent PCR testing for clonality. RESULTS. Overall, 96/102 (94%) cases achieved a histological diagnosis after one or more biopsies. 81/96 (84%) of these were lymphomas involving the brain and 15/96 (16%) were spinal lymphomas. The majority of these were B-cell lymphomas (95/96 (99%)), with one case of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (1/96 (1%)). Due to insufficient histological evidence of PCNSL after the first biopsy, 9/102 (9%) of cases had required rebiopsy. In 7/9 (78%) of these cases, we undertook PCR testing for clonality on tissue from the first biopsy. We found 3/7 (43%) cases were monoclonal for B or T populations, raising the possibility of PCNSL. CONCLUSIONS. We recommend that all CNS lymphoproliferative lesions be assessed by haematopathologists, with the inclusion of PCR testing particularly in equivocal cases. This would reduce the number of patients going for rebiopsy and reduce the patient morbidity and costs for the NHS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.