Purpose How does corporate downsizing contribute to a firm’s long-term value? While the extant empirical findings on this relationship are inconclusive, contradictory and equivocal, the answers to this question remain particularly important in today’s business environment. Considering that downsizing is often directed toward long-term growth and survival, this paper aims to posit that scholars should account for the temporal nature of this strategic decision to understand its economic impact on the firm’s operations. Therefore, this paper provides a more rigorous empirical examination of how a firm’s decision to downsize its workforce affects that firm’s long-term value. Design/methodology/approach This paper used Wibbens and Siggelkow’s (2020) measure of long-term investor value appropriation (LIVA) to directly observe the effects of corporate downsizing on firm long-term value and growth. Using a sample of 3,149 US publicly traded manufacturing firms that operated between 2002 to 2018, this paper tested the main effect of downsizing on LIVA and 3 boundary condition hypotheses. Findings This paper found a positive relationship between corporate downsizing and a firm’s long-term value. Interestingly, this positive relationship is stronger among firms that had high human resource slack and R&D intensity. Contrary to the expectations, this paper did not find support for the moderation effect of the proximity to bankruptcy on the relationship between corporate downsizing and a firm’s long-term value. Originality/value With these findings, the paper sheds light on the long-term implications of a firm’s decision to downsize its workforce.

Purpose Management research has emphasized the effects of slack resources on the decision-makers’ strategic choices. Behavioral theorists have argued for a positive effect of slack through encouraging search and innovation while agency theorists have emphasized that slack can accentuate the principal–agent problem, which negatively affects firm performance. This paper aims to extend this argument and empirically investigate the separate effects of three types of slack resources (i.e. available, recoverable and potential) on firm performance in an important emerging market, namely, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). Design/methodology/approach The two-step system generalized method of moments (Sys-GMM) is applied to a panel of 360 firms in the six GCC countries, namely, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Oman and Bahrain, over the period between 1999 and 2019. Findings The authors find that available and potential slack are both negatively associated with firm performance. The relationship between recoverable slack and performance is quadratic (inverse U-shaped) where recoverable slack improves performance only up to a specific point, but after that level, recoverable slack starts to negatively affect the performance of the firm. Originality/value This paper contributes to the literature in three important ways. First, this paper advances a first attempt to differentiate between three separate types of slack on firm performance in the context of the GCC market. Second, this paper empirically investigates the presence of the principal–agent problem in the GCC market and relates it to the ongoing debate on the agency effects of slack resources. Finally, this paper underlines the effects of institutional frameworks and environments on the relationship between slack resources and firm performance.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract