This study was a experiment research. The hypothesis of this study were the differences in learning outcomes with the use of reading comprehension PQRST method (preview, question, read, summerize, test) in the text reading Indonesia subjects were given to students. The research conducted at the seventh grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Bontomatene Selayar islands regency academic year 2014/2015 and the number of students 40 people. The research data obtained from the test result of learning to see the success of student learning after learning method PQRST (preview, question, read, summerize, test). The results showed that students who scored above 70 increases. Based on the results of the research, concluded that learning reading comprehension in reading texts using PQRST (Preview, Question, Read, summerize, Test) and without using meode there was a difference in student learning outcomes. PQRST learning method (Preview, Question, Read, summerize, Test) is effective. AbstrakPenelitian ini adalah Eksperimen. Hipotesis penelitian ini adalah bahwa ada perbedaan hasil belajar membaca pemahaman dengan penggunaan metode PQRST (preview, question, read, summerize, test) dalam teks bacaan mata pelajaran Indonesia yang diberikan kepada siswa. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan pada siswa kelas VII SMP Negeri 1 Bontomatene Kabupaten Kepulauan Selayar tahun ajaran 2014/2015 dan jumlah siswa 40 orang. Data penelitian ini diperoleh dari tes hasil belajar untuk melihat keberhasilan belajar siswa setelah pembelajaran menggunakan metode PQRST (preview, question, read, summerize, test). Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa siswa yang memperoleh nilai diatas 70 meningkat. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, disimpulkan bahwa Pembelajaran membaca pemahaman pada teks bacaan dengan menggunakan metode PQRST (Preview, Question, Read, Summerize, Test) dan tanpa menggunakan meode terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar siswa. Pembelajaran menggunakan metode PQRST (Preview, Question, Read, Summerize, Test) efektif.Kata Kunci: metode PQRST, membaca, dan membaca pemahaman.
Repetition plays an important role in an essay because it functions to connect one proposition to another in an essay. However, junior high school students as writers are still often found using repetition markers that do not show a clear function as a means of affirmation and their appearance in student essays tend to be boring for readers. This study aims to identify and explore the form of using repetition as a marker of propositional relations in junior high school students' essays. This research uses a qualitative approach and is categorized into the type of discourse analysis research. This study involved 94 eighth grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Balikpapan as research subjects. The data in this study were collected using a technique as proposed by (Sudaryanto, 2015), namely the simak-catat technique and interview technique. The data analysis of this research consisted of three stages, namely data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results of this study indicate that there are three types of repetition that are utilized as a means to link one proposition to another in the research subject's essay, namely exactly the same repetition, repetition with shapeshifting, and repetition with a partial disappearance. Among the three categories, exactly the same repetition is dominantly used so that it becomes the hallmark of the research subject's essay. The repetition of elements of the proposition that is repeated is also found in the essay of the research subject, causing boredom or redundancy. The findings of this study have an important contribution for teachers and education practitioners to optimize the literacy culture and students' critical thinking so that they are skilled in using repetition as a marker of propositional relations in written language.
The gender role of a person, whether male or female, depends on the cultural values that develop in the classroom. In the patriarchal class, from the start the gender roles of male students were more dominant than girls, so there was a comparison of gender roles and in turn, men were considered more powerful than women in the class. However, poststructuralism discourse analysis views men's and women's rights equally. This paper reveals that there are differences between male and female students, as seen from the results of the analysis during class discussions. Poststructuralism discourse analysis provides equal rights and research is carried out naturally, without favoritism in learning. The teacher allows the discussion to take place so that it is clear that there is no teacher domination of male and female students.
Facebook is widely claimed to have an important influence on students' writing skills, but studies on its impact on students' descriptive writing skills, especially in the first grade, are still very limited by previous researchers. Because of the scarcity of studies, this study attempts to measure the effect of social media Facebook on the descriptive writing skills of first-year students. 35 students from the Indonesian Language and Literature Education Study Program aged between 16-18 years were involved in this study as research subjects. They were selected after taking the Indonesian Language Competency Test (UKBI) and the range of scores obtained was high (75-79.9%). Non-random sampling was used to select research subjects. This study used a one group pretest-posttest experimental design. The data in this study were obtained from pretest and posttest activities using a descriptive writing skill test instrument. Data analysis was carried out using SPSS for Windows version 25. The results of this study indicate that the average score of students before the Facebook social media intervention was 61.43 and after the intervention, the average score obtained was 83.03. Meanwhile, based on the one-sample t-test, it shows that Facebook has a significant effect on students' description writing skills. The implication of the findings of this study is that Facebook is a social media that can be an ideal and comfortable learning tool that can lead students to develop better descriptive writing skills in higher education.
The main problem in this study is whether there is a difference in the application of problem-based learning models and direct learning to mathematics learning outcomes in seventh grade students of UPT SMP Negeri 15 Selayar Islands. This study aims to determine the differences in the application of problem-based learning models and direct learning to mathematics learning outcomes in seventh grade students of UPT SMP Negeri 15 Selayar Islands. This type of research is an experimental study involving two classes, namely the experimental class and the control class. This research refers to the learning outcomes of mathematics. The design used in this study is a nonequivalent control group design. The research sample amounted to 64 students. The data analysis technique used is descriptive statistical analysis and inferential statistics using t-test.The results showed that after going through the application of the problem-based learning model, the results of the data analysis of students' mathematics learning outcomes were in the very good category, with an average score of 80% in the experimental class and the results of data analysis of students' mathematics learning outcomes were in the good category with an average score. an average of 70% in the control class. The results of the analysis with the t-test of the results of hypothesis testing using SPSS version 25 software obtained Sig , ie 0.000 0.05 so that H_0 is rejected and H_1 is accepted. This shows that there are differences in the application of problem-based learning models to students' mathematics learning outcomes. The results of observation of student activities 91% of students who actively participate in the mathematics learning process and 94% of students who give a positive response to the application of problem-based learning models (PBM), the implementation of mathematics learning with problem-based learning models with an average of 3.883% of the ideal score of 4, 0. From the results of this study, it can be concluded that there are differences in the application of problem-based learning models and direct learning to mathematics learning outcomes in class VII students of UPT SMP Negeri 15 Selayar Islands in learning mathematics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.