Purpose The aim of the study was to determine the impact of telephone follow-up calls on satisfaction in oncology patients after hospital discharge. Method A randomized controlled study, in which patients were randomized into two groups: The experimental group with the telephone follow-up (TFU) calls (intervention) and the control group (no intervention). The telephone follow-up call was conducted within 72 h after discharge. During the call, patients were asked about their medications, namely, whether they received them, understood how to take them, and whether they developed any medication-related adverse effect. Both groups were contacted by phone two weeks later to assess their satisfaction with the discharge medication instructions and the provided pharmaceutical services, using the 5-point Likert scale. In addition, hospital records were reviewed for emergency room visits and hospital readmissions within 30 days after discharge. Results There was no difference in the percentage of patients who reported being very satisfied between both the intervention and the control groups (45% intervention vs. 48% control, P = 0.68). The mean time of the intervention phone call was 3 ± 1.7 (SD) min. During the telephone follow-up call, medication-related problems were identified in 20% of the patients. There was no significant difference in emergency room visits and hospital readmissions in the intervention group vs. control (44% vs. 53%, P = 0.123) and (37% vs. 43%, P = 0.317), respectively. Conclusion Telephone follow-up calls conducted by a pharmacist to discharged oncology patients did not improve patients' satisfaction, emergency room visits or hospital readmissions; however, they helped to identify medication-related adverse effects in the oncology patients.
BackgroundThe effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) was demonstrated in five landmark trials published in2015.Mechanical thrombectomy is now standard of care for acute ischemic stroke and has been growing in popularity after publication of landmark trials.ObjectiveTo analyze outcomes and trends of the use of MT and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke in US hospitals before and after publication of these trials.MethodsPatients discharged with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke between 2012 to 2017 were diagnosed using ICD codes from the National Inpatient Sample. Thereafter, patients given acute stroke treatment were identified using the corresponding procedure codes for IVT and MT. The primary clinical outcomes of in-hospital mortality and disability were then compared between two time periods: 2012–2014 (pre-landmark trials) and 2015–2017 (post-landmark trials). Binary logistic regression and Χ2 tests were used for statistical analysis.ResultsA total of 57 675 patients (median age 68.9 years (range 18-90), 50.1% female) were identified with acute procedures. Of these patients, 57.6% were from the post-landmark trials time period. Despite an increased number of cases, the rate of IVT decreased from 84.3% to 75.9% and the rate of IVT+MT decreased from 7.1% to 6.3%. After publication of the pivotal trials in 2015, the rates of MT increased from 8.7% to 17.8%. Significant reductions of in-hospital mortality (7.1% vs 8.7%, p<0.001) and disability (64% vs 66.2%, p<0.001) were noted.ConclusionThe analysis showed a significant increase in the proportion of patients receiving MT after 2015. This has translated into reduction of in-hospital mortality and improvement in disability.
Background and Purpose The Penumbra JET 7 reperfusion catheter is used in the revascularization of large vessel occlusions in acute ischemic stroke. Description of its use in clinical practice remains limited. Our purpose is to describe our initial experience with the Penumbra JET 7 reperfusion catheter and to report on its safety and efficacy in different thrombectomy techniques. Materials and Methods We conducted a retrospective study of 50 patients treated with thrombectomy using the Penumbra JET 7 reperfusion catheter. Mean patient age and admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale were 70.6 and 17.76, respectively. The most common sites of vessel occlusion were the M1 segment (72%) followed by distal internal carotid artery (14%). Thrombectomy was performed using the direct aspiration first-pass technique and/or aspiration in conjunction with a stent retriever. Results Revascularization was achieved in a total of 44 cases (88%). Successful navigation of the Penumbra JET 7 reperfusion catheter to the occlusion site with clot engagement was achieved in 94% of cases. Mean time from vascular access to revascularization was 31.60 min. No catheter-related complications occurred. Clinical outcome data were collected from 43 patients (86%). Of those patients, 51% achieved good outcome (modified Rankin score of 0–2) at 60 or more days follow-up, 28% had poor outcome (modified Rankin score of 3–5), and 9 patients died (21%). Conclusion The use of the Penumbra JET 7 reperfusion catheter for treatment of acute ischemic stroke was observed to be safe and effective with appropriate revascularization outcomes in different thrombectomy techniques.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.