Purpose: to test the effect of stone entrapment on laser lithotripsy efficiency. Materials and Methods: Spherical stone phantoms were created using the BegoStone® plaster. Lithotripsy of one stone (1.0g) per test jar was performed with Ho:YAG laser (365µm fiber; 1 minute/trial). Four laser settings were tested: I-0.8J,8Hz; II-0.2J,50Hz; III-0.5J,50Hz; IV-1.5J,40Hz. Uro-Net (US Endoscopy) deployment was used in 3/9 trials. Post-treatment, stone fragments were strained though a 1mm sieve; after a 7-day drying period fragments and unfragmented stone were weighed. Uro-Net nylon mesh and wire frame resistance were tested (laser fired for 30s). All nets used were evaluated for functionality and strength (compared to 10 new nets). Student's T test was used to compare the studied parameters; significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Laser settings I and II caused less damage to the net overall; the mesh and wire frame had worst injuries with setting IV; setting III had an intermediate outcome; 42% of nets were rendered unusable and excluded from strength analysis. There was no difference in mean strength between used functional nets and non-used devices (8.05 vs. 7.45 lbs, respectively; p = 0.14). Setting IV was the most efficient for lithotripsy (1.9 ± 0.6 mg/s; p < 0.001) with or without net stabilization; setting III was superior to I and II only if a net was not used. Conclusions: Laser lithotripsy is not optimized by stone entrapment with a net retrieval device which may be damaged by high energy laser settings.
When interpreting mammography, breast radiologists may identify radiopaque densities in the axilla on the mediolateral oblique or lateral projections. When such densities are encountered, true calcifications must be differentiated from pseudocalcifications (artifact). Using imaging, breast radiologists should be able to localize the finding as being dermal, within the soft tissues, within a lymph node, or intramuscular. By combining the anatomic location with the clinical presentation and any other imaging findings, breast radiologists will be able to determine the most appropriate management.
Objective To investigate the utility of texture analysis in detecting osseous changes associated with hyperparathyroidism on neck CT examinations compared with control patients and to explore the best regions in the head and neck to evaluate changes in the trabecular architecture secondary to hyperparathyroidism. Methods Patients with hyperparathyroidism who underwent a 4D CT of the neck with contrast were included in this study. Age-matched control patients with no history of hyperparathyroidism who underwent a contrast-enhanced neck CT were also included. Mandibular condyles, bilateral mandibular bodies, the body of the C4 vertebra, the manubrium of the sternum, and bilateral clavicular heads were selected for analysis, and oval-shaped regions of interest were manually placed. These segmented areas were imported into an in-house developed texture analysis program, and 41 texture analysis features were extracted. A mixed linear regression model was used to compare differences in the texture analysis features contoured at each of the osseous structures between patients with hyperparathyroidism and age-matched control patients. Results A total of 30 patients with hyperparathyroidism and 30 age-matched control patients were included in this study. Statistically significant differences in texture features between patients with hyperparathyroidism and control patients in all 8 investigated osseous regions. The sternum showed the greatest number of texture features with statistically significant differences between these groups. Conclusions Some CT texture features demonstrated statistically significant differences between patients with hyperparathyroidism and control patients. The results suggest that texture features may discriminate changes in the osseous architecture of the head and neck in patients with hyperparathyroidism.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.