Based on 1-km land surface model geophysical predictions within the United States Southern Great Plains (Red-Arkansas River basin), an observing system simulation experiment (OSSE) is carried out to assess the impact of land surface heterogeneity, instrument error, and parameter uncertainty on soil moisture products derived from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Hydrosphere State (Hydros) mission. Simulated retrieved soil moisture products are created using three distinct retrieval algorithms based on the characteristics of passive microwave measurements expected from Hydros. The accuracy of retrieval products is evaluated through comparisons with benchmark soil moisture fields obtained from direct aggregation of the original simulated soil moisture fields. The analysis provides a quantitative description of how land surface heterogeneity, instrument error, and inversion parameter uncertainty impacts propagate through the measurement and retrieval process to degrade the accuracy of Hydros soil moisture products. Results demonstrate that the discrete set of error sources captured by the OSSE induce root mean squared errors of between 2.0% and 4.5% volumetric in soil moisture retrievals within the basin. Algorithm robustness is also evaluated for the case of artificially enhanced vegetation water content () values within the basin. For large (3 kg m 2), a distinct positive bias, attributable to the impact of sub-footprint-scale landcover heterogeneity, is identified in soil moisture retrievals. Prospects for the removal of this bias via a correction strategy for inland water and/or the implementation of an alternative aggregation strategy for surface vegetation and roughness parameters are discussed.
The underlying mean and variance properties of surface net radiation, soil heat flux, and sensible‐latent heat fluxes are examined over the densely instrumented grassland region encompassing the First ISLSCP Field Experiment (FIFE). Twenty‐two surface flux stations at 20 sites were deployed during the four 1987 intensive field campaigns (IFCs). Flux variability is addressed together with the problem of scaling up to area‐averaged fluxes. Successful parameterization of area‐averaged fluxes in atmospheric models is based on accounting for internal spatial and temporal scales correctly. Mean and variance properties of fluxes are examined in both daily and diurnally averaged frameworks. Results are compared and contrasted for clear and cloudy situations and checked for the influence of surface‐induced biophysical controls (burn and grazing treatments) and topographic controls (slope factors and aspect ratios). Examination of the sensitivity of domain‐averaged fluxes to different averaging procedures demonstrates that this may be an important consideration. The results reveal six key features of the 1987 surface fluxes: (1) cloudiness variability and ample rainfall throughout the growing season led to near‐consistency in flux magnitudes during the first three IFCs; (2) burn treatment, grazing conditions, and topography have clearly delineated influences on the diurnal cycle flux amplitudes but do not alter the evaporative fraction significantly; (3) cloudiness is the major control on flux variability in terms of both mean and variance properties but has little impact on the Bowen ratio or evaporative fraction; (4) spatial weighting of fluxes based on a biophysicaltopographical cross stratification generates a measurable bias with respect to straight arithmetic averaging (up to 20 W m−2 in available heating); (5) structure function analysis demonstrates significant underlying spatial autocorrelation structure in the fluxes, but the observed distance dependence is due to cloudiness controls, not surface controls; (6) Monte Carlo analysis of high resolution vegetation indices obtained from SPOT satellite measurements suggest that the mean domain amplitudes of the diurnal sensible and latent heat flux cycles can be biased up to 30–40 W m −2 by repositioning the 20 site locations within the experimental domain.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.