, and the EPIPAGE Study GroupThe EPIPAGE Study Group (listed in the Appendix)Objective To assess the relationship between cigarette smoking during pregnancy and very preterm births, according to the main mechanisms of preterm birth. Design Case -control study (the French Epipage study).Setting Regionally defined population of births in France.Population Eight hundred and sixty-four very preterm live-born singletons (between 27 and 32 completed weeks of gestation) and 567 unmatched full-term controls. Methods Data from the French Epipage study were analysed using a polytomous logistic regression model to control for social and demographic characteristics, pre-pregnancy body mass index and obstetric history.The main mechanisms of preterm delivery were classified as gestational hypertension, antepartum haemorrhage, premature rupture of membranes, spontaneous preterm labour and other miscellaneous mechanisms. Main outcome measures Odds ratios for very preterm birth for low to moderate (1 -9 cigarettes/day) and heavy ( 10 cigarettes/day) maternal smoking in pregnancy, estimated according to the main mechanisms leading to preterm birth. Results Smokers were more likely to give birth to very preterm infants than non-smokers [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3 -2.2]. Heavy smoking significantly reduced the risk of very preterm birth due to gestational hypertension (aOR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-1.0), whereas both low to moderate and heavy smoking increased the risk of very preterm birth due to all other mechanisms (aOR between 1.6 and 2.8). Conclusion These data from the Epipage study show that maternal smoking during pregnancy is a risk factor for very preterm birth. The impact of maternal smoking on very preterm birth appears to be complex: it lowers the risk of very preterm birth due to gestational hypertension, but increases the risk of very preterm birth due to other mechanisms. These findings might explain why maternal smoking is more closely related to preterm birth among multiparous women than among nulliparous women.
In 1990, Gorlin et al. [Syndromes of the Head and Neck, New York: Oxford University Press, pp 641-649, 707-708] proposed to lump several syndromes together, including facioauriculovertebral syndrome, hemifacial microsomia, otomandibular dysostosis, Goldenhar syndrome, the first branchial arch anomalies and the first and second branchial arches anomalies. They proposed to use the term oculoauriculovertebral "spectrum." Because there is no agreement on minimal diagnostic criteria the phenotype overlaps many genetic and teratologic syndromes. Most cases are sporadic, but familial instances have also been observed in first-degree relatives. We report on a mother and two of her children who have the oculoauriculovertebral "spectrum." The mother had only auricular anomalies for which she had plastic and reconstructive surgery. Her first child, a girl, had a bilateral cleft lip and palate, a coloboma of upper eyelid, facial asymmetry, and posteriorly angulated ears. This child also had bilateral vesicoureteral reflux. During the second pregnancy fetal ultrasonographic examination performed at 18th week of gestation showed a cleft lip and palate. At the thirty-first week of gestation, club feet, hypoplasia of the left ear, hypoplasia of the left maxillary and mandibular arches, and left microphthalmia were evident. Examination of this fetus confirmed ultrasonographic findings and demonstrated vertebral anomalies. This familial observation confirmed variable expressivity of the oculoauriculovertebral anomaly with isolated microtia (the mother), major malformations (the fetus), and less serious anomalies (the first child) and showed that this condition may be inherited as an autosomal or X-linked dominant condition.
Despite evidence of a prothrombotic state during preeclampsia, it is unlikely that antiphospholipid antibodies (lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies) represent risk factors for preeclampsia among women with no previous preeclampsia and no histories of thrombosis or systemic autoimmune disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.