Advances in neonatology have resulted in an increase in the absolute number of survivors with chronic lung disease (CLD), though its overall incidence has not changed. Though the single most important high-risk factor for CLD is prematurity, the focus of attention has recently changed over to minimizing the impact of other two risk factors: baro/volutrauma related to mechanical ventilation, and oxygen toxicity. Permissive hypercapnia (PHC) or controlled ventilation is a strategy that minimizes baro/volutrauma by allowing relatively high levels of arterial CO(2), provided the arterial pH does not fall below a preset minimal value. The benefits of PHC are primarily mediated by the reduction of lung stretch that occurs when tidal volumes are minimized. PHC can be a deliberate choice to restrict ventilation in order to avoid overdistention, while application of high airway pressures and large tidal volumes would permit normocapnia, or relative hypocapnia (PaCO(2), < or = 25-30 mmHg), but may result in CLD and be harmful to the developing lung. The current concept that PaCO(2) levels of 45-55 mmHg in high-risk neonates are "safe" and "well tolerated" is based on limited data. Further prospective trials are needed to study the definition, safety and efficacy of PHC in ventilated preterm and term neonates. However, designing disease/gestational-postnatal age-specific clinical trials of PHC will be difficult in neonates, given the diverse pathophysiology of their diseases and the various ventilatory modes/variables currently available. The potential benefits and adverse effects of PHC are reviewed, and its relationship to current ventilatory strategies like synchronized mechanical ventilation and high-frequency ventilation in high-risk neonates is briefly discussed.
Addition of intravenous rifampin is reported to be useful in prompt clearance of persistent coagulase negative staphylococcal (CONS) bacteraemia in high‐risk neonates. Four neonates (mean birthweight 823 g, mean gestation 25 wk) with persistent CONS bacteraemia for < 7–10 d (mean 11) were treated with i.v. rifampicin (10mg/kg/12 h ± 10 d) while continuing vancomycin (15mg/kg/24 h). Their age at time of infection ranged from 2 to lid. The mean (range) vancomycin peak and trough concentrations were 29 (25–35) and 6 (4–10) μg/ml, respectively. The blood isolates were Staphylococcus epidermidis, S. hominis, and S. haemolyticus. Addition of rifampicin was associated with prompt clearance of bacteraemia within 48 h (n= 3) and 5 d (n– 1). Rifampicin‐related adverse effects such as abnormal liver function tests and thrombocytopenia did not occur. Conclusion: Addition of i.v. rifampicin to vancomycin may optimize the outcome of persistent CONS bacteraemia and the risk of bacterial resistance related to prolonged exposure to vancomycin.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.