No abstract

Background and purpose. Absolute dosimetry in 3D with polymer gels (PG) is generally complicated and usually requires a second independent measurement with conventional detectors. This is why, PG are often used only for relative dosimetry. To overcome this drawback, we combine PG with a 1D thermoluminescence (TL) detector within the same measurement. The TL detector information is then used as additional information for calibration of the gel. Materials and methods. The PAGAT dosimetry gel was used in combination with TLD600 (LiF:Mg,Ti). TL detectors were attached on the surface of the PG container placed inside a cylindrical phantom. To test the usability of this setup, two irradiation geometries were carried out: (a) homogeneous target coverage and (b) small-field irradiation. PG was evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the TL detectors with a Harshaw 5500 hot gas reader. Results. PG dosimetry alone showed deviations of up to 4% as compared to calculations. Including additionally the dose information of the TL detectors for PG calibration, this deviation was decreased to less than 1% for both irradiation geometries. This is also reflected by the very high -passing rates of  >  96% (3%/3 mm) and  >93% (2%/2 mm), respectively. Conclusion. This study presents a novel method combining 3D PG and TL dose measurements for the purpose of absolute 3D dose measurements that can also be applied in complex anthropomorphic phantoms using only a single measurement. The method was validated for two different irradiation geometries including a homogeneous large field as well as a small field irradiation with sharp dose gradients.

The increasing PDs and their trend with increasing PTV size can be explained by Compton scattering of photons from the irradiated volume toward the off-axis measuring points. The further increase of the PD in case of ToTh relative to sMLM is not easy to explain. Different presumptions are possible. The larger field length (in longitudinal direction) of the ToTh plans (consisting of the "real" field length and the overlap) relative to the sMLM plans could be one reason for the higher PD values. The softer energy spectrum of the HiArt machine with more sideward Compton scattering contributions could be another reason.