ObjectivesCombined positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) with a 68Ga-labelled PSMA-analog (68Ga-PSMA-11) is discussed as a promising diagnostic method for patients with suspicion or history of prostate cancer. One potential drawback of this method are severe photopenic (halo-) artifacts surrounding the bladder and the kidneys in the scatter-corrected PET images, which have been reported to occur frequently in clinical practice. The goal of this work was to investigate the occurrence and impact of these artifacts and, secondly, to evaluate variants of the standard scatter correction method with regard to halo-artifact suppression.MethodsExperiments using a dedicated pelvis phantom were conducted to investigate whether the halo-artifact is modality-, tracer-, and/or concentration-dependent. Furthermore, 31 patients with history of prostate cancer were selected from an ongoing 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET/MRI study. For each patient, PET raw data were reconstructed employing six different variants of PET scatter correction: absolute scatter scaling, relative scatter scaling, and relative scatter scaling combined with prompt gamma correction, each of which was combined with a maximum scatter fraction (MaxSF) of MaxSF = 75% or MaxSF = 40%. Evaluation of the reconstructed images with regard to halo-artifact suppression was performed both quantitatively using statistical analysis and qualitatively by two independent readers.ResultsThe phantom experiments did not reveal any modality-dependency (PET/MRI vs. PET/CT) or tracer-dependency (68Ga vs. 18F-FDG). Patient- and phantom-based data indicated that halo-artifacts derive from high organ-to-background activity ratios (OBR) between bladder/kidneys and surrounding soft tissue, with a positive correlation between OBR and halo size. Comparing different variants of scatter correction, reducing the maximum scatter fraction from the default value MaxSF = 75% to MaxSF = 40% was found to efficiently suppress halo-artifacts in both phantom and patient data. In 1 of 31 patients, reducing the maximum scatter fraction provided new PET-based information changing the patient’s diagnosis.ConclusionHalo-artifacts are particularly observed for 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET/MRI due to 1) the biodistribution of the PSMA-11-tracer resulting in large OBRs for bladder and kidneys and 2) inaccurate scatter correction methods currently used in clinical routine, which tend to overestimate the scatter contribution. If not compensated for, 68Ga-PSMA-11 uptake pathologies may be masked by halo-artifacts leading to false-negative diagnoses. Reducing the maximum scatter fraction was found to efficiently suppress halo-artifacts.

The presented surrogates and techniques allow the customized construction of multimodality, anthropomorphic, and deformable phantoms as exemplarily shown for a pelvic phantom, which is intended to study adaptive treatment scenarios in MR-guided radiation therapy.

For hybrid devices combining magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and a linac for radiation treatment, the isocenter accuracy as well as image distortions have to be checked. This study presents a new phantom to investigate MR-Linacs in a single measurement in terms of (i) isocentricity of the irradiation and (ii) alignment of the irradiation and imaging isocenter relative to each other using polymer dosimetry gel as well as (iii) 3-dimensional (3D) geometric MR image distortions. The evaluation of the irradiated gel was performed immediately after irradiation with the imaging component of the 0.35 T MR-Linac using a T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence. Eight plastic grid sheets within the phantom allow for measurement of geometric distortions in 3D by comparing the positions of the grid intersections (control points) within the MR-image with their nominal position obtained from a CT-scan. The distance of irradiation and imaging isocenter in 3D was found to be (0.8  ±  0.9) mm for measurements with 32 image acquisitions. The mean distortion over the whole phantom was (0.60  ±  0.28) mm and 99.8% of the evaluated control points had distortions below 1.5 mm. These geometrical uncertainties have to be considered by additional safety margins.