There are many studies of single lung ventilation (SLV), which are mostly limited to reducing lung damage by changing ventilation strategies or comparing differences in lung damage caused by different lung isolation devices. There is no study comparing the morphological changes of ventilated lungs using different strategies of artificial lung ventilation. The aim of the study was to examine pathomorphological changes in the ventilated lung during thoracic surgery using SLV. A randomized study was performed on 40 patients who underwent thoracic surgery using SLV. After signing the informed consent, the patients were divided into two groups. In the control group (40 patients) with ventilation “by volume” (VCV), in the study group – ventilation “by pressure” (PCV) with the addition of PEEP 5 mm. During surgery in the thoracic cavity with the help of SLV performed transbronchial biopsy of the parenchyma of the ventilated lung to study the pathomorphological changes after ventilation with different modes. The biopsy was performed using a bronchoscope, which was inserted through the endotracheal tube into the lung, opposite the side of the operation (after the end of SLV and “inclusion” of the collapsed lung). The morphological changes caused by the ventilator were investigated. Pathomorphological examination of the non-collapsed lung (which participated in gas exchange during SLV) was as follows: the control group found significant changes in the alveolar wall with its edema, thickening of the interstitial lung, vascular occlusion, severe inflammatory cell infiltration and damage to alveolar structures. The alveoli collapsed and disappeared. The alveolar structures of the study group were better than the control group: pulmonary interstitial and alveolar exudates, as well as inflammatory cell infiltration were significantly reduced compared to those in the control group. The results of the study suggest that the use of PCV with “moderate” PEEP can significantly improve oxygenation and reduce acute ventilatory injury of the lungs compared to VCV during SLV.
Annotation. One lung ventilation (OLV) is one of the most difficult intraoperative methods of respiratory support for anesthesiologists. OLV should provide the most comfortable surgical field, maintaining proper gas exchange and minimizing damage to both lungs. This anesthetic procedure has a significant inflammatory response, so using perioperative corticosteroid therapy to suppress inflammatory mediators is recommended as an approach to improving prognosis. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine how the preoperative administration of methylprednisolone affects the systemic proinflammatory response of cytokines during thoracic surgery. The analysis was performed for 80 patients who underwent surgeries in the thoraco-abdominal department of the Shalimov National Institute of Surgery and Transplantology. Patients were divided into 2 groups (study – 40 patients who were administered methylprednisolone 10 mg / kg intravenously during induction of anesthesia and control – 40 patients without methylprednisolone). Before surgery and in the postoperative period on days 1, 3 and 5, the surface phenotype of peripheral blood lymphocytes and the expression of IL-6 by monocytes were determined by flow cytofluorometry. The author's MedStat package was used for statistical analysis (Lyakh Yu.E., Guryanov V.G., 2004–2012). Postoperative indicators of IL-6 monocyte expression in the blood of patients administered methylprednisolone were significantly lower on the 1st and 3rd postoperative day (p<0.001). Thus, preoperative administration of methylprednisolone reduces the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and improves the condition of patients after thoracic surgery. We consider it expedient to conduct further research on the administration of methylprednisolone for several days in the postoperative period.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.