В современной практике между сторонами договора транспортной экспедиции нередко возникают споры в результате недобросовестного исполнения своих договорных обязанностей. На основании проведенного исследования отечественного законодательства, анализа судебной практики, авторами выделены особенности ответственности сторон по данному договору и определены некоторые проблемы в данных отношениях. In modern practice, disputes often arise between the parties to a transport expedition contract as a result of unfair performance of their contractual duties. Based on the study of domestic legislation, analysis of judicial practice, the authors highlighted the specifics of the parties' responsibility under this agreement and identified some problems in these relations.
This article examines the criteria for improving the readability of normative legal acts in the economic sphere of activity. Methods for dividing text into fragments for further verification are determined, formulas for readability indices adapted for the Russian language, indicators for text verification, threshold values of indices are given, according to which the complexity of the text of a regulatory document is assessed. Recommendations are proposed for correcting the texts of regulatory legal acts in order to increase their readability. The significance of the syntactic complexity of the texts of regulatory legal acts for ensuring the financial literacy of the population is revealed.
This study is determined by the theoretical and practical interest in the study of issues related to the protection of the rights of participants in transport obligations. The need for research is dictated by the direct needs of the subjects of the relevant legal relations in the actual exercise of rights, as well as in connection with the search for the most effective use of existing civil law forms of protection of violated rights of participants in transport obligations. Turning to general theoretical problems, in particular, to the concept of protection of rights, it is concluded that this is common to civil law and civil procedure. The authors state that the specifics of transport obligations determine the specifics of protecting the rights of their participants, where the main role is given to the non-jurisdictional form of protection. The authors pay special attention to the claims procedure for dispute settlement, supporting the position that this procedure is inter-industry in nature. At the same time, it is proposed to use other conciliation procedures along with the claim procedure (or after) before applying to the court, which, in turn, according to the authors, will allow building an effective system for protecting the violated rights of participants in transport obligations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.