Background and objectives: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a challenge for pregnancy. Its recent classification underlines the importance of its early phases. This study's aim was to evaluate outcomes of pregnancy according to CKD stage versus low-risk pregnancies followed in the same center.Design, setting, participants, & measurements: The prospective analysis was conducted from January 2000 to May 2009 with the start of observation at referral and end of observation 1 month after delivery. Ninety-one singleton deliveries were studied; 267 "low-risk" singleton pregnancies served as controls. Because of the lack of hard end points (death, start of dialysis), surrogate end points were analyzed (cesarean section, prematurity, neonatal intensive care).Results: CKD outcome was worse than physiologic pregnancies: preterm delivery (44% versus 5%); cesarean section (44% versus 25%); and need for neonatal intensive care (26% versus 1%). The differences were highly significant in stage 1 CKD (61 cases) versus controls (CKD stage 1: cesarean sections ‫؍‬ 57%, preterm delivery ‫؍‬ 33%, intensive care ‫؍‬ 18%). In CKD, proteinuria and hypertension were correlated with outcomes [proteinuria dichotomized at 1 g/24 h at referral: need for intensive care, relative risk (RR) ‫؍‬ 4. Conclusions: CKD is a challenge for pregnancy from early stages. Strict follow-up is needed for CKD patients, even when there is normal renal function.

Conclusions: Evidence on pregnancy in dialysis is heterogeneous; however, the growing number of reports worldwide and the improving results suggest that we should reconsider our counseling policy, which only rarely includes pregnancy in dialysis patients.

The quality of the validation of most disease specific PROMs for IC is alarming, hampering all conclusion based on these PROMs. Considering the results, the PAD quality of life questionnaire (PADQOL), Intermittent claudication questionnaire (ICQ) and the Vascular quality of life questionnaire (VascuQol) might be appropriate PROMs for health related quality of life, while the Walking impairment questionnaire (WIQ) and Estimate ambulation capacity by history questionnaire (EACH-Q) appear suitable PROMs for functional status. However, all PROMs require further validation studies to fill the gaps in their measurement properties. The shortcomings highlighted in this review should be taken into account when interpreting PROM results.

There is a strong need to unify definitions and stratifications to allow quantitative evidence-based counseling for pregnant patients with CKD.

Endovascular aneurysm repair is not inferior to open repair in patients with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. This supports the use of EVAR in suitable patients and OR as a reasonable alternative.

Based on low- to moderate-quality evidence, PTA with optional bailout stenting using BS should remain the preferred strategy in treating CLI patients with BTK arterial lesions. Before other strategies can be implemented, larger and high-quality RCTs assessing clinically relevant outcomes are needed.

PurposeThe minimally important difference (MID) represents the smallest change in score on patient-reported outcome measures that is relevant to patients. The aim of this study was to introduce the MID for the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (VascuQol) and the walking impairment questionnaire (WIQ) for patients with intermittent claudication (IC).MethodsIn this multicenter study, we recruited 294 patients with IC between July and October 2012. Patients completed the VascuQol, with scores ranging from 1 to 7 (worst to best), and the WIQ, with scores ranging from 0 to 1 (worst to best) at first visit and after 4 months follow-up. In addition, patients answered an anchor-question rating their health status compared to baseline, as being improved, unchanged, or deteriorated. The MID for improvement and deterioration was calculated by an anchor-based approach, and determined with the upper and lower limits of the 95 % confidence interval of the mean change of the group who had not changed according to the anchor-question.ResultsFor the MID analyses of the VascuQol and WIQ, 163 and 134 patients were included, respectively. The MID values for the VascuQol (mean baseline score 4.25) were 0.87 for improvement and 0.23 for deterioration. For the WIQ (mean baseline score 0.39), we found MID values of 0.11 and −0.03 for improvement and deterioration, respectively.ConclusionIn this study, we calculated the MID for the VascuQol and the WIQ. Applying these MID facilitates better interpretation of treatment outcomes and can help to set treatment goals for individual care.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00270-015-1060-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

In general, performing PTA with optional bailout stenting for ATK lesions is the preferred strategy in patients with IC. For CLI, more studies are needed for recommending an optimal treatment strategy.