GH-releasing peptide (His-DTrp-Ala-Trp-DPhe-Lys-NH2 or GHRP) releases GH by a unique and complementary dual site of action on the hypothalamus and pituitary. These effects are mediated via non-GH-releasing hormone (non-GHRH) and nonopiate receptors in rats. Select types of opiates are known to release GH by a hypothalamic site of action, and thus, the dermorphin heptapeptide and benzomorphan opiate agonist 2549 used in this study presumably act on the hypothalamus to release GH. Neither dermorphin nor 2549 released GH or augmented the GH responses of GHRP or GHRH in vitro by a direct pituitary action, while GHRH antiserum inhibited the GH response of both dermorphin and 2549 in vivo. Evidence indicates that these opiates and GHRP administered together synergistically release GH, demonstrating the independent action(s) of GHRP and the opiates. Present data indicate that one of the major differences in the actions of dermorphin, 2549, and GHRP is the inhibition of somatostatin (SRIF) release by the opiates but not by GHRP. Although the actions of dermorphin, 2549, and GHRP on GH release are GHRH dependent, release of endogenous GHRH does not explain how GH is released synergistically by the combination of these peptides. It is proposed that dermorphin/2549 synergistically release GH with GHRP or GHRH because these opiates inhibit SRIF release. Since the GHRP plus GHRH synergistic GH release was not explained by inhibition of SRIF or stimulation of GHRH, an alternative mechanism is proposed to explain how GHRP synergistically release GH in combination with GHRH. The complementary, rather dramatic synergistic interaction of GHRP, GHRH, and dermorphin or GHRP, GHRH, and 2549 in releasing GH again strongly supports the independent actions of these compounds.
Background BRCA2-associated breast and ovarian cancers are sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy. It is unknown whether BRCA2-associated prostate cancer responds favorably to such treatment. Methods Retrospective analysis of a single-institution cohort of men with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer was performed to determine the association between carrier status of pathogenic BRCA2 germline variants and prostate-specific antigen response to carboplatin-based chemotherapy. From 2001-2015, 8,081 adult men with prostate cancer seen in consultation and/or treated at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute provided blood samples and consented to analysis of biological material and clinical records. A subgroup of 141 received at least two doses of carboplatin and docetaxel for castration-resistant disease (94% were also taxane refractory). These subjects were categorized according to absence or presence of pathogenic germline mutations in BRCA2, based on DNA sequencing from whole blood. Primary outcome was response rate to carboplatin/docetaxel chemotherapy as defined by decline in prostate-specific antigen exceeding 50% within 12 weeks of initiating this regimen. Association between BRCA2 mutation status and response to carboplatin-based chemotherapy was tested, using Fisher’s exact test, with a two-sided p-value of <0.05 as threshold for significance. Results Pathogenic germline BRCA2 variants were observed in 8/141 (5.7%; 95% CI=2.5%-10.9%) participants. Six of eight (75%) BRCA2 carriers experienced prostate-specific antigen decline >50% within 12 weeks, compared to 23 of 133 (17%) non-carriers (absolute difference 58%; 95% CI=27%-88%; P<0.001). Prostate cancer cell lines functionally corroborate these clinical findings. Conclusions BRCA2-associated castration-resistant prostate cancer is associated with higher likelihood of response to carboplatin-based chemotherapy than non-BRCA2 associated prostate cancer.
Context We have recently witnessed a rapid increase in the number of effective systemic agents for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), including novel hormonal therapies (abiraterone acetate and MDV3100), immunotherapies (sipu-leucel-T), chemotherapies (cabazitaxel), and bone microenvironment targeting agents (denosumab, radium 223). Given the increasing complexity of treatment decisions for this disease, major research and clinical priorities are (1) finding biomarkers that enable an understanding of the natural history and complex biology of this heterogeneous malignancy, (2) defining predictive biomarkers that identify men most likely to benefit from a given therapy, and (3) identifying biomarkers of early response or progression to optimize outcomes. Objective In this review, we discuss existing and potential biomarkers in CRPC and how they may currently inform prognosis, aid in treatment selection (predictive value), and relate to survival outcomes (surrogacy). Evidence acquisition PubMed-based literature searches and abstracts through September 2011 provided the basis for this literature review as well as expert opinion. Evidence synthesis We address blood and urine-based biomarkers such as prostate-specific antigen, lactate dehydrogenase, total and bone alkaline phosphatase and other bone turnover markers, hemoglobin, and circulating tumor cells in the context of prognosis, prediction, and patient selection for therapy. Given the inherent problems associated with defining progression-free survival in CRPC, the importance of biomarker development and the needed steps are highlighted. We place the discussion of bio-markers within the context of the design/intent of a trial and mechanism of action of a given systemic therapy. We discuss novel biomarker development and the pathway for surrogate or predictive biomarkers to become credentialed as useful tests that inform therapeutic decisions. Conclusions A greater understanding of biomarkers in CRPC permits a more personalized approach to care that maximizes benefit and minimizes harm and can inform clinical trials tailored to men most likely to derive benefit.
The evidence suggests that cabozantinib has clinically meaningful activity in CRPC. Cabozantinib resulted in improvements in bone scans, pain, analgesic use, measurable soft tissue disease, circulating tumor cells, and bone biomarkers. Taken together, these phase II observations warrant further development of cabozantinib in prostate cancer.
BackgroundCabazitaxel significantly improves overall survival (OS) versus mitoxantrone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after docetaxel failure. We examined patient survival at 2 years and tumour-related pain with cabazitaxel versus mitoxantrone.MethodsUpdated TROPIC data (cut-off 10 March 2010) were used to compare 2-year survival between treatment groups and assess patient demographics and disease characteristics. Factors prognostic for survival ≥2 years were assessed. Pain and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status were evaluated in the overall patient population.ResultsMedian follow-up was 25.5 months. After 2 years, more patients remained alive following cabazitaxel than mitoxantrone [odds ratio 2.11; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.33–3.33]. Treatment with cabazitaxel was prognostic for survival ≥2 years. Demographics/baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment arms irrespective of survival. Pain at baseline and pain response were comparable between treatment groups. Average daily pain performance index was lower for cabazitaxel versus mitoxantrone (all cycles; 95% CI –0.27 to –0.01; P = 0.035) and analgesic scores were similar. Grade ≥3 peripheral neuropathies were uncommon and comparable between treatment groups.ConclusionsCabazitaxel prolongs OS at 2 years versus mitoxantrone and has low rates of peripheral neuropathy. Palliation benefits of cabazitaxel were comparable to those of mitoxantrone.The study was registered with (NCT00417079).
BACKGROUND. Antiandrogen withdrawal is a potential therapeutic maneuver for patients with progressive prostate cancer. This study was designed to examine antiandrogen withdrawal effects within the context of a large multi‐institutional prospective trial. METHODS. Eligibility criteria included progressive prostate adenocarcinoma despite combined androgen blockade. Eligible patients received prior initial treatment with an antiandrogen plus orchiectomy or luteinizing hormone‐releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist. Patients were stratified according to type of antiandrogen, type of progression (prostate‐specific antigen [PSA] or radiographic), presence or absence of metastatic disease, and prior LHRH agonist versus surgical castration. RESULTS. A total of 210 eligible and evaluable patients had a median follow‐up of 5.0 years; 64% of patients previously received flutamide, 32% bicalutamide, and 3% nilutamide. Of the 210 patients, 21% of patients had confirmed PSA decreases of ≥50% (95% CI, 16% to 27%). No radiographic responses were recorded. Median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 3 months (95% CI, 2 months to 4 months); however, 19% had 12‐month or greater progression‐free intervals. Median overall survival (OS) after antiandrogen withdrawal was 22 months (20 and 40 months for those with and without radiographic evidence of metastatic disease, respectively). Multivariate analyses indicated that longer duration of antiandrogen use, lower PSA at baseline, and PSA‐only progression at study entry were associated with both longer PFS and OS. Longer antiandrogen use was the only significant predictor of PSA response. CONCLUSIONS. These data indicate a relatively modest rate of PSA response in patients who were undergoing antiandrogen withdrawal; however, PFS can be relatively prolonged (≥1 year) in approximately 19% of patients. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.