Phacovitrectomy for macular hole surgery without postoperative face down posture is a reasonable approach, as long as the eye has more than 70% gas fill (beyond the inferior retinal vascular arcade) on the first postoperative day. This study showed no statistically significant difference between patients who postured and those who did not posture. The combination of phacoemulsification, pars plana vitrectomy, internal limiting membrane, and gas tamponade in macular hole surgery reduces the difficulty of posturing in elderly patients. This technique saves the patient from exposure to a second intraocular intervention to remove a cataract which will commonly develop after vitrectomy and gas tamponade alone.

Manual astigmatic keratotomy is a viable technique with relatively good safety and efficacy outcomes. Based on the results we propose that increasing the arc length to a minimum of 60° for astigmatism of 6-9D, and to 75° for astigmatism >9D, is likely to have a greater beneficial effect.

No abstract

Purpose Most cataract surgery is now performed under local anaesthesia on a daycase basis. As patients are fully conscious during the procedure, it is important that they remain still. There are a variety of reasons why patients may need to move, and it is important that the surgeon is made aware that this may happen. Some centres offer a nurse's hand as a means of perioperative patient communication. We sought to study the safety and efficacy of using an electronic patient-controlled alert device. Method We compared hand-holding with the use of a patient alert device, and with both communication methods at the same time, on 150 subjects undergoing cataract surgery under local anaesthesia. Assessment of pre-and postoperative state anxiety was undertaken and patients' satisfaction with the communication strategies was assessed. Results There was a significant difference between pre-and postoperative state anxiety for each group (Po0.001) but no significant differences in pre-, peri-, or postoperative state anxiety between groups. There were no significant differences in confidence, pain, understanding, satisfaction, memory, and reassurance between the three groups. A total of 46% of all patients reported experiencing one or more of the potential problems enquired about, during the operation. Significant correlations were also identified between some of the psychological variables investigated. Conclusions An electronic patient alert device is as effective a means of perioperative patient communication as holding a nurse's hand, during cataract surgery under local anaesthesia. It is safe, reassuring and it allows patients to communicate directly with the surgeon.

Sir, Reply to P Cackett et al and S Ahmed et alProviding patients with tactile feedback from the PAS, to confirm its operation, is perfectly reasonable. Recognition and acknowledgement of the PAS by the operating surgeon or other theatre staff and communicating with the patient, to demonstrate such and ascertain their concerns, is ultimately the desired outcome in this context.