No abstract

Objective To determine the frequency and causes of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) technique failure and its effect on patient outcome. Design Retrospective study of CAPD technique and patient outcome. Setting Teaching hospital renal unit. Patients All 221 patients commencing CAPD over a 14-year period. Outcome measures: Outcomes assessed included patient survival and technique survival (with change to hemodialysis being considered as technique failure). Results CAPD failure occurred in 46 patients, with a CAPD technique survival of 93%,73%, and 63% at 1,3, an d 5 years after start of treatment. Peritonitis was the major cause of technique failure. CAPD system had no effect on technique survival, despite the lower peritonitis rate in patients using Y-connection systems. Overall patient survival was 91 %, 72%, and 53% at 1, 3, and 5 years after start of treatment, with increasing age and diabetes being associated with a worse outcome. There was a high early mortality after CAPD failure, with an actuarial survival of only 61% 1 year later. Conclusion Failure of CAPD is an important problem, with peritonitis being the major cause, either directly, or indirectly by the later effects of damage to the peritoneal membrane with loss of dialysis adequacy. The high mortality in the period following CAPD failure warrants careful monitoring of patients during this phase, along with efforts to optimize correctable factors such as nutrition, adequacy of the new form of dialysis, and treatment of residual sepsis.

Use of icodextrin for the daytime dwell in APD results in improved fluid balance and blood pressure control compared with 2.27% glucose. MFBIA detected clinically important changes in fluid content in these patients.

Our data suggests that leptin is markedly increased in some patients with chronic renal failure. The association of increased leptin with low protein intake and loss of lean tissue is consistent with leptin contributing to malnutrition but a definitive role cannot be substantiated by this study.

Rhabdomyolysis caused 28 out of 903 (3.1%) of cases of severe acute renal failure (ARF) treated at Leeds General Infirmary over a 14-year period (1980-1993). The commonest cause of rhabdomyolysis was muscle compression, usually due to drug- or alcohol-induced coma. Other causes included fits, infection, acute limb ischemia, trauma, and heat stroke. Prognosis was relatively good, with a 78.6% survival rate and recovery of renal function to normal in all survivors who were followed up. The creatinine/urea ratio was higher in ARF due to rhabdomyolysis than in an unselected group of patients with other causes of ARF but not when the comparison was with sex- and age-matched controls with ARF. This suggests that this previously described feature of rhabdomyolysis simply reflects the increased muscle mass of a younger group of patients, rather than a specific effect of muscle damage. Clinical features of muscle damage were often absent and so the possibility of rhabdomyolysis should be considered in appropriate settings if the diagnosis is to be made early enough to administer treatment that may prevent ARF and the consequences of the compartment syndrome.