This work investigates the electrochemical behaviour of an AISI 316L stainless steel produced by selective laser melting (SLM) and compares its behaviour with that of wrought stainless steel with similar chemical composition. The SLM stainless steel specimens are tested in the as‐produced condition without stress relief or recrystallization heat treatments. The electrochemical tests are carried out in two electrolytes: 3.5 wt% NaCl solution with neutral pH and with pH of 1.8. At the macroscale, the microstructure of the SLM specimens is determined by the laser scanning pattern and displays an overlapping network of melt pools. At the microscale, the SLM specimens exhibit a cellular/columnar dendritic structure with submicrometric cell size. Electrochemical measurements highlight a more extended passive range for SLM stainless steel in both neutral and acid electrolytes indicating higher protective properties of the oxide film on SLM specimens. In contrast to the wrought material, the refined microstructure of the SLM specimens promotes a very shallow morphology of attack without deep penetration in the bulk.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Stainless steels are used today in a wide range of applications as a result of their combination of high corrosion resistance and good mechanical properties. In some applications, for example, temporary contact biomedical devices or solar water heaters, corrosion resistance may need further improvement, and surface coatings may be applied for enhanced protection. In this study, AISI 316 stainless steel samples with two different standard industrial finishes were coated using atomic layer deposition (ALD) of Al 2 O 3 /TiO 2 layers. The morphology, composition and corrosion protection was then investigated using different techniques. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used to obtain a morphological characterization of coatings and substrates. Glow discharge optical emission spectrometry (GDOES) was used to obtain an in-depth profile of composition. Polarization curves in a 0.2 M NaCl solution were used to evaluate the corrosion protection given by the coatings. The deposited ALD layers were found to be almost flawless. The measured RMS roughness values were compared before and after the ALD, and were around 50 and 370 nm for the two samples. GDOES profiles were strongly influenced by the roughness of the substrate. The corrosion protection obtained on AISI 316 stainless steel by the application of nanometric coatings proved to be very effective in reducing the passive region current density from 10 À7 to less than 10 À9 A/cm 2 and increasing the passive region potential interval from 0.8 to 1.3 V before breakdown.

No abstract