ContextThe transition of patients with Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) to adult life for medical care is challenging because of multiple comorbidities, including hormone deficiencies, obesity and cognitive and behavioral disabilities.ObjectiveTo assess endocrine management, and metabolic and anthropometric parameters of PWS adults who received (n = 31) or not (n = 64) transitional care, defined as specialized pediatric care followed by a structured care pathway to a multidisciplinary adult team.Patients and study designHormonal and metabolic parameters were retrospectively recorded in 95 adults with PWS (mean ± s.d. age 24.7 ± 8.2 years, BMI: 39.8 ± 12.1 kg/m²) referred to our Reference Center and compared according to transition.ResultsAmong the entire cohort, 35.8% received growth hormone (GH) during childhood and 16.8% had a GH stimulation test after completion of growth. In adulthood, 14.7% were treated with GH, 56.8% received sex-hormone therapy, whereas 91.1% were hypogonadic and 37.9% had undergone valid screening of the corticotropic axis. The main reason for suboptimal endocrine management was marked behavioral disorders. Patients receiving transitional care were more likely to have had a GH stimulation test and hormonal substitutions in childhood. They also had a lower BMI, percentage of fat mass, improved metabolic parameters and fewer antidepressant treatments. Transitional care remained significantly associated with these parameters in multivariate analysis when adjusted on GH treatment.ConclusionA coordinated care pathway with specialized pediatric care and transition to a multidisciplinary adult team accustomed to managing complex disability including psychiatric troubles are associated with a better health status in adults with PWS.
<b><i>Objective:</i></b> Estimating glucose variability (GV) through within-day coefficient of variation (%CV<sub>w</sub>) is recommended for patients with type-1 Diabetes (T1D). High-GV (hGV) is defined as %CV<sub>w</sub>>36%. However, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices provide exclusively total-CV (%CV<sub>T</sub>). We aimed to assess consequences of this disparity. <p><b><i>Research Design and Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively calculated both %CV<sub>T</sub> and %CV<sub>W </sub>of consecutive T1D patients from their CGM raw data during 14 days. Patients with hGV with %CV<sub>T</sub>>36% and %CV<sub>w</sub>≤36% were called the “inconsistent-GV group”.</p> <p><b><i>Results:</i></b> 104 patients were included. Mean %CV<sub>T</sub> and %CV<sub>w</sub> were 42.4+/-8% and 37.0+/-7.4% respectively (p<0.0001). Using %CV<sub>T</sub>, 81 patients (73.6%) were classified as hGV whereas 59 (53.6%) using %CV<sub>W </sub>(p<0.0001) corresponding to 22 patients (21%) in the “<i>inconsistent-GV</i> population”.</p> <p><b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Evaluation of GV through %CV in patients with T1D is highly dependent on the calculation method and then must be standardized.</p>
OBJECTIVE Estimating glycemic variability (GV) through within-day coefficient of variation (%CVw) is recommended for patients with type 1 Diabetes (T1D). High GV (hGV) is defined as %CVw > 36%. However, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices provide exclusively total CV (%CVT). We aimed to assess consequences of this disparity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We retrospectively calculated both %CVT and %CVw of consecutive T1D patients from their CGM raw data during 14 days. Patients with hGV with %CVT >36% and %CVw ≤36% were called the “inconsistent GV group”. RESULTS A total of 104 patients were included. Mean ± SD %CVT and %CVw were 42.4 ± 8% and 37.0 ± 7.4% respectively (P < 0.0001). Using %CVT, 81 patients (73.6%) were classified as having hGV, whereas 59 (53.6%) using %CVw (P < 0.0001) corresponding to 22 patients (21%) in the inconsistent GV population. CONCLUSIONS Evaluation of GV through %CV in patients with T1D is highly dependent on the calculation method and then must be standardized.
Cryopreserved arterial allografts (CAA) have been described as a valuable alternative reconstruction material in vascular infections, offering resistance to infection, reduced operation time, and better compatibility. Up to an 18% early rupture and occlusion rate has been reported in aortic procedures. 1 However, peripheral graft infections (PGI) have their own specificities. Controversy remains over the optimal conduit when autologous superficial veins are not available, as seen in the recent ESVS guidelines which list CAA among eligible materials without prioritisation. 2 The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of CAA use in PGI with particular focus on the early graft specific complications (GSC, i.e. rupture and thrombosis). Patients who underwent CAA implantation for a PGI from February 2008 to December 2018 were identified. Diagnosis of PGI was based on clinical, biological, ultrasound, and computed tomography findings. Indications for graft removal were group 3e5 infections according to the Samson modification of the Szilagyi system (deep wound infections with skin/surrounding tissues necrosis, graft exposure, or rupture) and systemic sepsis. Revascularisation was performed in patients with ischaemia at presentation, or in whom the initial graft was implanted for a Rutherford 3e6 chronic limb ischaemia or intended to bypass an iliac vessel. Autologous great saphenous vein (GSV) was always assessed and CAA considered only when the GSV was insufficient. External iliac and superficial femoral CAA were harvested from brain deceased donors, immersed in antibiotics, and cryopreserved either in vapour phase of liquid nitrogen (À150 C) after controlled rate freezing, or at À80 C. No ABO matching was performed at the study centre. Broad spectrum intravenous antibiotics were administered peri-operatively, followed by adjusted oral therapy for four to six weeks. No immunosuppressive therapy was given post-operatively. The recorded variables were age, sex, comorbidities, ASA score, Rutherford stage at initial operation, infection stage, cryopreservation method (À80 C vs. À150 C), microbiology and operative elements (duration, ex situ/in situ, urgent/elective). The primary endpoint was GSC (rupture or thrombosis). The secondary endpoints were all cause mortality, limb amputation, and re-infection. Descriptive and survival analyses were performed. The association of each variable with the outcome was estimated with a Cox proportional hazards model. Thirty-eight patients (men, 89%; mean age 69.5 AE 10.3 years) were included. The median time to PGI diagnosis was 36.5 (13e3650) days. Reconstruction was performed urgently in 11 (29%) patients. In six (15%) patients, a venous
<b><i>Objective:</i></b> Estimating glucose variability (GV) through within-day coefficient of variation (%CV<sub>w</sub>) is recommended for patients with type-1 Diabetes (T1D). High-GV (hGV) is defined as %CV<sub>w</sub>>36%. However, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices provide exclusively total-CV (%CV<sub>T</sub>). We aimed to assess consequences of this disparity. <p><b><i>Research Design and Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively calculated both %CV<sub>T</sub> and %CV<sub>W </sub>of consecutive T1D patients from their CGM raw data during 14 days. Patients with hGV with %CV<sub>T</sub>>36% and %CV<sub>w</sub>≤36% were called the “inconsistent-GV group”.</p> <p><b><i>Results:</i></b> 104 patients were included. Mean %CV<sub>T</sub> and %CV<sub>w</sub> were 42.4+/-8% and 37.0+/-7.4% respectively (p<0.0001). Using %CV<sub>T</sub>, 81 patients (73.6%) were classified as hGV whereas 59 (53.6%) using %CV<sub>W </sub>(p<0.0001) corresponding to 22 patients (21%) in the “<i>inconsistent-GV</i> population”.</p> <p><b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Evaluation of GV through %CV in patients with T1D is highly dependent on the calculation method and then must be standardized.</p>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.