The effectiveness of the developed adsorbents used for DNA isolation and purification was confirmed in comparison with the standard methods. Thus, a facile (alternative in relation to irradiation postpolymerization or standard oxidative polymerization techniques) manufacturing method of the materials for nucleic acids sample preparation was developed.
BACKGROUND: Combination of different cancer markers is often used for predicting tumor growth, for the response to cancer therapy, and for increase in the positive diagnosis ratio in the malignant tumors. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy of CA 15-3 and CA-62 cancer markers combination for early stages of breast cancer (BC) detection. METHODS: This retrospective blind study was performed on 2 clinically validated Sets that included serum measurements of CA 15-3 ELISA and CLIA-CA-62 assays in 488 serum samples with TNM classification. A study included 300 BC patients (254 at Stages I and II, 20 with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and 26 Stages III and IV patients), 47 patients with breast benign diseases, and 141 healthy controls. RESULTS: Sensitivity for DCIS & Stage I breast cancer detection was 75% at 100% Specificity (AUC = 0.895) using a following combination of two antigens: 10 < CA15-3 < 46 U/ml and CA-62 ⩾ 6300 U/ml, which allows eliminating false positive results. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained in a blind study demonstrate that a combination of CA15-3 with CA-62 yields 75% Sensitivity at 100% Specificity for DCIS and Stage I breast cancer detection, which has a potential to be integrated into existing screening programs.
Purpose of the study. Evaluation of the diagnostic characteristics of the CA‑62 marker for epithelial carcinomas for detecting early‑stage prostate cancer in a double‑blind clinical study. This study is also focused on the possibility of using the CA‑62 antigen as an auxiliary tool for decision‑making in prostate cancer diagnosis.Patients and methods. A blinded clinical study was conducted on 325 clinically verified blood serum samples. This includes 144 prostate cancer samples, 79 generally healthy volunteers‑men and 102 samples from patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Quantitative determination of the total and free prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels, as well as the CA‑62 marker of serum samples was performed using the electrochemiluminescent immunoassay ECLIA Elecsys Total and Free PSA (COBAS, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Germany, EU) and the chemiluminescent immunoassay CLIA‑CA‑62 (JVS Diagnostics LLC, Moscow, RF).Results. A comparison of the CA‑62 level with the results for total and free PSA, as well as other diagnostic methods (PCA3, PHI) for the analysis of the BPH and prostate cancer groups was performed. The results show that the CA‑62 marker has the highest PPV (94.4 %) and NPV (93.1 %). This may increase the reliability of the decision related to the presence of PC and be used by doctors as an argument as an argument for a prostate biopsy referral. It has been demonstrated that using the novel cancer marker CA‑62 makes it possible to detect up to 90 % of the early‑stage prostate cancer with 97.2 % specificity (AUC = 0.969).Conclusion. Using the CA‑62 marker as an auxiliary diagnostic method within the PSA “grey zone” (from 2.5 to 10 ng/ml) made it possible to significantly increase the accuracy of detecting the PC early stages at biopsy up to 93.1 %. It will help the doctors to effectively differentiate between prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.