This study examined the prevalence of endodontic treatment in a group of 184 Dutch adults, and determined the periapical status of all teeth using panoramic radiographs. The results indicate that in this group, 2.3% of the teeth were root-filled, and that 5.2% of all non-endodontically treated teeth showed signs of periapical pathology. Around the apices of 39.2% of the endodontically treated teeth in this survey, radiographic signs of periapical pathology were observed. Using the level of the root canal filling as a criterion for evaluating the quality of the root canal treatment, 50.6% of the endodontic treatments were qualified as inadequate. There was a significant correlation between the presence of periapical pathology and underfilling of the root canal(s). 44.6% of the patient sample had at least one tooth with radiographic signs of periapical pathology, indicating a substantial future need for endodontic treatment.

This article reviews and assesses six dental anxiety and fear questionnaires. The construct aimed at by the questionnaires, the data collected, their reliability, validity and normative scores are considered. Some attention is given to the correlations between the questionnaires, their ambiguity, the presence of manuals, and whether the questionnaires tap the three segments distinguishable on theoretical ground in dental anxiety/fear. All questionnaires are open to criticism. In the final assessment Kleinknecht's Dental Fear Survey is preferred to Corah's Dental Anxiety Scale. The latter, however, appears useful in getting a quick impression of anxiety and in evaluative studies. Three recently developed questionnaires, Stouthard's Dental Anxiety Inventory, Weiner's Fear Questionnaire and Morin's Adolescents' Fear of Dental Treatment Cognitive Inventory are considered promising, but for the last two instruments more data, in particular with regard to their validity, are needed. It is concluded that in dental anxiety research more than one questionnaire should be used and that it may be worthwhile to include other, non-anxiety questionnaires as well.

The results of some short-term experiments suggest that direct capping of a vital pulp with the modern resin-based composite systems may be as effective as capping with calcium hydroxide. Total cavity etching with 10% phosphoric acid seems to be safe for the exposed pulp, but unless annulled by calcium hydroxide 35% phosphoric acid may be disastrous. For hemostasis and cleaning of the pulp wound both sodium hypochlorite and saline seem suitable, whereas the effectiveness of a 2% chlorhexidine solution is questionable. Although hard-setting calcium hydroxide cements may induce the formation of dentin bridges, they appear not to provide an effective long-term seal against bacterial factors. Within a few years, the majority of mechanically exposed and capped pulps show infection and necrosis due to microleakage of such capping materials and tunnel defects in the dentin bridges. It is unknown whether newer types of resin containing calcium-hydroxide-products will act as a permanent barrier. The cytotoxicity of the resin-based composites and the temperature rise during polymerisation may not be of concern, but microleakage, sensitisation and allergic reactions may pose problems. Based on available data, pulp capping with resin-based composites may be said to be promising, but more and long-term research is mandatory before the method can be recommended.

A random sample of 400 Dutch general practitioners was asked to complete a questionnaire dealing with the prevalence, conditions and therapies of cervical hypersensitivity of their patients. According to the 259 responding dentists an average of 10% of their patients suffered from moderate cervical pain. The estimated mode for severe pain was 1%. More than two thirds of the dentists reported inadequate brushing of the teeth to cause the hypersensitivity, about one half acknowledged periodontal causes, well over one quarter mentioned the involvement of dietary acids, and about one sixth implicated psychosomatic factors. Other causal factors were mentioned less often. Of the therapies available, the home-care methods appeared to be promoted most often, i.e. brushing with therapeutic toothpastes (77%), improvement of oral hygiene (51%) and local self-application (with finger) of a therapeutic toothpaste or fluoride preparations before the night (41%). Well over 50% reported to apply occasionally bondings/varnishes and 28% said to make sometimes cervical fillings. Other therapeutic possibilities were not, or very seldom, used.

No abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the feasibility of saliva collection from highly anxious dental patients and to evaluate whether salivary cortisol concentrations could discriminate between 13 highly anxious dental patients and 13 non-anxious subjects. Whole mixed saliva was sampled by suction after stimulation with citric acid crystals. Salivary free cortisol levels were measured in duplicate by radioimmunoassay. Collection of saliva took 2-5 min and was not experienced as unpleasant. Salivary free cortisol concentrations were significantly elevated if the patients manifested anxiety according to the scores on the Dental Anxiety Scale. The measurement of salivary cortisol may be a convenient method for the assessment of dental anxiety.

No abstract

The aim of many endodontic studies is to compare two or more treatment methods, techniques or materials, for example, to detect differences in mean leakage scores. As it is not feasible to study large populations, samples are taken. The important question then arises as to how large the sample sizes have to be in order to establish the 'true' (= populations') mean scores. First, it must be determined which magnitude of the difference (= v) between the mean scores is of endodontic interest. Based upon v and a few related statistical parameters, one may calculate how large the samples must be in order that a statistical test yields a significant result for a difference that is of endodontic importance. In other words, the 'power' of a test, depending on the sample size among other factors, must be large enough to detect the 'true' a priori determined difference between the populations. The use of small sample sizes may imply that a rather large difference between two mean leakage scores is not found to be significant, thereby leading to incorrect conclusions. This article describes the power and the statistical related factors that determine the adequate size of samples. Examples of power calculation are presented. Next, the power of publicized endodontic leakage studies was evaluated. Almost two-thirds of the sample sizes were 10 or less, and about 90% were 20 or less. Less than one-half of the tests had an adequate power (conventionally > or = 0.80). It is necessary to be cautious when extrapolating the results of such studies, because of the limited power of the statistical tests. The power may be increased by using larger sample sizes or, alternatively, by enlarging the 'effect size', by either taking an interest in a larger difference between the mean scores, or by minimizing the variability of the data.