Clinical practice guidelines have been developed to improve the process and outcomes of health care and to optimize resource utilization. By addressing such issues as prevention, diagnosis, and treatment, they can aid in health care decision making at many levels. Several other decision aids are cast in the guideline lexicon, regardless of their focus, formulation, or format; this can foster misunderstanding of the term "guideline." Whether created or adapted locally or nationally, most guidelines are an amalgam of clinical experience, expert opinion, and research evidence. Approaches to practice guideline development vary widely. Given the resources required to identify all relevant primary studies, many guidelines rely on systematic reviews that were either previously published or created de novo by guideline developers. Systematic reviews can aid in guideline development because they involve searching for, selecting, critically appraising, and summarizing the results of primary research. The more rigorous the review methods used and the higher the quality of the primary research that is synthesized, the more evidence-based the practice guideline is likely to be. Summaries of relevant research incorporated into guideline documents can help to keep practitioners up to date with the literature. Systematic reviews have also been published on the dissemination and implementation strategies most likely to change clinician behavior and improve patient outcomes. These can be useful in more effectively translating research evidence into practice.
Twenty-five patients with septic shock underwent simultaneous radionuclide ventriculography and right heart catheterization to clarify the role of the right ventricle in this syndrome. A depressed right ventricular ejection fraction (less than 38%) was present in 13 patients and was found in patients with elevated cardiac output (4 of 6 patients) and with normal or low cardiac output (9 of 19 patients). Right ventricular dysfunction was seen with or without acute respiratory failure. In eight patients, a depressed right ventricular ejection fraction was seen in combination with an abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction (less than 48%), but in five patients, right ventricular ejection fraction impairment occurred with normal left ventricular ejection fraction. There was no significant correlation between abnormal right ventricular afterload and depressed right ventricular ejection fraction. No clinical or hemodynamic finding could be used to identify patients with diminished right ventricular ejection fraction. On follow-up study in 17 surviving patients, right ventricular ejection fraction improved in 6 and was unchanged in 11. Improvement in right ventricular ejection fraction occurred more frequently in patients without pulmonary hypertension or respiratory distress. The results suggest that right ventricular dysfunction in septic shock may be more common than previously suspected. It may be caused by abnormalities in right ventricular afterload in some patients and depressed myocardial contractility in others. The findings are of therapeutic importance since interventions that diminish right ventricular afterload and increase right ventricular contractility would be appropriate in patients with septic shock and right ventricular dysfunction.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.