No abstract

BackgroundCentral venous pressure (CVP) and right atrial pressure (RAP) are important parameters in the complete hemodynamic assessment of a patient. Sonographic measurement of the inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter is a non-invasive method of estimating these parameters, but there are limited data summarizing its diagnostic accuracy across multiple studies. We performed a comprehensive review of the existing literature to examine the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of sonographic measurement of IVC diameter as a method for assessing CVP and RAP.MethodsWe performed a systematic search using PubMed of clinical studies comparing sonographic evaluation of IVC diameter and collapsibility against gold standard measurements of CVP and RAP. We included clinical studies that were performed in adults, used current imaging techniques, and were published in English.ResultsTwenty one clinical studies were identified that compared sonographic assessment of IVC diameter with CVP and RAP and met all inclusion criteria. Despite substantial heterogeneity in measurement techniques and patient populations, most studies demonstrated moderate strength correlations between measurements of IVC diameter and collapsibility and CVP or RAP, but more favorable diagnostic accuracy using pre-specified cut points. Findings were inconsistent among mechanically ventilated patients, except in the absence of positive end-expiratory pressure.ConclusionSonographic measurement of IVC diameter and collapsibility is a valid method of estimating CVP and RAP. Given the ease, safety, and availability of this non-invasive technique, broader adoption and application of this method in clinical settings is warranted.

Twenty-five patients with septic shock underwent simultaneous radionuclide ventriculography and right heart catheterization to clarify the role of the right ventricle in this syndrome. A depressed right ventricular ejection fraction (less than 38%) was present in 13 patients and was found in patients with elevated cardiac output (4 of 6 patients) and with normal or low cardiac output (9 of 19 patients). Right ventricular dysfunction was seen with or without acute respiratory failure. In eight patients, a depressed right ventricular ejection fraction was seen in combination with an abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction (less than 48%), but in five patients, right ventricular ejection fraction impairment occurred with normal left ventricular ejection fraction. There was no significant correlation between abnormal right ventricular afterload and depressed right ventricular ejection fraction. No clinical or hemodynamic finding could be used to identify patients with diminished right ventricular ejection fraction. On follow-up study in 17 surviving patients, right ventricular ejection fraction improved in 6 and was unchanged in 11. Improvement in right ventricular ejection fraction occurred more frequently in patients without pulmonary hypertension or respiratory distress. The results suggest that right ventricular dysfunction in septic shock may be more common than previously suspected. It may be caused by abnormalities in right ventricular afterload in some patients and depressed myocardial contractility in others. The findings are of therapeutic importance since interventions that diminish right ventricular afterload and increase right ventricular contractility would be appropriate in patients with septic shock and right ventricular dysfunction.

No abstract

Background: Despite significant improvements in cardiopulmonary resuscitation, sudden cardiac arrest is one of the leading causes of mortality in the United States. Ultrasound is a widely available tool that can be used to evaluate the presence of cardiac wall motion during cardiac arrest. Several clinical studies have evaluated the use of ultrasound to visualize cardiac motion as a predictor of mortality in cardiac arrest patients. However, there are limited data summarizing the prognostic value of point of care ultrasound evaluation during resuscitation. We performed a systematic literature review of the existing evidence examining the clinical utility of point-of-care ultrasound evaluation of cardiac wall motion as a predictor of cardiac resuscitation outcomes. Methods/results: We performed a systematic PubMed search of clinical studies up to July 23, 2019 evaluating point-of-care sonographic cardiac motion as a predictor of mortality following cardiac resuscitation. We included studies written in English that reviewed short-term outcomes and included adult populations. Fifteen clinical studies met inclusion criteria for assessing cardiac wall motion with point-of-care ultrasound and outcomes following cardiac resuscitation. Fourteen of the fifteen studies showed a statistically significant correlation between the presence of cardiac motion on ultrasound and short-term survival. This was most evident in patients with ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia as a presenting rhythm. Absence of cardiac motion non-survival. The data were pooled and the overall pooled odds ratio for return of spontaneous circulation in the presence of cardiac motion during CPR was 12.4 +/1 2.7 (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Evaluation of cardiac motion on transthoracic echocardiogram is a valuable tool in the prediction of short-term cardiac resuscitation outcomes. Given the safety and availability of ultrasound in the emergency department, it is reasonable to apply point-of-care ultrasound to cardiopulmonary resuscitation as long as its use does not interrupt resuscitation.