Phytophthora cactorum, P. citricola I, and P. plurivora cause bleeding cankers on mature European beech (Fagus sylvatica) trees in the northeastern United States. Inoculation experiments were conducted to compare the aggressiveness of the three Phytophthora spp. on stems, leaf disks, and roots of European beech and common lilac (Syringa vulgaris) seedlings. Isolates were obtained from bleeding cankers on European beech from five cities in New York (Albany, Ithaca, Oyster Bay, Plainview, and Rochester) and from a bleeding canker on sugar maple in Ithaca, NY. Stems were inoculated with colonized agar plugs, leaf disks with a zoospore suspension, and roots via infested soil at three inoculum levels. All organs of inoculated beech and lilac developed disease except for lilac roots inoculated with zoospores of P. cactorum. Disease incidence, severity, and plant survival were dependent on isolate and were also influenced by the tissue inoculated and host. Isolates of P. cactorum were the least aggressive and caused less necrosis than isolates of P. citricola I and P. plurivora. Results emphasize the utility of stem and root inoculation for evaluation of this canker disease and underscore critical differences in species aggressiveness.
100 randomly selected four‐year institutions with very low freshman dropout rates were compared with a comparable group of institutions that had freshman attrition rates that were not “low,” in order to determine whether the two types of institutions differed in respect to 22 selected variables. It was found that colleges with low freshman dropout rates did differ significantly from the comparison group on 15 of the 22 characteristics analyzed. 10 of the 15 variables were personal (i.e., they related to student characteristics), whereas the remaining 5 were nonpersonal (e.g., the size of the institution and the cost of attending it). The general conclusion reached was that administrators who seek to understand and to cope with the freshman dropout problem must take into consideration both personal and nonpersonal factors associated with the phenomenon of freshman attrition.
While bleeding canker of European beech trees (Fagus sylvatica) has long been recognized as a problem in Europe and North America, the cause in the northeastern United States has not been clear. To resolve this, we surveyed for disease prevalence on European beech, identified the pathogens involved, proved their pathogenicity, compared protocols for pathogen detection, and conducted a soil assay to determine pathogen presence in soil surrounding established trees in residential and commercial landscapes in New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Connecticut and Massachusetts. Approximately 40% of surveyed trees had bleeding cankers. While Phytophthora cactorum, P. gonapodyides, P. cambivora and two newly described species, P. citricola I and P. plurivora, were recovered from symptomatic tissue, P. citricola I and P. cactorum were most prevalent. All caused disease when artificially inoculated into European beech sapling stems, although P. cambivora and P. gonapodyides produced significantly smaller lesions. Recovery of the pathogen from symptomatic tissue using selective media, the preferred method of diagnosis, was significantly higher in the fall. ELISA detection was more successful and worked regardless of season, but did not allow identification to the species level. All five Phytophthora species were found in soil surveys; P. cambivora was most common, followed by P. cactorum and P. citricola I. These results provide a foundation for building management strategies to protect valuable specimens of European beech.
Phytophthora citricola and P. cactorum cause bleeding cankers that lead to the death of mature European beech (Fagus sylvatica) in the northeastern United States. The effects of two fungicides and a plant growth regulator on in vitro pathogen characteristics and on canker expansion were investigated. In the first experiment, 16 single-spore isolates (11 P. citricola and 5 P. cactorum) were grown on clarified V8 juice agar amended with (i) 0 to 20 μg a.i./ml of mefenoxam, (ii) 0 to 301,429 μg a.i./ml phosphonate either with or without a bark-penetrating surfactant at 0.5 mg a.i./ml, or (iii) 0 to 25 mg a.i./ml of the surfactant alone. Radial growth, oospore production, and zoospore germination were observed to be dependent on isolate and treatment. A species effect on growth was also observed, as P. cactorum isolates were 2.5- to sevenfold less sensitive to phosphonate, but 2- to 150-fold more sensitive to mefenoxam than P. citricola isolates (based on 50% inhibition of growth). In the second experiment, bark and soil drenches of mefenoxam (50 mg a.i./ml and 19 μg a.i./ml, respectively), phosphonate (301,429 and 101 μg a.i./ml, respectively), and a soil drench of paclobutrazol (21 mg a.i./ml) were evaluated for their efficacy as curative or preventive treatments against bleeding canker. None of the treatments (curative or preventive) were able to stop canker expansion or prevent infection. However, saplings inoculated with P. citricola and treated with the phosphonate bark drench as either a curative or preventive treatment had cankers that were 36 to 82% shorter than those of inoculated control stems treated with water. For saplings inoculated with P. cactorum, the phosphonate bark drench was only effective when applied as a preventive (38% shorter than inoculated control stems treated with water), and not as a curative treatment. No other treatment was effective at limiting canker expansion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.