Summary:In 1986, the bone marrow transplant centers in Ontario agreed to a strategy for the treatment of patients with NHL. Suitable patients would undergo autotransplant but be referred for allotransplant if they had persistent marrow involvement or an inadequate marrow/stem cell harvest. Data of all patients were recorded in a database. We reviewed this database to compare these transplant modalities with respect to overall survival, rate of relapse and treatment-related mortality. Between January 1986 and August 1997, 429 patients underwent BMT for NHL -385 autotransplants and 44 allotransplants. Sixty-eight percent of patients received their transplant for aggressive NHL, while the others had indolent lymphoma. Three-year actuarial survival did not differ between allogeneic and autologous BMT: 71% vs 62%, respectively (P = 0.5330 by log-rank testing). Three-year actuarial rate of relapse was lower after allotransplant than autotransplant: 6% vs 41%, respectively (P = 0.0006 by log-rank testing). Treatmentrelated mortality was higher after allotransplant than autotransplant: 23% vs 6%, respectively (P = 0.001 by 2 analysis). For further comparison, autotransplant patients were randomly matched 2:1 with the allotransplant patients for age ± 5 years, disease status at BMT, disease histology, and year of BMT. In the matched comparison, survival did not differ (relative risk of death after allotransplant: 0.711 (95% CI: 0.309-1.637)). Relapse rate was significantly lower in the allotransplant group (relative risk of relapse for allotransplant: 0.190 (95% CI: 0.043-0.834)) and treatment-related mortality was not significantly different (relative risk for allotransplant: 1.425 (95% CI: 0.527-3.851)). In conclusion, a review of a provincial strategy for treatment of NHL, shows that survival is not different after allogeneic or autologous BMT, but the rate of relapse is lower after allotransplant. These data support continuing the current provincial strategy. Keywords: non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; autotransplant; allotransplant Autologous blood and marrow transplantation (autoBMT) is potentially curative in patients with chemotherapysensitive relapsed aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) 1-3 and improves survival compared with chemotherapy alone. 1,2,4 . Nonetheless, autoBMT is still associated with a moderately high risk of relapse. 1-6 Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT) is a potentially attractive option for the treatment of relapsed NHL, because it provides, in addition to the intensive therapy regimen, a graftversus-lymphoma effect that may reduce the risk of relapse. Its role in the management of patients with relapsed NHL must be explored because of higher treatment-related mortality and morbidity associated with acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease.Few studies have compared autoBMT and alloBMT for the treatment of relapsed NHL. [7][8][9] In a review of 938 autotransplants and 122 allotransplants for relapsed aggressive NHL from the European BMT (EBMT) registry, progression-free survival betw...
Since December 1987, we have examined the use of high-dose chemotherapy and unpurged bone marrow rescue in 31 patients with advanced or refractory lymphoma. Twenty-one patients had Hodgkin's disease (HD) and 10 had Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). At ABMT, 22 patients had relapsed or resistant disease. All patients, excluding 3 early deaths, engrafted. There was no relationship between cell numbers harvested, CFU-GM and bone marrow recovery. The mean times to 0.5 x 10(9)/l neutrophils and 50 x 10(9)/l platelets were 20 d and 43 d respectively. However, 5 patients with HD had a significantly slower platelet recovery time of up to 203 days (p = 0.05). Disease-free survival was 72% for HD and 40% for NHL at 40 months. Relapsed or refractory disease at ABMT, bulky disease, extensive salvage therapy and Karnofsky scores below 80% were all associated with a poorer outcome. The most striking observation has been the dramatic radiological response of some patients with advanced/refractory disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.