A retrospective study was performed to collect information regarding efficacy and toxicity of cidofovir (CDV) in allogeneic stem cell transplant patients. Data were available on 82 patients. The indications for therapy were cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in 20 patients, primary preemptive therapy in 24 patients, and secondary preemptive therapy in 38 patients. Of the patients, 47 had received previous antiviral therapy with ganciclovir, foscarnet, or both drugs. The dosage of CDV was 1 to 5 mg/kg per week followed by maintenance every other week in some patients. The duration of therapy ranged from 1 to 134 days (median, 22 days). All patients received probenecid and prehydration. Ten of 20 (50%) patients who were treated for CMV disease (9 of 16 with pneumonia) responded to CDV therapy, as did 25 of 38 (66%) patients who had failed or relapsed after previous preemptive therapy and 15 of 24 (62%) patients in whom CDV was used as the primary preemptive therapy. Of the patients, 21 (25.6%) developed renal toxicity that remained after cessation of therapy in 12 patients. Fifteen patients developed other toxicities that were potentially due to CDV or the concomitantly given probenecid. No toxicity was seen in 45 (61.6%) patients. Cidofovir can be considered as second-line therapy in patients with CMV disease failing previous antiviral therapy. However, additional studies are needed before CDV can be recommended for preemptive therapy. (Blood. 2001;97:388-392)
Because cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common cause of fatal pneumonia in the immunocompromised host, a rapid and reliable method to confirm this diagnosis is essential. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) has proved to be a rapid, safe, and sensitive method for the diagnosis of several forms of pneumonia in these patients, but its efficacy for confirming CMV pneumonia remains to be established. In this study, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of conventional viral culture, immunocytochemical staining, and cytological examination performed on cells recovered by BAL for establishing CMV as the cause of pneumonia in 71 BAL specimens from 56 immunocompromised patients. Pneumonia due to CMV was confirmed by stated criteria in 14 of these patients. Virus was isolated by culture in BAL specimens from all patients with CMV pneumonia (sensitivity 100%), but also in 17 specimens from patients who did not have CMV pneumonia (specificity 70%). On cytologic examination, CMV inclusions were found in 3 of the 14 specimens from patients with CMV pneumonia (sensitivity 21%) and also in 1 patient at risk for pneumonia but who did not fulfill the criteria (specificity 98%). Thus, a positive culture and positive cytology virtually confirmed CMV pneumonia, whereas a negative culture excluded it. Immunocytochemistry proved to be particularly useful when the culture was positive and cytology was negative. In this situation, specific labeling of CMV antigen by monoclonal antibody was found in 9 of the 11 patients with CMV pneumonia (sensitivity 82%). Thus, the absence of specific staining in BAL cells tended to exclude CMV as a cause of pneumonia in patients with positive cultures and negative cytologies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
In 12 of 20 (60%) biopsy-proven cases of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, the diagnosis was first suggested by examination of routine Gram stains of impression smears made from infected lung tissue and later confirmed by methenamine-silver staining. The cysts appeared as 5- to 7-microns unstained spheres, each containing six to eight intracystic gram-negative bodies (sporozoites). Although the Gram stain does not appear to be as sensitive as more traditional staining techniques for the detection of P. carinii, clinical microbiologists should be aware of the morphology of this organism in gram-stained specimens because this relatively simple procedure gives quick results.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.