The purpose of this article is to examine the international legal aspects of citizenship on the basis of the laws of Kazakhstan and the United Kingdom analysis. For this, the author used general theoretical and specific scientific investigation methods. As a result of the analysis, the author claims that the legal regulation of citizenship is carried out by each state independently. The legal regulation of citizenship is directly related to the migration of people, which has intensified in recent years in connection with armed conflicts and economic decline in some countries. The legal regulation of citizenship must correctly reflect the migration processes in order to prevent negative consequences for both the state and the individual in it. It has been revealed and justified that the legislation on the citizenship of Kazakhstan and the UK provides for a number of requirements for obtaining citizenship. There are two main ways to obtain citizenship: by birth or by naturalization. Based on the analysis, the author concluded that the legislation on the citizenship of Kazakhstan and the UK stipulates that citizenship is acquired and terminated by a specially prescribed legal procedure by the competent government authorities. Based on the analysis of Kazakhstan legislation, it was concluded that the methods of obtaining Kazakhstan's citizenship are: 1) by birth; 2) as a result of naturalization; 3) on the basis of interstate contracts of Kazakhstan; 4) on the grounds provided by the Law of Kazakhstan "On Citizenship". There are also ways to obtain UK citizenship under the British Nationality Act of 1981: 1) by birth; 2) by origin; 3) by naturalization; 4) by registration. Also, on the basis of a scientific approach to the issue of citizenship and its role in the existence of the state, the author concluded that bipatrism (multiple citizenship) adversely affects the state and carries a large risk to the state, including the loss of independence and sovereignty.
No abstract
The purpose of the article on the topic of judicial law-making in the USA, which attempts to invade the educational process and intensify the study of the History of State and Law of Foreign Countries, is devoted to the US Supreme Court-the founder of constitutional justice and one of the pillars in the system of separation of powers. This is a unique judicial institution with an exceptional degree of influence, about which America's famous political writer Alexis do Tocqueville stated that "never before have any people had such a powerful judicial authority". For the reader, the phenomenon of the US Supreme Court is interesting in several ways. First, from the point of view of the evolution of American law and the judicial system in all its dynamics and contradictions. Secondly, in terms of implementation of judicial activity, complex thought processes of finding the right precedents and arguments in a particular case, reaching (if possible) a compromise between judges and colleagues. Judge activity should be interpreted not only as based on law, but also subject to ideological and political influences. Objective: to identify the features of the law-making activities of the US Supreme Court, since judicial law-making in science remains an unsolved problem. Finally, it is very important to look at the US Supreme Court in the eyes of American history as an institution that has the potential to come into conflict with both the legislature and the executive branch. On the other hand, it is important to understand the logic of filling vacancies in the Supreme Court by the executive branch. In the course of continuing in this country, the search for the causes of negative political and legal phenomena, attention is drawn to the interpretation of the federal Constitution by the US Supreme Court, in general, to the activities of this court, which performs the law-making function, is alien to it and is constitutionally unfounded. However, many issues remain insufficiently studied, among them the role of the US Supreme Court in constitutional lawmaking, the very phenomenon of judicial lawmaking.
The article examines the human rights issues based on the experience of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the United Kingdom. A comparative analysis of the scientific views of domestic and foreign scientists; reveals the problematic aspects of protecting human rights.In the era of globalization, the role of the human rights in solving urgent problems of human civilization is growing. In recent years, dramatic changes have occurred in the global legal system and the legal system of Kazakhstan. These changes will serve as the basis for the protection, enforcement and development of human rights. On the one hand, it is a process of integration and regionalization based on world globalization, on the other hand, domestic political and liberal reform processes in Kazakhstan.The main aim of the articles in the context of globalization, to do a comparative analysis of human rights in the Republic of Kazakhstan and in the UK, to develop further recommendations for improving the human rights legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
The purpose of this article is to examine the international legal aspects of citizenship on the basis of the laws of Kazakhstan and the United Kingdom analysis. For this, the author used general theoretical and specific scientific investigation methods. As a result of the analysis, the author claims that the legal regulation of citizenship is carried out by each state independently. The legal regulation of citizenship is directly related to the migration of people, which has intensified in recent years in connection with armed conflicts and economic decline in some countries. The legal regulation of citizenship must correctly reflect the migration processes in order to prevent negative consequences for both the state and the individual in it. It has been revealed and justified that the legislation on the citizenship of Kazakhstan and the UK provides for a number of requirements for obtaining citizenship. There are two main ways to obtain citizenship: by birth or by naturalization. Based on the analysis, the author concluded that the legislation on the citizenship of Kazakhstan and the UK stipulates that citizenship is acquired and terminated by a specially prescribed legal procedure by the competent government authorities. Based on the analysis of Kazakhstan legislation, it was concluded that the methods of obtaining Kazakhstan's citizenship are: 1) by birth; 2) as a result of naturalization; 3) on the basis of interstate contracts of Kazakhstan; 4) on the grounds provided by the Law of Kazakhstan "On Citizenship". There are also ways to obtain UK citizenship under the British Nationality Act of 1981: 1) by birth; 2) by origin; 3) by naturalization; 4) by registration. Also, on the basis of a scientific approach to the issue of citizenship and its role in the existence of the state, the author concluded that bipatrism (multiple citizenship) adversely affects the state and carries a large risk to the state, including the loss of independence and sovereignty.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.