1995
DOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(95)00115-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

σ Binding site ligands inhibit cell proliferation in mammary and colon carcinoma cell lines and melanoma cells in culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present s2/Bcl-XS-mediated apoptotic component consistently accounts for approximately 20% of HAL's cytotoxicity (and, thus, may be overshadowed by the more pronounced Vitamin E-sensitive oxidative stress-associated component already described 4,17,18 ). Although our functional data reveal a rank-order potency reminiscent of s2 receptor activation, 11,38 for example, rimcazole4HAL444DTG ¼ SKF, this does not necessarily reflect the rank-orders obtained by standard radioligand binding studies (see Table 1). Indeed, even pharmacologic profiles for an individual receptor determined by radioligand binding studies often do not concord and may reflect different s1 or s2 receptor subtypes, strain, species and tissue differences, possible allosteric modulation and even non-specific binding to metabolic enzymes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present s2/Bcl-XS-mediated apoptotic component consistently accounts for approximately 20% of HAL's cytotoxicity (and, thus, may be overshadowed by the more pronounced Vitamin E-sensitive oxidative stress-associated component already described 4,17,18 ). Although our functional data reveal a rank-order potency reminiscent of s2 receptor activation, 11,38 for example, rimcazole4HAL444DTG ¼ SKF, this does not necessarily reflect the rank-orders obtained by standard radioligand binding studies (see Table 1). Indeed, even pharmacologic profiles for an individual receptor determined by radioligand binding studies often do not concord and may reflect different s1 or s2 receptor subtypes, strain, species and tissue differences, possible allosteric modulation and even non-specific binding to metabolic enzymes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…20,21,39 Functional studies oftentimes contribute to the confusion as many such studies rely on HAL for its presumed capacity as a s receptor 'antagonist', whereas it has been clearly shown that HAL can act as a s2 receptor agonist in certain cases (present study). 11,38 Any discrepancy between functional and binding data could simply reflect the differential ability of s2 ligands to access intracellular s2 receptors, as suggested by Vilner et al, 12,29 or could reflect blunting of the s2 effect by simultaneous activation of the s1 receptors as demonstrated presently with DTG (and evidenced indirectly by our N2a neuroblastoma cell cultures, which do not respond to s1 receptor activation and are much more sensitive to HAL). The atypical antipsychotics OLA and QUE do not initiate the Bcl-XS-mediated mechanism, which corroborates our demonstrations of greater neuroprotective potential of atypical antipsychotics, versus the more traditional HAL, in several models of cell death/stress (see Wei et al 16 and references therein).…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…According to previous studies of sigma1R, we found that sigma1R had two transmembrane segments with the NH 2 and COOH termini on the cytoplasmic side of the membrane (Aydar et al 2002). Sigma1R drugs were observed to combine with the receptor and play an important role in inhibition of proliferation and apoptosis of cancer cells (Brent and Pang 1995;Spruce et al 2004). The effects were achieved by interactions with ion channels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small molecules that bind to the receptor ( ligands) are cytotoxic to neural and nonneural cell lines (8), inhibit proliferation in mammary and colon carcinoma and melanoma cell lines (9), and induce apoptosis in colon and mammary adenocarcinoma cell lines (10,11). There is good evidence that so-called -2 agonists induce apoptosis that is caspase independent in mammary carcinoma cell lines (11,12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%