2014
DOI: 10.7498/aps.63.162301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

β--decay half-lives for waiting point nucleiaround N=82

Abstract: Based on the exponential formula of β--decay half-lives for nuclei far from stable line, the half-lives of nuclei around N=82 (R-process waiting point nuclei) are calculated. The results are compared with recent theoretical and experimental data. It is shown that compared with the complicated and time-consuming microscopic calculation, the exponential formula including the shell effect can give the results of β--decay half-lives for R-process waiting point nuclei quicker and better. The results can be used as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table (2), shows the standard deviation (𝛿) for the average nuclear binding energy in the range of (10 ≤ 𝑍 ≤ 98) according to the (LDM). The results indicated the accuracy of the new equation (8) in determining the (𝑄 𝛽 + − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒) in terms of nuclear binding energy instead of masses difference as it is usual, thus, indicates high possibility of (LDM) in determining the nuclear binding energy for all studied nuclei.…”
Section: Fig (8): Average Nuclear Binding Energy Versus Mass Number (A) For Experimental and Theoretical Values Of The (Ldm)mentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table (2), shows the standard deviation (𝛿) for the average nuclear binding energy in the range of (10 ≤ 𝑍 ≤ 98) according to the (LDM). The results indicated the accuracy of the new equation (8) in determining the (𝑄 𝛽 + − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒) in terms of nuclear binding energy instead of masses difference as it is usual, thus, indicates high possibility of (LDM) in determining the nuclear binding energy for all studied nuclei.…”
Section: Fig (8): Average Nuclear Binding Energy Versus Mass Number (A) For Experimental and Theoretical Values Of The (Ldm)mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…When we applied the above equation on all studied nuclei, it showed an acceptable match between the experimental and theoretical values with acceptable standard deviation. The equation (8) we will be denoted as modified liquid drop model (MLDM).…”
Section: 𝑜𝑑𝑑 − 𝑜𝑑𝑑 𝑛𝑢𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑖mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sargent [22] proposed a fifth power law between the decay half-life and decay energy. Recently, we systematically analyzed the experimental data for decay halflife and found an exponential law for the decay halflife for nuclei far from stability, which is similar to the relation between the decay half-life and decay energy [23][24][25]. The calculations with an empirical formula based on this exponential law reproduce the experimental data well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…It can be seen from the two panels that the ratio has a minimum value around the shell (N = 82) and subshell closures (N = 92). To consider the shell correction, we use the form to describe empirically, where S represents the shell correction described by the Gaussian function [24]. The expression for including the proton number Z and the neutron number N can be written as…”
Section: R Amentioning
confidence: 99%