2021
DOI: 10.1096/fj.202101031rr
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

α1‐Antitrypsin derived SP16 peptide demonstrates efficacy in rodent models of acute and neuropathic pain

Abstract: SP16 is an innovative peptide derived from the carboxyl‐terminus of α1‐Antitrypsin (AAT), corresponding to residues 364‐380, and contains recognition sequences for the low‐density lipoprotein receptor‐related protein‐1 (LRP1). LRP1 is an endocytic and cell‐signaling receptor that regulates inflammation. Deletion of Lrp1 in Schwann cells increases neuropathic pain; however, the role of LRP1 activation in nociceptive and neuropathic pain regulation remains unknown. Herein, we show that SP16 is bioactive in senso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the four selected peptides, only peptide 2 activated Akt and ERK1/2 signaling in primary hSCs and bound to the LRP1 binding domains, CCR II and CCR IV, suggesting that this peptide is a true human LRP1 binder. Among these 4 peptides, only peptide 2 contains two somewhat proximal lysine residues that is consistent with critical lysine residues identified in the binding region of other LRP1 ligands , such as coagulation factor VIII, PAI-1, and more recently, SP16 . When lysine 111 was converted to an alanine, the level of binding to CCRII was reduced.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the four selected peptides, only peptide 2 activated Akt and ERK1/2 signaling in primary hSCs and bound to the LRP1 binding domains, CCR II and CCR IV, suggesting that this peptide is a true human LRP1 binder. Among these 4 peptides, only peptide 2 contains two somewhat proximal lysine residues that is consistent with critical lysine residues identified in the binding region of other LRP1 ligands , such as coagulation factor VIII, PAI-1, and more recently, SP16 . When lysine 111 was converted to an alanine, the level of binding to CCRII was reduced.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Only GST-PEX and peptide 2 pulled down the LRP1 CCR II and IV domains (Figure A). When we added RAP, a competitive antagonist to LRP1 routinely used to block binding of ligands to LRP1, , binding of GST-PEX was substantially inhibited (Figure B) but not peptide 2 . We attribute this finding to the small size of peptide 2 compared to GST-PEX, which may not be inhibited sterically by RAP for binding to LRP1 as previously observed with other protein LRP1 ligands.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 Of note, SP16 is different from other antiinflammatory strategies being studied in STEMI (ie, anakinra) 16 because it is the first to exploit a natural signaling process that is anti-inflammatory as a receptor agonist for LRP1 9 and exhibits cellular and tissue repair as was shown in numerous disease models. 9,21 In a first-in-human phase 1 study of SP16 given to healthy volunteers, a single subcutaneous injection of SP16 up to 0.2 mg/kg (max dose of 12 mg) was well-tolerated and lacked any cardiac (or noncardiac) toxicities or biochemical effects on coagulation, platelet function, and liver enzymes. In line with these findings, the administration of SP16 was safe, well-tolerated, and not associated with any drug-related adverse events in the current phase 1B/2A study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 Of note, SP16 is different from other anti-inflammatory strategies being studied in STEMI (ie, anakinra) 16 because it is the first to exploit a natural signaling process that is anti-inflammatory as a receptor agonist for LRP1 9 and exhibits cellular and tissue repair as was shown in numerous disease models. 9,21…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L3, L4, and L5 DRGs were then collected. DRGs and sciatic nerves were embedded in paraffin, and IHC studies were performed as previously described (Wang et al, 2022). Briefly, 1–5 μm thick DRG or nerve tissue sections were immunostained for PACSIN1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%