“…37,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] The ubiquitous themes tying these studies together are: (i) the evidence for the coupling of unimolecular and bimolecular dehydration pathways, where adsorbed dimers that produce di-alkyl ethers (bimolecular dehydration product) can also contribute to olefin formation (unimolecular dehydration product), 43,44 (ii) inhibition of olefin formation rates at high alcohol partial pressures (> 50 torr) due to the higher stability of adsorbed alcohol dimers relative to monomers, 37,39 and (iii) an increased preference to unimolecular dehydration with increasing temperatures. 37,39,43,44 The favorability of E1/E2 elimination pathways during alcohol dehydration on zeolites depends on the stability of carbenium formed during the prominence of E2 type pathways as the RDS for isopropanol (a secondary alcohol) dehydration in aluminosilicates MFI, 41,48 and FAU, 41 primary alcohol dehydration primarily occurs through E1-type elimination pathways. 37,39,40,[43][44][45][46][47] To better understand the active centers of P-zeosils, we sought to compare the kinetics of isopropanol (IPA) dehydration over the two families of catalysts (aluminosilicates and P-zeosils).…”