2001
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-13760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zytotoxizität und Genotoxizität von Fluoriden in humaner Mukosa und Lymphozyten

Abstract: Beside the cytotoxic effect of fluorides, also a minor genotoxic impact on human mucosa and on peripheral lymphocytes could be demonstrated using the Comet assay. Further investigations are warranted to examine fluorides in a model allowing for repeated or long term incubations on structurally intact human mucosa in vitro. Such a model will help to distinguish between DNA damage that may be repaired successfully and other impairments that may show an additive character in repetitive or chronic exposure in vivo. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
15
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We assumed that these negative results were obtained because fluoride is not capable of forming adducts on DNA bases or those that intercalate in DNA secondary structure. Our results are consistent with those of other studies 12,13,17,24 . An earlier study conducted by our group reported that NaF did not induce DNA damage in oral mucosa cells in vitro either 21 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We assumed that these negative results were obtained because fluoride is not capable of forming adducts on DNA bases or those that intercalate in DNA secondary structure. Our results are consistent with those of other studies 12,13,17,24 . An earlier study conducted by our group reported that NaF did not induce DNA damage in oral mucosa cells in vitro either 21 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Studies focusing on possible genotoxic effect of excess fluoride are contradictory and inconclusive 16 . According to some authors, fluoride does not induce DNA damage 10,13,18,22 . However, some authors have observed the genotoxic potential of fluoride in Drosophila melanogaster 7 as well as synergistic and antagonist effect with known genotoxins 20 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when cells were allowed to interact with the two xenobiotics at the indicated concentrations, cell viability was significantly reduced. Kleinsasser et al 9 have previously found that F causes mucosal cell damage …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, F has been shown to be toxic, not only to the skeletal system, but also to the soft tissues by multiple mechanisms, such as enzyme activity inhibition, reactive oxygen and nitrogen species generation, impairment of the antioxidant defense system, induction of inflammation, and apoptosis. [6][7][8][9][10] As AgNPs and F may be used concomitantly in dental practice, we studied the effects of co-exposure to these xenobiotics on human gingival fibroblasts. It is known that xenobiotic interaction may increase or decrease the toxic effect of one or many substances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, published studies focusing on the possible genotoxic effect of excess fluoride are contradictory and inconclusive [Li et al, 1988]. According to some authors, fluoride does not induce DNA damage [Kihlman, 1957;Kram, 1978;Martin, 1979;IARC, 1982;Li et al, 1989;Slamenova, 1992;Kleinsasser, 2001]. However, some authors have observed the mutagenic potential of fluoride in Drosophila melanogaster [Mohamed, 1968;Mohamed and Chandler, 1977;Gerdes, 1971], synergistic and antagonist effects with known mutagens [Voegel, 1973;Monsour et al, 1985] and neurotoxic effects in humans [Mullenix, 1996] and rats [Chen et al, 2002].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%