1960
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1112718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zur Stellung des Butansultamderivates Ospolot in der Behandlung zerebraler Anfallsleiden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1961
1961
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Together with slight paresthesias noted by some of the volunteers and patients, the side effects are the same as those encountered with the use of sulthiam. 3 All are considered a consequence of the known acidotic effects of carbonic anhydrase inhibitory activity. The only other effect observed was an asymptomatic decrease in the secretion of hydrochloric acid from the gastric mucosa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together with slight paresthesias noted by some of the volunteers and patients, the side effects are the same as those encountered with the use of sulthiam. 3 All are considered a consequence of the known acidotic effects of carbonic anhydrase inhibitory activity. The only other effect observed was an asymptomatic decrease in the secretion of hydrochloric acid from the gastric mucosa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tachypnoea occurred in a few cases in patients taking more than 0.6 g daily. Flugel et al (3) note that this side effect tended to occur especially in temporal lobe cases. Raffauf (6) reported 3 cases of status epilepticus occurring in a group of 32 patients treated exclusively with sulthiame.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the first clinical reports of its therapeutic effect, used alone and in combination with other anticonvulsant drugs, it was stated that it was most effective in the treatment of temporal lobe attacks and other types of focal seizure, 5&90yu of patients with such attacks being markedly improved. It was less effective in the control of major seizures ( I , 3,6). There is a lack of sedative effect, but several side effects were observed, the most common being paraesthesiae in the extremities, usually disappearing despite continuation of treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%