2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-328x(00)00854-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zur Elektronenstruktur metallorganischer Komplexe der f-Elemente

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest and lowest-lying-orbitals are unchanged upon coordination of the ligand; however, the total splitting of the f-orbitals is decreased as previously observed for (C 5 H 5 ) 3 Nd isocyanide adducts. 19 Both experimentally and computationally, coordination of the isocyanide ligand does not greatly destabilize the f z 3 orbital relative to 1 and does not stabilize the (f xz 2 ,f yz 2 )-orbitals that could interact with the π*-orbital of the ligand in agreement with the SOMOs illustrated in Figure 1. However, the splitting of the f-orbitals reflects the anisotropy of their interactions with ligands as well as the strength of those interactions (a spherically symmetric crystal field does not split the orbitals regardless of the strength of the interaction).…”
Section: Cp" 3 Nd•l (2 and 3)mentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The highest and lowest-lying-orbitals are unchanged upon coordination of the ligand; however, the total splitting of the f-orbitals is decreased as previously observed for (C 5 H 5 ) 3 Nd isocyanide adducts. 19 Both experimentally and computationally, coordination of the isocyanide ligand does not greatly destabilize the f z 3 orbital relative to 1 and does not stabilize the (f xz 2 ,f yz 2 )-orbitals that could interact with the π*-orbital of the ligand in agreement with the SOMOs illustrated in Figure 1. However, the splitting of the f-orbitals reflects the anisotropy of their interactions with ligands as well as the strength of those interactions (a spherically symmetric crystal field does not split the orbitals regardless of the strength of the interaction).…”
Section: Cp" 3 Nd•l (2 and 3)mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…10 Common approaches to studying bonding in actinides and lanthanides are comparing ions with either similar ionic radii, e.g., Ce(III) vs U(III), or similar electronic structures, e.g., Nd(III) vs U(III). 14,16,18,19 The role of this orbital in bonding may also be observed by photoelectron spectroscopy although the effect is more pronounced in the Cp 3 M + molecular cations. More recently, the relative energies of the ligand and metal-orbitals have received increased attention due to their roles in increasing covalency by "accidental degeneracy" (increased covalency due to the similar ligand and metal-orbital energies).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Theoretically, in the case of lower membered aromatic ligands such as Cp, the actual C 5v symmetry of the [Sm (Cp)] 2ϩ moiety has to be considered. However, a number of previous studies of ψ trigonal pyramidal [39] and ψ trigonal bipyramidal [40] Cp complexes of rare earths showed that the fivemembered Cp rings disturb the pseudo symmetry only weakly. Therefore, in the framework of this approach instead of the actual molecular C 5v the higher C ϱv symmetry is assumed.…”
Section: General Symmetry Considerations Selection Rules and The Phementioning
confidence: 94%
“…[10][11][12][13] In addition, a large number of studies have examined the coupling between f-ions and adjacent paramagnetic transition metals or organic radicals. 1,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] Two factors make it challenging to quantify f-electron coupling. First, the magnetic moments of f-ions, except for f 7 -systems, are temperature dependent and highly anisotropic due to a combination of strong spin-orbit coupling and weak crystal fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%