2003
DOI: 10.1002/ejic.200300309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal Field Strengths, Nephelauxetic Effects, and Experimentally Based Molecular Orbital Schemes (in the f Range) of Selected Cyclopentadienyl Complexes of Samarium(III)

Abstract: The absorption and luminescence spectra of pseudo (ψ) trigonal planar [Sm(η5‐C5H4tBu)3] (1), low symmetric [Sm(η5‐Cp)(η3‐Tp)(η2‐Tp)] (Cp = η5‐cyclopentadienyl; Tp = hydrotris(3,5‐dimethylpyrazolyl)borato) (2) as well as ψ trigonal pyramidal [Sm(η5‐C5H4tBu)3(THF)] (3), [Sm(η5‐Cp)3(THF)] (4) and [Sm(η5‐Cp)3(CNC6H11)] (5) have been measured at room and low temperatures. From the spectra obtained, truncated crystal field (CF) splitting patterns of these compounds could be derived, and simulated by fitting the para… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
8

Year Published

2004
2004
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
16
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, according to the results of model calculations, the addition of one and, even more, of two axial ligands considerably reduces (assuming constant Ln-C bond lengths) the absolute value of the dominant CF parameter B 0 2 , leading to lower N v = ffiffiffiffiffi ffi 4p p values [11]. These explanations are consistent with the considerably smaller total splitting of f orbitals in the experimentally-based MO schemes of [La 0.8 Sm 0.2 (Cp) 3 -(NCCH 3 ) 2 ] and [Sm(C 5 H 4 tBu) 3 (THF)] as compared to Sm(C 5 H 4 tBu) 3 [18].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, according to the results of model calculations, the addition of one and, even more, of two axial ligands considerably reduces (assuming constant Ln-C bond lengths) the absolute value of the dominant CF parameter B 0 2 , leading to lower N v = ffiffiffiffiffi ffi 4p p values [11]. These explanations are consistent with the considerably smaller total splitting of f orbitals in the experimentally-based MO schemes of [La 0.8 Sm 0.2 (Cp) 3 -(NCCH 3 ) 2 ] and [Sm(C 5 H 4 tBu) 3 (THF)] as compared to Sm(C 5 H 4 tBu) 3 [18].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Fitting the free parameters of the phenomenological Hamiltonian of the spin-free f 1 system to the calculated energies of f orbitals of Sm(g 5 -C 5 H 5 ) 3 one arrives at B 0 2 = À3443 cm À1 , B 0 4 = 2817 cm À1 , B 0 6 = 1296 cm À1 and B 6 6 = À6033 cm À1 [18]. Comparing these values with those of compound 1 (see Table 2), it becomes evident that first of all the CF parameters B 6 6 (which considers the interactions between orbitals f xðx 2 À3y 2 Þ and f yð3x 2 Ày 2 Þ within the framework of CF theory) but also B 0 4 are heavily overestimated by the model calculation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Werden anstelle mehrerer Substituenten nur eine der sterisch anspruchsvolleren t Bu-, SiMe 3 -oder SiEt 3 -Gruppen in die Cp-Ringe eingefü hrt, verschiebt sich das Maximum der Charge-transfer-Bande zwar merklich zu hö heren Wellenzahlen, dennoch konnten bei den bislang mitgeteilten KF-Analysen von Pr(C 5 H 4 SiMe 3 ) 3 [10] und Sm(C 5 H 4 t Bu) 3 [11] lediglich die Energien von 24 bzw. 25 KF-Zuständen verläßlich erfaßt werden, wodurch die bei der Simulation der experimentellen KF-Aufspaltungsmuster verwendeten Parameter naturgemäß mit grö ßeren Unsicherheiten behaftet sind.…”
Section: Einführungunclassified