Zum Verhältnis von Epistemizität und Evidentialität im Deutschen aus diachroner und typologischer Sicht

Kotin, Michail L.; Schönherr, Monika

doi:10.37307/j.1868-7806.2012.03.05

ZfdPh

2012

DOI: 10.37307/j.1868-7806.2012.03.05

|View full text |Cite

Zum Verhältnis von Epistemizität und Evidentialität im Deutschen aus diachroner und typologischer Sicht

Michail L. Kotin¹,

Monika Schönherr²

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2019

2020

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As an anonymous reviewer pointed out, the deontic meaning of sollen+infinitive can also be determined by a direct comparison with the modal verb construction müssen+infinitive, which is treated as the featureless part of the opposition whereas sollen+infinitive bears an additional feature, namely "remote source" (cf. Kotin 2011: 36f., Kotin / Schönherr 2012).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Reportatives "sollen"+Infinitiv in Interrogativsätzen

Socka

2020

SGG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, the reportive construction sollen+infinitive is treated as merely agnostic, with the negative epistemic component emerging qua conversational implicature. The paper aims to test whether the interrogative sentence type can be seen as a contextual trigger for this implicature. It concludes that the negative epistemic implicature can be triggered or strengthened by proper questions and mirative questions, but not by rhetorical or unresolvable questions as defined by Celle (2018).

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Reportatives "sollen"+Infinitiv in Interrogativsätzen

Socka

2020

SGG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Praktiken des Zitierens in der vormodernen Wissensliteratur

Habermann¹

2019

Zeitschrift Für Germanistische Linguistik

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article deals with formal and functional aspects of reported speech in printed natural history texts from the late Middle Ages to the early modern period from a pragmatic point of view. The topos of authority played a crucial role in medieval and early modern non-fictional literature and served to legitimize the knowledge offered by the author. Originally, direct or indirect citation proved knowledge of the authorities, a means by which the author claimed the truth for his statements. In the course of time, direct and indirect speech in scientific texts became more and more a formal and functional tool for positioning one’s own way of thinking in opposition to other opinions.

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Zum Verhältnis von Epistemizität und Evidentialität im Deutschen aus diachroner und typologischer Sicht

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Reportatives "sollen"+Infinitiv in Interrogativsätzen

Reportatives "sollen"+Infinitiv in Interrogativsätzen

Praktiken des Zitierens in der vormodernen Wissensliteratur

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About