2014
DOI: 10.5154/r.rchscfa.2013.11.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ZONIFICACIÓN ALTITUDINAL PROVISIONAL DE Abies religiosa EN UN ÁREA CERCANA A LA RESERVA DE LA BIÓSFERA DE LA MARIPOSA MONARCA, MICHOACÁN

Abstract: El objetivo del presente trabajo fue determinar la existencia de diferenciación morfológica (como indicador de variación genética) entre poblaciones de Abies religiosa, con la finalidad de delimitar una zonificación altitudinal para decidir el movimiento de semillas en los programas de reforestación. Se recolectaron y analizaron morfológicamente ramas y conos de 11 individuos de 15 poblaciones de A. religiosa en el cerro de San Andrés, municipio de Hidalgo, Michoacán (cercano a la Reserva de la Biósfera de la … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The zonification developed based on the least significant difference that made two populations differ genetically for relevant quantitative traits is two-fold, such that forest managers can choose to use either elevation or climatic values to decide seed and seedling movements. The elevational interval that delineates the new zonification, 350 m of elevational difference, is broader in range than previously utilized elevation intervals (250 m of elevational difference), the delimitation of which was based solely on morphological evaluation (longitude of cones and needles; CASTELLANOS-ACUÑA et al, 2014).…”
Section: Use Of Zonificationmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The zonification developed based on the least significant difference that made two populations differ genetically for relevant quantitative traits is two-fold, such that forest managers can choose to use either elevation or climatic values to decide seed and seedling movements. The elevational interval that delineates the new zonification, 350 m of elevational difference, is broader in range than previously utilized elevation intervals (250 m of elevational difference), the delimitation of which was based solely on morphological evaluation (longitude of cones and needles; CASTELLANOS-ACUÑA et al, 2014).…”
Section: Use Of Zonificationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Abies religiosa populations exhibit morphological differentiation for cone size and needle length along the elevational gradient (CASTELLANOS-ACUÑA et al, 2014). This differentiation is likely to have a genetic basis due to the selective force imposed by the climate gradient, as has been demonstrated for several conifers in North America and Mexico (some examples are: REHFELDT 1988;REHFELDT et al, 2014a;2014b;RUIZ-TALONIA et al, 2014;LOYA-REBOLLAR et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Esto es compatible con los patrones observados para especies del género Betula, donde los terpenos tienen un componente de heredabilidad materna dominante, pero con influencia de la fuente de polen (Isidorov Stocki, & Vetchinikova, 2019). Además, este comportamiento atípico de procedencias de mayor Silva-Farias, & Sáenz-Romero, 2014;Ortiz-Bibian et al, 2017;Ortiz-Bibian et al, 2019), meaning that altitudinal variation should be considered in the management and conservation of forest species populations.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…The regression model fit between population performance against climate or altitude of the population of origin was used to delineate the zones, as well the association between altitude and climate values of the provenances (REHFELDT, 1991;SÁENZ-ROMERO et al, 2006). It is noteworthy that use of 0.2 alpha error on this zone delineation process leads to a more conservative set of management rules, because the resulting altitudinal intervals, making two population significantly different, are narrower and therefore there will be more restrictions on seed movement (SÁENZ-ROMERO et al, 2006;SOTO-CORREA et al, 2012;CASTELLANOS-ACUÑA et al, 2014).…”
Section: Seed Zoningmentioning
confidence: 99%