2015
DOI: 10.1007/s40843-015-0017-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ZnO nanostructures in enzyme biosensors

Abstract: Biosensing has developed tremendously since it was demonstrated by Leland C. Clark Jr. in 1962. ZnO nanomaterials are attractive candidates for fabricating biosensors, because of their diverse range of nanostructures, high electron mobility, chemical stability, electrochemical activity, high isoelectric points which promote enzyme adsorption, biocompatibility, and piezoelectric properties. This review covers ZnO nanostructures applied in enzyme biosensors, in the light of electrochemical transduction and field… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
0
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, fuel cells, especially glucose biofuel cells (GBFCs), with the help of catalyst, can produce electric energy in an efficient and steady way and are considered as the promising next-generation energy devices due to their available and easy capability to harvest electrical energy from glucose fuel [1]. Generally, glucose biosensors and GBFCs can be classified into two categories according to the types of catalysts, namely enzymebased and nonenzyme-based ones [2][3][4]. Research findings demonstrate that enzymatic catalysts exhibit high activity and excellent selectivity, but the unstable operating environment and fragile stability greatly hinder their practical applications [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, fuel cells, especially glucose biofuel cells (GBFCs), with the help of catalyst, can produce electric energy in an efficient and steady way and are considered as the promising next-generation energy devices due to their available and easy capability to harvest electrical energy from glucose fuel [1]. Generally, glucose biosensors and GBFCs can be classified into two categories according to the types of catalysts, namely enzymebased and nonenzyme-based ones [2][3][4]. Research findings demonstrate that enzymatic catalysts exhibit high activity and excellent selectivity, but the unstable operating environment and fragile stability greatly hinder their practical applications [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the bare GCE is covered with nafion, the slope of GCE/ nafion (Fig. 5a, pink dot line) is higher than that of GCE, confirming that the diffusion resistance of GCE/nafion is larger than that of bare GCE [51]. However, when NS-C is assembled on the surface of GCE, the R ct of the GCE/ …”
Section: Eis and CV Characterizations Of The Modified Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In addition, ZnO NRs provide a free path of electrons between the glucose and the surface of the electrode, and a high surface-to-bulk ratio. Glucose oxidase can be adsorbed in a large surface area that is provided by the high surface-to-volume ratio of the as-grown ZnO NRs [20]. …”
Section: Materials and Device Characterizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, ZnO NRs provide a free path of electrons between the glucose and the surface of the electrode, and a high surface-to-bulk ratio. Glucose oxidase can be adsorbed in a large surface area that is provided by the high surface-to-volume ratio of the as-grown ZnO NRs [20]. For device characterization, all measurements were performed using a Source Meter Keithley 2410 and an electrochemical impedance analyzer (Gamry potentiostat, Gamry Instruments, Warminster, PA, USA), and the measurements were performed in a PBS with a pH of 7.4.…”
Section: Materials and Device Characterizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%