Abstract:Studies have found that low water-soluble zinc (Zn) sources are not as effective in supplying Zn for plant use as highly water soluble ZnSO 4 ·2H 2 O. However, there is a question as to the residual effects of Zn from low water-soluble fertilizers on subsequent crops. The objective of this greenhouse study was to determine the relationship between water solubility of Zn fertilizers and Zn availability over four cropping periods. Three Zn fertilizers with 99.7, 56.0, and 6.0% water solubility were evaluated at … Show more
“…Adding more fertilizer to maintain a sufficient level of available Zn will increase total content in soil. Increased total soil Zn may create problems of Zn toxicity for crops in the future, especially if land use should be changed or when soil should become relocated, e.g., by erosion, and then subjected to conditions that result in Zn mobilization (Brennan and Bolland 2006; Shaver et al, 2007).…”
There is no reliable indicator for identifying Zn‐deficiency tolerant genotypes with high grain yield. The aim of this investigation was to compare the grain yield response of 30 spring and 20 winter bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes to Zn fertilization under field condition and to select high grain yield Zn‐deficiency tolerant genotypes using a stress tolerance indicator. The stress tolerance indicator is a stress tolerance index (STI) used to identify genotypes that produce high yields under both nonstress and stress environments. Two individual trials, each consisting of two field plot experiments, were conducted during the 2006–2007 growing season. Spring wheat genotypes (Trial l) and winter wheat genotypes (Trial 2) were planted in two different locations. Two Zn rates, 0 and 40 kg Zn ha−1, using ZnSO4·7H2O were evaluated. Grain yield varied significantly (P < 0.01) among wheat genotypes regardless of Zn treatment. Application of Zn fertilizer increased grain yield of spring wheat genotypes an average of 883 and 913 kg ha−1 in Karaj and Isfahan locations, respectively, although considerable variation was found among genotypes in response to Zn fertilization. Zinc efficiency (ZE) significantly differed among wheat genotypes and ranged from 69% to 95% for spring wheat and from 62% to 105% for winter wheat genotypes. Most of the wheat genotypes were placed in group A (genotypes that are not affected by stress) and D (genotypes with low yield in both stress and nonstress environments) based on the STI. The results showed that the STI could be a better selection criterion compared with ZE for identifying high‐yield stress‐tolerant genotypes.
“…Adding more fertilizer to maintain a sufficient level of available Zn will increase total content in soil. Increased total soil Zn may create problems of Zn toxicity for crops in the future, especially if land use should be changed or when soil should become relocated, e.g., by erosion, and then subjected to conditions that result in Zn mobilization (Brennan and Bolland 2006; Shaver et al, 2007).…”
There is no reliable indicator for identifying Zn‐deficiency tolerant genotypes with high grain yield. The aim of this investigation was to compare the grain yield response of 30 spring and 20 winter bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes to Zn fertilization under field condition and to select high grain yield Zn‐deficiency tolerant genotypes using a stress tolerance indicator. The stress tolerance indicator is a stress tolerance index (STI) used to identify genotypes that produce high yields under both nonstress and stress environments. Two individual trials, each consisting of two field plot experiments, were conducted during the 2006–2007 growing season. Spring wheat genotypes (Trial l) and winter wheat genotypes (Trial 2) were planted in two different locations. Two Zn rates, 0 and 40 kg Zn ha−1, using ZnSO4·7H2O were evaluated. Grain yield varied significantly (P < 0.01) among wheat genotypes regardless of Zn treatment. Application of Zn fertilizer increased grain yield of spring wheat genotypes an average of 883 and 913 kg ha−1 in Karaj and Isfahan locations, respectively, although considerable variation was found among genotypes in response to Zn fertilization. Zinc efficiency (ZE) significantly differed among wheat genotypes and ranged from 69% to 95% for spring wheat and from 62% to 105% for winter wheat genotypes. Most of the wheat genotypes were placed in group A (genotypes that are not affected by stress) and D (genotypes with low yield in both stress and nonstress environments) based on the STI. The results showed that the STI could be a better selection criterion compared with ZE for identifying high‐yield stress‐tolerant genotypes.
“…These sources generally differ in terms of water solubility, which is an important parameter that determines their uptake by plants (Amrani et al 1999;Shaver et al 2007;Salanenka and Taylor 2011). Prado et al (2007) compared two sources of zinc for maize seed treatment -zinc sulphate (water-soluble) and zinc oxide (water-insoluble) -and verified that the first is able to promote a higher uptake of zinc by plants.…”
ABSTRACT:Seed treatment is an interesting alternative to deliver micronutrients to field crops. The aim of this study was to investigate the uptake of Cu and Zn by maize seedlings, with the application of the water-insoluble sources copper carbonate and zinc oxide as
“…The availability of this applied amount depends, among other factors, on the source applied (Shaver, Westfall, and Ronaghi 2007) or on the soil properties; for example, in calcareous soils the presence of hydroxides and carbonates can produce low availability (Alloway 2005). Zinc chelates provide this micronutrient to produce high concentrations of water-soluble Zn and available Zn in soils, though the effectiveness of these chelates depends on their stability.…”
The aim of this study was to compare the behavior of residual zinc (Zn) from different synthetic chelates containing the chelating agents EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetate acid), HEDTA (hydroxyethyl-ethylenediaminetriacetate acid), and DTPA (diethylenetriaminepentaacetate acid) applied at different rates. This incubation experiment was carried out under two different moisture conditions (60 percent field capacity and waterlogged) and in two different soils
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.